11.04.2013 Views

Attitudes Toward Suicide Among Chinese People in Hong Kong

Attitudes Toward Suicide Among Chinese People in Hong Kong

Attitudes Toward Suicide Among Chinese People in Hong Kong

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Suicide</strong> and Life-Threaten<strong>in</strong>g Behavior 37(5) October 2007<br />

© 2007 The American Association of Suicidology<br />

<strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>Among</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

<strong>People</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

S<strong>in</strong>g Lee, MB BS, FRCPsych, Adley Tsang, BSSc, Xian-yun Li, BMed, MPH,<br />

Michael Robert Phillips, MD, MA, MPH, and Arthur Kle<strong>in</strong>man, MD, MA<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce suicide <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> people exhibits certa<strong>in</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ctive characteristics,<br />

it is important to develop <strong>in</strong>digenous measures to assess <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> attitudes toward<br />

suicide that may be used to <strong>in</strong>form suicide reduction programs. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g qualitative<br />

and quantitative methods, we developed a <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> version of the <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

Attitude toward <strong>Suicide</strong> Questionnaire (CASQ-HK) which assesses attitudes<br />

toward suicide, suicidal <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation under 12 hypothetical scenarios, and prior suicidal<br />

experience. A convenience sample of 1,226 people completed the self-report<br />

questionnaire. In keep<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> tradition, respondents revealed both tolerant<br />

and condemn<strong>in</strong>g attitudes that varied with their sociodemographic characteristics.<br />

Generally, they were not strongly <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to consider suicide <strong>in</strong> the presence<br />

of difficult scenarios. Female gender, older age, and the presence of suicidal ideation<br />

were associated with more contemplation of suicide.<br />

Research on suicide <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society has data was not available until about a decade<br />

attracted <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>terest for several rea- ago (Lee & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005). Second, consons.<br />

First, suicide <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a was previously a trary to the contemporary medical depiction<br />

forbidden topic of research so that reliable of suicide as be<strong>in</strong>g due to treatable mental<br />

diseases, suicide has long been endorsed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society. In a scholarly analysis of sui-<br />

S<strong>in</strong>g Lee is Professor, Department of Psy- cide <strong>in</strong> pre-modern Ch<strong>in</strong>a, L<strong>in</strong> (1990) even<br />

chiatry; Adley Tsang is with the <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

Mood Disorders Center at The <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> University<br />

of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> <strong>in</strong> Shat<strong>in</strong>, <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>; Xian-<br />

yun Li is with the Beij<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Suicide</strong> Research and<br />

Prevention Center, and Michael Robert Phil-<br />

described suicide to be “a hallmark of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

culture.” For example, suicide was connected<br />

with the chang<strong>in</strong>g of dynasties, wars,<br />

corrupt emperors, women’s defense of chaslips<br />

is Executive Director, Beij<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Suicide</strong> Re- tity, and the seek<strong>in</strong>g of ghostly vengeance<br />

search and Prevention Center at the Beij<strong>in</strong>g Hui<br />

Long Guan Hospital; and Arthur Kle<strong>in</strong>man is<br />

the Esther and Sidney Rabb Professor of Anthropology,<br />

Department of Anthropology, at Harvard<br />

University.<br />

upon the liv<strong>in</strong>g (Hsieh & Spence, 1981; Wolf,<br />

1975). Third, despite the high value <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong><br />

people place on social cohesion and the de-<br />

monstrably low rates of depression and alco-<br />

This research was supported by grant holism <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> communities (Shen et al.,<br />

#CUHK4380/00H from the Research Grant<br />

Council of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> and the <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

Mood Disorders Center of The <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> University<br />

of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>.<br />

We also thank Lydia Chan and Alice Chiu<br />

2006), the rate of suicide <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is def<strong>in</strong>itely<br />

high by global standard (Phillips, Li, &<br />

Zhang, 2002). Likewise, although there has<br />

been a noticeable recovery from economic<br />

for their help with this study. recession, the suicide rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> has<br />

Address correspondence to Professor S<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Lee, Director, <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> Mood Disorders Center,<br />

7A, Block E, Staff Quarters, Pr<strong>in</strong>ce of Wales<br />

Hospital, Shat<strong>in</strong>, NT, <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>; E-mail: s<strong>in</strong>glee<br />

