Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
Philippians - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LWB Philp. 2:27 For truly he was so critically ill that he nearly died, but God had mercy on<br />
him, and not only him, but also me [blessing <strong>by</strong> association], so that I might not have<br />
sorrow upon sorrow [excessive grief].<br />
KW Philp. 2:27 For truly he was ill, next door to death. But God had mercy upon him, and not<br />
upon him alone, but also on me, in order that I might not have sorrow upon sorrow.<br />
KJV <strong>Philippians</strong> 2:27 For indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not<br />
on him only, but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.<br />
TRANSLATION HIGHLIGHTS<br />
In actuality, the rumour the <strong>Philippians</strong> had heard about Epaphroditus was correct; he was so<br />
critically ill (Dramatic Aorist tense) that he almost died (Latin: mortem). Paul uses a hapax<br />
legomena that means Epaphroditus “resembled death.” But God had mercy on him (Culminative<br />
Aorist tense) and healed him. And not only did He have mercy on Epaphroditus, but He also had<br />
mercy on Paul <strong>by</strong> healing Epaphroditus. Paul received a blessing <strong>by</strong> his association with<br />
Epaphroditus; if something terrible would have happened to him, Paul would have been<br />
devastated. It’s also possible that Epaphroditus received a blessing <strong>by</strong> association from Paul,<br />
because the Lord allowed Epaphroditus to befriend the apostle and learn from him firsthand. God<br />
spared Epaphroditus and in turn also spared Paul from having (Culminative Aorist tense) grief<br />
on top of grief. If Epaphroditus would have died, Paul would have grieved for his loss of a dear<br />
friend and for the Philippian believers who sent him to Rome.<br />
REVELANT OPINIONS<br />
This verse implies that the previous statement that Epaphroditus had become ill was really an<br />
understatement. It had not been exaggerated in earlier reports. (J. Lightfoot) This marvelous<br />
recovery was due to a sovereign merciful act of God Himself. (J.F. Collange) Paul himself did not<br />
miraculously heal Epaphroditus, but rather regarded the recovery as an intervention of God. The gift<br />
of healing had been removed, discontinued. (H.A. Kent) He and death were next door neighbors. (K.<br />
Wuest) Why did not the apostle heal him, who was endued with a power of curing diseases, as well<br />
as raising the dead? Perhaps the apostle had not that power at all times, and at his own discretion, but<br />
only when some great end was to be served <strong>by</strong> it, and when God saw fit. (M. Henry)<br />
There is no indication that Paul had the ability to heal him or that he tried to do so. (R. Lightner)<br />
Epaphroditus’ sickness proves that the apostles had not the permanent gift of miracles any more than<br />
inspiration: both were vouchsafed only for each occasion, as the Spirit thought fit. (R. Jamieson) On<br />
the day the Church Age began, temporary gifts accompanied the divine dynashpere. Initially the<br />
ministry of the Spirit included functions that have since ceased to legitimately exist. In the Scriptures<br />
we must distinguish these overt, temporary ministries of the Spirit from His invisible, permanent<br />
ministries if we are to avoid the trap of emotional arrogance. We must “rightly divide the Word of<br />
truth” in order to execute God’s game plan for our lives. (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)