Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with (ellipsis) Christ (Pred. Nom.; spiritual self-esteem in<br />
Gate 6), likewise (adjunctive, comparative), dying (avpoqnh,|skw,<br />
AAInf., Culminative, a gerund used as the subj. of a verb,<br />
Articular; "to have died") is (ellipsis) gain (Pred. Nom.;<br />
advantageous, profitable, interest earned on the principal).<br />
WHO <strong>Philippians</strong> 1:21 evmoi. ga.r to. zh/n Cristo.j kai. to. avpoqanei/n ke,rdoj<br />
VUL <strong>Philippians</strong> 1:21 mihi enim vivere Christus est et mori lucrum<br />
LWB Philp. 1:22 But since this living in the flesh is for me the fruit of [additional] production<br />
[rewards], then I do not know which one [living or dying] I should choose for myself.<br />
KW Philp. 1:22 But if for me [continued] life in this physical existence be my lot, this very thing<br />
[namely, continued life on earth] is that in which the fruit of my ministry will be involved and is<br />
the condition of that fruit being produced.<br />
KJV<br />
<strong>Philippians</strong> 1:22 But if I live in the flesh, this is the fruit of my labour: yet what I shall<br />
choose I wot not.<br />
TRANSLATION HIGHLIGHTS<br />
Even though Paul sees happiness in either continuing to live or to die and be face-to-face with<br />
Christ, he does realize that is he continues to live (Static Present tense), he has the opportunity of<br />
producing more fruit for the Lord. This fruit or spiritual production would also mean additional<br />
rewards for him at the Judgment Seat of Christ. So Paul does not know (Tendential Present tense)<br />
whether he should choose (Deliberative Future tense) continued life on earth or dying and being in<br />
the presence of the Lord. Paul is in a philosophical quandary. Now let me ask you a few questions. If<br />
Paul was facing death, and the after-life he expected was to be “asleep” for a couple thousand years,<br />
would he be in a quandary? There is no benefit in dying today if you are merely going to be asleep<br />
for an unknown period of time.<br />
If you had the choice of living and continuing to produce fruit or dying and being in a limbo state for<br />
years, would you find it tough to choose between the two? The reason Paul was having a problem<br />
deciding which was better was because he knew that after he died he would be face-to-face with<br />
Christ. That fact makes the whole decision-making process more complicated, doesn’t it? We do not<br />
fear death because we know that we will be immediately in the presence of the Lord afterwards. The<br />
Bible teaches the exact opposite of an intermediate, sleeping state. Soul sleep, also known as<br />
psychopannychia, is a heresy; John Calvin destroyed such nonsense (in a book bearing the same<br />
name) centuries ago.<br />
REVELANT OPINIONS<br />
Paul is tossed to and fro between the desire to labour for Christ here on earth and the desire to be