11.04.2013 Views

Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis

Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis

Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LWB Philp. 2:27 For truly he was so critically ill that he nearly died, but God had mercy on<br />

him, and not only him, but also me [blessing <strong>by</strong> association], so that I might not have<br />

sorrow upon sorrow [excessive grief].<br />

KW Philp. 2:27 For truly he was ill, next door to death. But God had mercy upon him, and not<br />

upon him alone, but also on me, in order that I might not have sorrow upon sorrow.<br />

KJV <strong>Philippians</strong> 2:27 For indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not<br />

on him only, but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.<br />

TRANSLATION HIGHLIGHTS<br />

In actuality, the rumour the <strong>Philippians</strong> had heard about Epaphroditus was correct; he was so<br />

critically ill (Dramatic Aorist tense) that he almost died (Latin: mortem). Paul uses a hapax<br />

legomena that means Epaphroditus “resembled death.” But God had mercy on him (Culminative<br />

Aorist tense) and healed him. And not only did He have mercy on Epaphroditus, but He also had<br />

mercy on Paul <strong>by</strong> healing Epaphroditus. Paul received a blessing <strong>by</strong> his association with<br />

Epaphroditus; if something terrible would have happened to him, Paul would have been<br />

devastated. It’s also possible that Epaphroditus received a blessing <strong>by</strong> association from Paul,<br />

because the Lord allowed Epaphroditus to befriend the apostle and learn from him firsthand. God<br />

spared Epaphroditus and in turn also spared Paul from having (Culminative Aorist tense) grief<br />

on top of grief. If Epaphroditus would have died, Paul would have grieved for his loss of a dear<br />

friend and for the Philippian believers who sent him to Rome.<br />

REVELANT OPINIONS<br />

This verse implies that the previous statement that Epaphroditus had become ill was really an<br />

understatement. It had not been exaggerated in earlier reports. (J. Lightfoot) This marvelous<br />

recovery was due to a sovereign merciful act of God Himself. (J.F. Collange) Paul himself did not<br />

miraculously heal Epaphroditus, but rather regarded the recovery as an intervention of God. The gift<br />

of healing had been removed, discontinued. (H.A. Kent) He and death were next door neighbors. (K.<br />

Wuest) Why did not the apostle heal him, who was endued with a power of curing diseases, as well<br />

as raising the dead? Perhaps the apostle had not that power at all times, and at his own discretion, but<br />

only when some great end was to be served <strong>by</strong> it, and when God saw fit. (M. Henry)<br />

There is no indication that Paul had the ability to heal him or that he tried to do so. (R. Lightner)<br />

Epaphroditus’ sickness proves that the apostles had not the permanent gift of miracles any more than<br />

inspiration: both were vouchsafed only for each occasion, as the Spirit thought fit. (R. Jamieson) On<br />

the day the Church Age began, temporary gifts accompanied the divine dynashpere. Initially the<br />

ministry of the Spirit included functions that have since ceased to legitimately exist. In the Scriptures<br />

we must distinguish these overt, temporary ministries of the Spirit from His invisible, permanent<br />

ministries if we are to avoid the trap of emotional arrogance. We must “rightly divide the Word of<br />

truth” in order to execute God’s game plan for our lives. (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!