2 Peter - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
2 Peter - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis 2 Peter - Verse-by-Verse Biblical Exegesis
natures not lead them into the snare of sin. In that sin they would find no peace and satisfaction. In fact, they would experience less peace than at any time before their commitment to Christ. “The latter things have become worse for them than the former.” In fact, if they again are caught up into a life of carnality, “it could almost be better for them not to have come to know the way of righteousness,” if it is fulfillment and thrills they seek. (D. Dunham) If a mature Christian, therefore, returns to corrupt behavior after walking in the path of righteousness, his time on that righteous pathway will prove counterproductive. Since a fall from that pathway leads to deeper degradation in sin, the time spent on the Christian road has led to a worse result than otherwise would have been the case. (Z. Hodges) 2 Peter 2:21 By all means (inferential; certainly), it would almost have been (eivmi, Imperf.AI3S, Desiderative) better (Pred. Nom.; preferable) for them (Dat. Adv.; false teachers and their reversionistic followers) to have never (neg. particle) fully known (evpiginw,skw, Perf.AInf., Intensive, Inf. as Dir. Obj. Of Verb) the way (Acc. Dir. Obj.; road to) of righteousness (Gen. Spec.; the protocol plan of God for the Church Age believer), than (comparative), having fully known (evpiginw,skw, AAPtc.DMP, Gnomic, Attributive) it (ellipsis; having lived the Christian way of life for a considerable period of time), to have turned away (u`postre,fw, AAInf., Culminative, Results; in reverse-process reversionism) from the holy (Descr. Gen.) mandate (Abl. Separation; to walk in the Spirit) which had been delivered (paradi,dwmi, APPtc.GFS, Constative, Attributive; by God in His Word, through His legitimate teachers) to them (Dat. Adv.). BGT 2 Peter 2:21 krei/tton ga.r h=n auvtoi/j mh. evpegnwke,nai th.n o`do.n th/j dikaiosu,nhj h' evpignou/sin u`postre,yai evk th/j paradoqei,shj auvtoi/j a`gi,aj evntolh/jÅ VUL 2 Peter 2:21 melius enim erat illis non cognoscere viam iustitiae quam post agnitionem retrorsum converti ab eo quod illis traditum est sancto mandato LWB 2 Peter 2:22 It is happening to them [the false teachers and their reversionistic followers] according to the true proverb: The dog returned to his own vomit and the sow which had cleaned itself to mud wallowing. KW 2 Peter 2:22 But it has happened to them according to the true saying: a dog returns to his own vomit, and a sow, having been bathed, to its rolling in mire. KJV 2 Peter 2:22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. TRANSLATION HIGHLIGHTS
According to the previous verse, the false teachers and their reversionistic followers had a full knowledge of the way of righteousness and had lived the Christian way of life for some time. But in their arrogance and negative volition, they turned away from the truth and embraced the heresy and depraved lifestyle of the cosmic system. So it was happening to them (Intensive Perfect tense) just as the true proverb or maxim stated: “The dog returned to his vomit and the sow which had cleaned itself to mud wallowing.” Maybe it doesn’t mean much, but “dog” is in the masculine and “sow” is in the feminine. The dog is polluted on the inside, the sow is polluted on the outside. Both animals had gotten rid of their own brand of filth, but both returned to the very filth they had previously rejected. This is a perfect metaphor, partially from Proverbs 26:11 and perhaps the rest from Hellenestic Jewish proverbs, that describes reverse-process reversionism. In this context, believers are living like dogs and hogs even though they are truly His sheep. As positive Christians they turned from their sins and walked “the way of righteousness” for awhile, but as negative Christians they returned to their sins old with relish. There is a big difference between a dirty sheep and a filthy sow. Note: I did not put a comma in this passage before the word “and” because that would make it two proverbs instead of one proverb – and proverb is singular in the Greek. Again, the false teachers and their followers are Christians. Once upon a time they had an epignosis of the truth; unbelievers never have an epignosis of the truth. Some commentators ignore all the references in 2 Peter that require the false teachers to be Christians. They cannot imagine a believer choosing to live like a dog or a hog, although I have personally known dozens (if not hundreds) who are doing that very thing!. Either they have lived in an ivory tower too long or they are totally divorced from reality. Christians who are not following the protocol plan of God for the Church Age can self-destruct and enter polarized fragmentation. One pole is legalism, the other pole is antinomianism. These believers are destroying themselves by engaging in antinomian behavior. The early church had this same problem. They had “great difficulty understanding how a Christian once converted would ever deliberately turn away from the gospel and leave the community (Hebrews 6:4-6) … To throw this life of love aside and to turn back to a senseless life of indulgence is the awful tragedy 2 Peter struggles with. This regression is its own punishment.” (D. Senior) It is the fact that they once were growing Christians, with an epignosis (full knowledge) of the “way of righteousness” that makes this such a painful issue for Peter in the first place! The “way of righteousness” can only be lived by a Christian because it requires the indwelling and filling of the Holy Spirit, which unbelievers do not have. The central tragedy and warning of this entire epistle is that some Christians can become false teachers and actually entice other Christians to join them in sin! There are hundreds of warnings in the NT directed toward weak or newlyconverted Christians. If there was no chance that a believer could fall into any of these sins, why would God spend so much time warning believers to avoid them? Hello? You present the gospel to unbelievers, you don’t warn them about bad behavior. RELEVANT OPINIONS
- Page 59 and 60: possibilities of our becoming "lose