@cuhk.edu.hk<br />

steadily <strong>in</strong>creased from 10.6/100,000 dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1981–1994 to 18.6/100,000 <strong>in</strong> 2003 ( Judi-<br />

ciary of the <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> Special Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

Region of the <strong>People</strong>’s Republic of<br />

491<br />

565


566 <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a [HKSAR], 2004; Census and Statistics <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> subjects (Phillips, 2004). This ver-<br />

Department of HKSAR, 2004).<br />

sion of the CASQ was then adapted for the<br />

Published research on suicide and at- present study after another round of n<strong>in</strong>e fotempted<br />

suicide <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> has focused cus groups conducted among <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> sub-<br />

on the analysis of trends, methods of suicide, jects <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>.<br />

risk factors, and its association with mental With written <strong>in</strong>formed consent, n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

disorders (Centre for <strong>Suicide</strong> Research and focus groups with a total of 82 participants<br />

Prevention, 2005). The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of these stud- (41 males and 41 females) were conducted <strong>in</strong><br />

ies are usually derived from a quantitative <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> <strong>in</strong> a quiet group room of a<br />

analysis of cl<strong>in</strong>ical or population data and university department from April 13 to June<br />

provide an <strong>in</strong>formative epidemiological pro- 7, 2002. Six of the groups consisted of people<br />

file of suicide. Nonetheless, they have limited of different age categories (namely, 15–19,<br />

explanatory power with regard to the cultural 20–26, 27–38, 39–50, 51–65 and 66 years or<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs of suicide among <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> people above, respectively). The other three groups<br />

(Hsieh & Spence, 1981; Lee & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, were composed of suicide attempters, health-<br />

2005; Wolf, 1975).<br />

care professionals, and policy-related per-<br />

Cultural mean<strong>in</strong>gs are l<strong>in</strong>ked to social sonnel.<br />

attitudes. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>dividuals draw upon cul- Dur<strong>in</strong>g the focus groups, we used<br />

tural representations of suicide when they open-ended questions to probe participants’<br />

contemplate, attempt, or commit suicide, perception of such issues as what suicide was,<br />

study<strong>in</strong>g public attitudes toward suicide may why it happened, how common it was, what<br />

help us elucidate the causes and patterns of k<strong>in</strong>d of people it affected, how it <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

suicide <strong>in</strong> a community (Lee & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, others, and what could be done to prevent it.<br />

2005). Attitud<strong>in</strong>al research may also shed We then presented 13 scenarios of fatal and<br />

light on theories of suicide <strong>in</strong> general. To nonfatal suicides to the participants. The sce-<br />

date, no systematic study of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> attitudes narios were about problems aris<strong>in</strong>g from love<br />

toward suicide has been carried out <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> relationships, chronic psychiatric illness, <strong>in</strong>-<br />

<strong>Kong</strong> or ma<strong>in</strong>land Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Thus, the authors law oppression, domestic violence, haunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(from <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, and Boston, MA, by ghosts, nonfilial children, repeated failures<br />

respectively) carried out a collaborative proj- <strong>in</strong> a college entry exam<strong>in</strong>ation, parental disect<br />

that comb<strong>in</strong>ed qualitative and quantita- approval of marriage, bus<strong>in</strong>ess failure, alcotive<br />

methods to assess attitudes toward suihol/gambl<strong>in</strong>g, unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed depression, tercide<br />

<strong>in</strong> several communities <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a m<strong>in</strong>al cancer, and impulsive wrist-slash<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. The present paper re- related to loss of face. Each focus group<br />

ports the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. lasted 2 hours. The sessions were taperecorded,<br />

transcribed, and analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g the QSR<br />

Nvivo text analysis software. From the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

themes the <strong>in</strong>vestigators derived by listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

METHOD to the tapes, the text analysis created n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Instrument<br />

primary nodes for content organization.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>cluded a general impression about<br />

suicide <strong>in</strong> society, personal attitudes toward<br />

The <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> Attitude <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> suicide, methods used, reasons for suicide,<br />

Questionnaire (CASQ) was generated on the perception of impulsivity, acceptance of sui-<br />

basis of text analysis (us<strong>in</strong>g QSR Nvivo softcide, and the consequence and prevention of<br />

ware) of 101 focus groups and 18 <strong>in</strong>-depth suicide. Subbranches of the content were <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

conducted by the ma<strong>in</strong>land aucluded <strong>in</strong> each node and the number of octhors<br />

