11.04.2013 Views

Some notes on the Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest Of South India

Some notes on the Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest Of South India

Some notes on the Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest Of South India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Study<br />

The study that this paper is based up<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>ducted from March 1993 - April 2000<br />

and involved surveys of 37 sites. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas have been thoroughly surveyed by systematic<br />

methods, e.g. Marakanam, but for <strong>the</strong> vast majority species lists showing presence or absence<br />

were collated for <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>on</strong> multiple visits. Specimens from each geographical area were<br />

collected in flowering and fruiting stage and <strong>the</strong> specimens are stored in <strong>the</strong> herbarium in<br />

Auroville. The identificati<strong>on</strong>s were verified by visiting botanists.<br />

The surveys were c<strong>on</strong>ducted by a group of people ranging in size from 3-7, walking through<br />

<strong>the</strong> areas and identifying species; unknown species were collected for subsequent<br />

identificati<strong>on</strong>. All angiosperms were noted.<br />

Analysis of survey data<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> surveys were arranged in a database and <strong>the</strong> survey locati<strong>on</strong>s were<br />

sorted into site types, ei<strong>the</strong>r as groves (13 sites), plains forests (7 sites), or hillocks (17 sites).<br />

Percentage occurrence was calculated for each species with respect to each site type. This<br />

value, al<strong>on</strong>g with o<strong>the</strong>r field observati<strong>on</strong>s, was used to ascribe a ranking for each species<br />

with respect to each site type<br />

The ranking was as follows:<br />

1 – comm<strong>on</strong>ly associated with <strong>the</strong> site type<br />

2 – occasi<strong>on</strong>ally associated with <strong>the</strong> site type<br />

3 – rarely associated with <strong>the</strong> site type<br />

0 – not associated with <strong>the</strong> site type<br />

If <strong>the</strong> species had a ranking of 1 or 2 for each of <strong>the</strong> 3 site types <strong>the</strong>y were ascribed to <strong>the</strong><br />

core species of <strong>the</strong> TDEF. These species can be c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be <strong>the</strong> generalists.<br />

If a species was outside of this criteri<strong>on</strong> it was <strong>the</strong>n assigned to <strong>on</strong>e or more of <strong>the</strong> site types<br />

as comm<strong>on</strong> species if it had a rating of 1, or as an occasi<strong>on</strong>al species if it had a rating of 2.<br />

These species can be c<strong>on</strong>sidered as specialists that are adapted to, or require, some specific<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental c<strong>on</strong>straint or c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Field observati<strong>on</strong>s were <strong>the</strong>n used to ascribe species to a fur<strong>the</strong>r 4 site types: Coastal,<br />

Riverine, Tank bunds, and Wayside.<br />

The full list is given in table 1 of plants ascribed a place in any of <strong>the</strong> site types.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!