- Page 61 and 62: The sovereign grace of God which ac
- Page 63 and 64: A clear meaning of agorazo stands o
- Page 65 and 66: (evpa,gw, PAPtc.NMP, Gnomic, Result
- Page 67 and 68: maligned (blasfhme,w, FPI3S, Predic
- Page 69 and 70: Predictive, Deponent; make a quick
- Page 71 and 72: infiltration of evil into the belie
- Page 73 and 74: of their large numbers? (K. Gangel)
- Page 75 and 76: This form of judgment was by “red
- Page 77 and 78: that they are Christians ... Even a
- Page 79 and 80: chose to live in Jordan’s fertile
- Page 81 and 82: In my opinion, Peter returns to the
- Page 83 and 84: occasionally occurs whether we unde
- Page 85 and 86: VUL 2 Peter 2:10 magis autem eos qu
- Page 87 and 88: Three times in as many verses Peter
- Page 89 and 90: scintillating, emotionally stimulat
- Page 91 and 92: as “stains” on the church and
- Page 93 and 94: people through false prophecy for m
- Page 95 and 96: VUL 2 Peter 2:15 derelinquentes rec
- Page 97 and 98: (Latin: turbine) by a gale-force wh
- Page 99 and 100: created them. In some cases, the lu
- Page 101 and 102: comes on the scene without proper t
- Page 103 and 104: The antithesis of freedom-slavery i
- Page 105 and 106: worries.” But these are precisely
- Page 107 and 108: LWB 2 Peter 2:21 By all means, it w
- Page 109: “way of righteousness.” Their i
- Page 113 and 114: Christian turns back to sinful habi
- Page 115 and 116: sense, without falsehoods) mind (Ac
- Page 117 and 118: scoffing of religious truths and pr
- Page 119 and 120: out divine intervention in the univ
- Page 121 and 122: will also be so after the judgment
- Page 123 and 124: We now see how egregiously they err
- Page 125 and 126: 2 Peter 3:7 But (contrast) now (Adv
- Page 127 and 128: 2 Peter 3:8 But (adversative) do no
- Page 129 and 130: (A. Knoch) While unbelievers surely
- Page 131 and 132: and stubble) and other production.
- Page 133 and 134: The verb ought indicates that a div
- Page 135 and 136: He alone will have the privilege of
- Page 137 and 138: VUL 2 Peter 3:13 novos vero caelos
- Page 139 and 140: most serious thing not to fulfill G
- Page 141 and 142: undisciplined in habits of thought,
- Page 143 and 144: - note that he does not say, “fal
- Page 145 and 146: LWB 2 Peter 3:18 But [rather] keep
- Page 147 and 148: grace) and (connective) the knowled
- Page 149 and 150: 2 Peter, Duane F. Watson, The New I
- Page 151: New Testament Repentance: Repentanc
According to the previous verse, the false teachers and their reversionistic followers had<br />
a full knowledge of the way of righteousness and had lived the Christian way of life for<br />
some time. But in their arrogance and negative volition, they turned away from the truth<br />
and embraced the heresy and depraved lifestyle of the cosmic system. So it was<br />
happening to them (Intensive Perfect tense) just as the true proverb or maxim stated:<br />
“The dog returned to his vomit and the sow which had cleaned itself to mud wallowing.”<br />
Maybe it doesn’t mean much, but “dog” is in the masculine and “sow” is in the feminine.<br />
The dog is polluted on the inside, the sow is polluted on the outside. Both animals had<br />
gotten rid of their own brand of filth, but both returned to the very filth they had<br />
previously rejected. This is a perfect metaphor, partially from Proverbs 26:11 and<br />
perhaps the rest from Hellenestic Jewish proverbs, that describes reverse-process<br />
reversionism. In this context, believers are living like dogs and hogs even though they are<br />
truly His sheep.<br />
As positive Christians they turned from their sins and walked “the way of righteousness”<br />
for awhile, but as negative Christians they returned to their sins old with relish. There is a<br />
big difference between a dirty sheep and a filthy sow. Note: I did not put a comma in this<br />
passage before the word “and” because that would make it two proverbs instead of one<br />
proverb – and proverb is singular in the Greek. Again, the false teachers and their<br />
followers are Christians. Once upon a time they had an epignosis of the truth; unbelievers<br />
never have an epignosis of the truth. Some commentators ignore all the references in 2<br />
<strong>Peter</strong> that require the false teachers to be Christians. They cannot imagine a believer<br />
choosing to live like a dog or a hog, although I have personally known dozens (if not<br />
hundreds) who are doing that very thing!. Either they have lived in an ivory tower too<br />
long or they are totally divorced from reality. Christians who are not following the<br />
protocol plan of God for the Church Age can self-destruct and enter polarized<br />
fragmentation. One pole is legalism, the other pole is antinomianism. These believers are<br />
destroying themselves <strong>by</strong> engaging in antinomian behavior.<br />
The early church had this same problem. They had “great difficulty understanding how a<br />
Christian once converted would ever deliberately turn away from the gospel and leave<br />
the community (Hebrews 6:4-6) … To throw this life of love aside and to turn back to a<br />
senseless life of indulgence is the awful tragedy 2 <strong>Peter</strong> struggles with. This regression is<br />
its own punishment.” (D. Senior) It is the fact that they once were growing Christians,<br />
with an epignosis (full knowledge) of the “way of righteousness” that makes this such a<br />
painful issue for <strong>Peter</strong> in the first place! The “way of righteousness” can only be lived <strong>by</strong><br />
a Christian because it requires the indwelling and filling of the Holy Spirit, which<br />
unbelievers do not have. The central tragedy and warning of this entire epistle is that<br />
some Christians can become false teachers and actually entice other Christians to join<br />
them in sin! There are hundreds of warnings in the NT directed toward weak or newlyconverted<br />
Christians. If there was no chance that a believer could fall into any of these<br />
sins, why would God spend so much time warning believers to avoid them? Hello? You<br />
present the gospel to unbelievers, you don’t warn them about bad behavior.<br />
RELEVANT OPINIONS