11.04.2013 Views

michigan hypertension core curriculum - State of Michigan

michigan hypertension core curriculum - State of Michigan

michigan hypertension core curriculum - State of Michigan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Use <strong>of</strong> Dihydropyridine Calcium Antagonist in Chronic Kidney Disease<br />

270 Hypertension Core Curriculum<br />

John M. Flack, MD, MPH<br />

There has been substantial concern in the literature regarding the use <strong>of</strong> dihydropyridine (DHP)<br />

calcium antagonists in patients with CKD, especially proteinuric kidney disease. The reason for this<br />

concern has been studies showing that DHP calcium antagonists do not reliably reduce proteinuria,<br />

or in some instances may increase proteinuria over and above baseline, when used as monotherapy.<br />

Some, though not all, studies show that renin angiotensin system (RAS)-based antihypertensive drug<br />

therapy preserves kidney function better than non-RAS containing antihypertensive drug regimens. 1,2<br />

In both the African American Study <strong>of</strong> Kidney Disease (AASK) 2 and the Irbesartan Diabetes<br />

Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) 1 DHP calcium antagonist-based antihypertensive drug therapy was a less<br />

effect active comparator against RAS-based antihypertensive therapy for the preservation <strong>of</strong> kidney<br />

function. There are physiologically plausible reasons for this observation.<br />

The renal microcirculation auto-regulates glomerular flow and pressure largely by constriction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the afferent arteriole when BP rises and dilation <strong>of</strong> the afferent arteriole when BP falls. DHP<br />

calcium antagonists interfere with micro-circulatory autoregulation <strong>of</strong> glomerular flow and pressure by<br />

preferentially dilating the afferent arteriole. Thus, when systemic pressure is not reduced to low levels,<br />

there will be greater transmission <strong>of</strong> potentially injurous systemic arterial pressure into the glomerulus.<br />

Nevertheless, the practitioner must interpret these studies as well as understand how well they<br />

inform routing clinical practice. There are very few situations where RAS blockade will not be included<br />

in the treatment regimen <strong>of</strong> patients with CKD given that virtually every authoritative <strong>hypertension</strong><br />

guideline recommends RAS blockade as preferred therapy in these patients. Given the proven<br />

treatment resistance to pharmacological BP lowering in CKD, especially proteinuric CKD, the vast<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> them will require multi-drug therapy – <strong>of</strong>ten times more than three drugs. The RENAAL<br />

study provided insight into the how the combination <strong>of</strong> DHP calcium antagonists and RAS blockade<br />

(with the ARB losartan) worked in patients with diabetic nephropathy; there was no diminution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

renoprotective effect <strong>of</strong> losartan when used simultaneously with DHP calcium antagonists. 3 Also,<br />

there are other likely more important reasons for choosing a DHP than a non-DHP calcium antagonist<br />

in persons with CKD than their effects as monotherapy on proteinuria. For example, in a patient<br />

also taking/requiring beta blockade, a commonly used antihypertensive drug class, the use <strong>of</strong> a DHP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!