(LX, MP). It was revised after two sub- currences was counted for each subbranch.<br />

sequent pilot tests of the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary scales Additional questions were derived from each<br />

<strong>in</strong> approximately 2,000 randomly selected subbranch that occurred frequently.<br />

492


Lee et al. 567<br />

The revised version of the <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> At- nese University of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> to their<br />

titude <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> Questionnaire–<strong>Hong</strong> friends and relatives. Informed consent was<br />

<strong>Kong</strong> (CASQ–HK, available upon request) obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the participants and confiden-<br />

consists of 98 items. It was pilot-tested with tiality and anonymity were assured. A total of<br />

96 <strong>in</strong>dividuals of varied sociodemographic 746 and 480 questionnaires were collected,<br />

background <strong>in</strong> August 2004. Further revi- respectively. The overall response rate was<br />

sions were then made so that the items would 81.7%. Statistical analysis was carried out<br />

convey their <strong>in</strong>tended mean<strong>in</strong>gs effectively.<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al version of the CASQ-HK consists<br />

of three parts. Part A is composed of 73<br />

with SPSS 13.0 for W<strong>in</strong>dows.<br />

statements about attitudes toward suicide on<br />

a 5-po<strong>in</strong>t Likert scale (1-greatly agree, 2-<br />

RESULTS<br />

agree, 3-neutral, 4-disagree, 5-greatly disagree).<br />

Part B <strong>in</strong>cludes 12 statements about<br />

Sociodemographic Characteristics<br />

12 difficult scenarios. Respondents were The demographic distribution of re-<br />

asked on a 5-po<strong>in</strong>t Likert scale (5–def<strong>in</strong>itely spondents is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The mean age<br />

consider, 4–very likely to consider, 3–probably of males was 36.3 years (SD = 15.2) and for<br />

consider, 2–probably not consider, and 1–def<strong>in</strong>itely females, 31.8 years (SD = 13.9). There were<br />

not consider) their likelihood of consider<strong>in</strong>g more males than females and most respon-<br />

suicide <strong>in</strong> those scenarios. Part C was composed<br />

of 13 items about sociodemographics<br />

dents reported no religious affiliation.<br />

and the presence of serious suicidal ideation,<br />

previous suicidal attempt, and hav<strong>in</strong>g known<br />

Reliability and Factor Analysis<br />

someone who attempted or committed sui- The Cronbach’s alpha of the CASQcide<br />

previously. Approval for the study was HK is 0.852. Part A of the CASQ-HK was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the research ethics committee factor analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal axis facof<br />

The <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> University of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. tor<strong>in</strong>g method with varimax rotation. A n<strong>in</strong>e-<br />

Ow<strong>in</strong>g to the sensitivity of the topic, several factor model, which together expla<strong>in</strong>ed 36.1%<br />

hotl<strong>in</strong>es for help-seek<strong>in</strong>g were provided at of the total variance, emerged as the most <strong>in</strong>-<br />

the end of the questionnaire. terpretable and could be considered an ade-<br />

Although we renamed the CASQ-HK quate representation of the data provided by<br />

as an <strong>in</strong>strument that exam<strong>in</strong>ed attitudes to- the sample of respondents. In Table 2 the<br />

ward life and death, our attempts to approach items with load<strong>in</strong>gs of more than 0.35 on any<br />

several organizations for data collection, such of the factors are displayed. The n<strong>in</strong>e factors<br />

as schools, corporations, and old age homes, perta<strong>in</strong>ed to negative appraisal, stigma, sui-<br />

were uniformly refused. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the ad- cidal spectrum, fatalism, social change, sup-<br />

m<strong>in</strong>istrators of those <strong>in</strong>stitutions, they were port, contagiousness, sympathy, and function.<br />

concerned that their study could evoke sui- Sixteen items (available from the authors<br />

cidal ideas among their students, staff, or <strong>in</strong>mates<br />

that they did not know how to handle.<br />

Survey Participants<br />

upon request) did not load on any factors.<br />

Variation of <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong><br />

Items on each of the n<strong>in</strong>e factors were<br />

We eventually recruited a convenience scored from 1 to 5, with a higher score <strong>in</strong>disample<br />

that was composed of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> people cat<strong>in</strong>g stronger disagreement. Items with op-<br />

born and liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. One thouposite mean<strong>in</strong>gs were reversely scored. These<br />

sand questionnaires were distributed to staff scores were tested us<strong>in</strong>g two-tailed t tests and<br />

members of a medium-sized trad<strong>in</strong>g com- ANOVA at the significance level of 0.05 to<br />

pany. Another 500 questionnaires were dis- compare differences across demographic sub-<br />

tributed by n<strong>in</strong>e student helpers of The Chi- groups (Table 3). Although males showed a<br />

