Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis

Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis

versebyverse.com
from versebyverse.com More from this publisher
11.04.2013 Views

imprisonments and in the defense [legal plea: Not Guilty of any crime] and the confirmation of the good news [when presenting the gospel & related doctrines to Nero’s court], all of you being partners during this practical application of grace [sharing in Paul’s accomplishments because they helped sustain his ministry financially]. KW Philp. 1:7 Even as it is only just and right on my part to be constantly turning my mind in the direction of this very thing in behalf of all of you [namely, the completion of God’s good work in you], because you are holding me in your heart both in my defense and in my confirmation of the good news, all of you being sharers with me in this grace, KJV Philippians 1:7 Even as it is meet for me to think this of you all, because I have you in my heart; inasmuch as both in my bonds, and in the defence and confirmation of the gospel, ye all are partakers of my grace. TRANSLATION HIGHLIGHTS Paul holds a highly favorable opinion of the Philippians believers, not because of emotion, but because he has considered all the evidence with clear objective thinking (Perfective Present tense) and he believes he has come to a just and accurate assessment (Gnomic Present tense) of their spiritual status. The Infinitive of Conceived Result points to his entertaining thoughts about them and his eventual conclusion that they will share in the rewards from his ministry in Rome. The believers in Philippi are Paul’s favorite congregation, in my opinion, because of several references to them in tender terms. When Paul holds a group of believers “in the mentality of his soul” while he is in prison, you can be sure that they are a special group of believers. In his time of deprivation, he remembers those believers with whom he has spiritual rapport based on doctrine. Paul remembers them while living in prison. He remembers them while preparing and giving his defense (Greek: apologetics) in court. He will, of course, plead “Not Guilty” because he committed no crime. He remembers them while presenting the gospel and related Christian doctrines (confirmation) to Nero and others in court. And because they have been so financially generous in supporting his ministry, he calls them “partners” in grace (Descriptive Present tense). They will share in his accomplishments because their grace giving to his ministry was a practical application of the doctrine they had learned from him. The reality or truth of grace can often be seen in how a person applies the truth they have learned. Some applications of doctrine are invisible; other applications of doctrine are visible. The Philippians’ application of the doctrine of grace giving was quite visible to Paul and he has been repeatedly touched by their response to his needs. There are some grammarians who take the Granville Sharp Rule too seriously and too rigidly. It is, of course, a rule invented by man, not God. This is one of many places where the rule should be rejected, because “defense” and “confirmation” are not one and the same concepts. “The fallacy lies in assuming the universal validity of the strict form of the Granville Sharp rule. As I have shown elsewhere, only one article governs both nouns in expressions such as “the defense and confirmation of the gospel” (Phil. 1:7) and “the Epicureans and Stoics” (Acts 17:18). The fallacy is in taking this

ule too absolutely. If one article governs two substantives joined by ‘kai,’ it does not necessarily follow that the two substantives refer to the same thing, but only that the two substantives are grouped together to function in some respects as an entity. Thus, if God has called us ‘unto His kingdom and glory’ in I Thess. 2:12 we are not to understand that kingdom and glory are identical, but that kingdom and glory must be taken together as a package, in this case a package referring to the eschatological blessing comprehensively summarized by the two nouns in tandem.” (D.A. Carson, A.T. Robertson) REVELANT OPINIONS While Christ is the source of the believer's joy (inner happiness), the mind is the channel through which that joy comes into the experience of the child of God. So Paul has a great deal to say about the mind. (J.D. Pentecost) The way one thinks is intimately related to the way one behaves. A person’s thinking and striving cannot be seen in isolation from the overall direction of his or her life. (P. O’Brien) “Phroneo” expresses not merely an activity of the intellect, but also a movement of the will; it is both interest and decision at the same time. (J. Goetzmann) The word “defense” is a Greek judicial term referring to an attorney talking his client off from a charge, thus presenting a verbal defense. Paul was defending the Faith before the tribunal of the world, Nero’s throne. A successful defense would result in the gospel being confirmed, that is, made stable in the sense that its claims would be shown to be true. (K. Wuest) This closeness of fellowship is based upon a common participation in the grace of God, and a deep sense of oneness even though the apostle and the church are separated by distance. (R. P. Martin) He cherishes them in his heart because he knows that whether he is in prison and arraigned before his judges or engaged in some other defense and confirmation of the gospel, they are partakers with him in God’s grace and committed to his ministry. They were not ashamed or intimidated by his imprisonment, but helped to alleviate his needs and so cooperated with him in the defense and propagation of the gospel. (P. O’Brien) In the Roman court, he acted as a representative for all the churches. He thought of them through what he said (defense) and what he did (confirmation). (R. Gromacki) Perhaps it is best to take “kardia” here not so much as the seat of the softer feelings, but rather as the abode of the stronger thoughts, resolutions, etc. (W.R. Nicoll) As “apologia” implies the negative side of the Apostle’s preaching, the preparatory process of removing obstacles and prejudices, so “bebaiosis” denotes the positive or aggressive side, the direct advancement and establishment of the gospel. The two together will thus comprise all modes of preaching and extending the truth. (J. Lightfoot) “Apologia” is the regular term for what the defendant pleads in a court trial or before a judge. Since it is here combined under one article with “bebaiosis,” another term with a reference to a court in this combination, we are sure that Paul is referring to his trial. The imperial court not only wanted Paul’s plea in his defense (the apologia) but together with it the confirmation (the bebaiosis), the factual proofs that would be convincing to the judge or judges. Both are regular legal terms ... This grace is the grace of God which was using Paul as a prisoner for so long, was now at last using him at the imperial trial in the defense and the confirmation of the gospel before the supreme court, “to bear Christ’s Name before the Gentiles and kings.” (R. Lenski) At Rome the apostle remained for

ule too absolutely. If one article governs two substantives joined <strong>by</strong> ‘kai,’ it does not necessarily<br />

follow that the two substantives refer to the same thing, but only that the two substantives are<br />

grouped together to function in some respects as an entity. Thus, if God has called us ‘unto His<br />

kingdom and glory’ in I Thess. 2:12 we are not to understand that kingdom and glory are identical,<br />

but that kingdom and glory must be taken together as a package, in this case a package referring to<br />

the eschatological blessing comprehensively summarized <strong>by</strong> the two nouns in tandem.” (D.A.<br />

Carson, A.T. Robertson)<br />

REVELANT OPINIONS<br />

While Christ is the source of the believer's joy (inner happiness), the mind is the channel through<br />

which that joy comes into the experience of the child of God. So Paul has a great deal to say about<br />

the mind. (J.D. Pentecost) The way one thinks is intimately related to the way one behaves. A<br />

person’s thinking and striving cannot be seen in isolation from the overall direction of his or her life.<br />

(P. O’Brien) “Phroneo” expresses not merely an activity of the intellect, but also a movement of the<br />

will; it is both interest and decision at the same time. (J. Goetzmann) The word “defense” is a Greek<br />

judicial term referring to an attorney talking his client off from a charge, thus presenting a verbal<br />

defense. Paul was defending the Faith before the tribunal of the world, Nero’s throne. A successful<br />

defense would result in the gospel being confirmed, that is, made stable in the sense that its claims<br />

would be shown to be true. (K. Wuest) This closeness of fellowship is based upon a common<br />

participation in the grace of God, and a deep sense of oneness even though the apostle and the<br />

church are separated <strong>by</strong> distance. (R. P. Martin)<br />

He cherishes them in his heart because he knows that whether he is in prison and arraigned before<br />

his judges or engaged in some other defense and confirmation of the gospel, they are partakers with<br />

him in God’s grace and committed to his ministry. They were not ashamed or intimidated <strong>by</strong> his<br />

imprisonment, but helped to alleviate his needs and so cooperated with him in the defense and<br />

propagation of the gospel. (P. O’Brien) In the Roman court, he acted as a representative for all the<br />

churches. He thought of them through what he said (defense) and what he did (confirmation). (R.<br />

Gromacki) Perhaps it is best to take “kardia” here not so much as the seat of the softer feelings, but<br />

rather as the abode of the stronger thoughts, resolutions, etc. (W.R. Nicoll) As “apologia” implies the<br />

negative side of the Apostle’s preaching, the preparatory process of removing obstacles and<br />

prejudices, so “bebaiosis” denotes the positive or aggressive side, the direct advancement and<br />

establishment of the gospel. The two together will thus comprise all modes of preaching and<br />

extending the truth. (J. Lightfoot)<br />

“Apologia” is the regular term for what the defendant pleads in a court trial or before a judge. Since<br />

it is here combined under one article with “bebaiosis,” another term with a reference to a court in<br />

this combination, we are sure that Paul is referring to his trial. The imperial court not only wanted<br />

Paul’s plea in his defense (the apologia) but together with it the confirmation (the bebaiosis), the<br />

factual proofs that would be convincing to the judge or judges. Both are regular legal terms ... This<br />

grace is the grace of God which was using Paul as a prisoner for so long, was now at last using him<br />

at the imperial trial in the defense and the confirmation of the gospel before the supreme court, “to<br />

bear Christ’s Name before the Gentiles and kings.” (R. Lenski) At Rome the apostle remained for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!