493


568 <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

TABLE 1 Endorsement of <strong>Suicide</strong> Under Difficult<br />

Sociodemographic Profile of Respondents<br />

Life Scenarios<br />

Sociodemographic characteristics n % The likelihood of respondents consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suicide under hypothetical difficult life<br />

Gender<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Age (years)<br />

15–25<br />

26–50<br />

51–75<br />

Marital Status<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

667<br />

530<br />

503<br />

410<br />

229<br />

636<br />

55.7<br />

44.3<br />

44<br />

35.9<br />

20.1<br />

52.7<br />

scenarios is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4. There were six<br />

scenarios with mean scores higher than 2<br />

(probably not consider suicide). In descend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

order of the mean score, they were, namely,<br />

“be<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ally ill,” “hav<strong>in</strong>g a chronic psychiatric<br />

illness,” “be<strong>in</strong>g severely depressed,”<br />

“be<strong>in</strong>g a burden to others and feel<strong>in</strong>g hopeless<br />

about the future,” “be<strong>in</strong>g heavily <strong>in</strong>-<br />

Married 570 47.3 debted because of gambl<strong>in</strong>g,” and “not hav-<br />

Education <strong>in</strong>g anyone to provide f<strong>in</strong>ancial or emotional<br />

Primary or below 166 14.0 support <strong>in</strong> old age.” The six mean scores of<br />

Middle School 233 19.7 the same six scenarios were also significantly<br />

High School<br />

Tertiary or Above<br />

Religion<br />

Christianity<br />

Buddhism or Taoism<br />

Others<br />

None<br />

Employment<br />

254<br />

529<br />

192<br />

217<br />

12<br />

805<br />

21.5<br />

44.8<br />

15.7<br />

17.7<br />

1.0<br />

65.7<br />

lower than 3 (probably consider suicide). This<br />

suggests that respondents’ general <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

toward suicide <strong>in</strong> the hypothetical scenarios<br />

is not strong. Multivariate logistic regression<br />

on how sociodemographic variables relate to<br />

consideration of suicide <strong>in</strong> hypothetical scenarios<br />

shows that females (OR = 1.4) were<br />

Work<strong>in</strong>g 736 62.1 significantly more likely than males to con-<br />

Nonwork<strong>in</strong>g 40 3.3 sider suicide. Older respondents (51–75 years)<br />

Students 410 34.6 were more likely to consider suicide (OR =<br />

Occupation<br />

Professional<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

Skilled<br />

Nonskilled<br />

Personal monthly <strong>in</strong>come<br />

Less than US$641<br />

US$641–US$1,282<br />

US$1,283 or above<br />

134<br />

190<br />

112<br />

600<br />

576<br />

396<br />

250<br />

12.9<br />

18.3<br />

10.8<br />

57.9<br />

47.1<br />

32.4<br />

20.5<br />

2.3) than the youngest age group (below 25<br />

years). Respondents who had suicidal ideation<br />

(OR=2.3) were also more likely to consider<br />

suicide.<br />

The likelihood of consider<strong>in</strong>g suicide<br />

<strong>in</strong> hypothetical scenarios was compared to<br />

respondents’ report of suicide ideation and<br />

attempt. <strong>Among</strong> the respondents who reported<br />

that they would be “very likely to consider”<br />

or would “def<strong>in</strong>itely consider” suicide<br />

less negative appraisal of suicide than fe-<br />

males, they showed less sympathy toward suicidal<br />

people and less agreement that suicide<br />

had <strong>in</strong>strumental functions such as revenge.<br />

They were also less likely to differentiate sui-<br />

cide attempt from completed suicide. Nega-<br />

tive appraisal and fatalistic view of suicide decreased<br />

with age. Respondents who were<br />

<strong>in</strong> at least one hypothetical scenario, a substantial<br />

proportion had thought of suicide<br />

(20.8%) or had attempted suicide before<br />

(3.3%). Those who did not consider suicide<br />

seriously <strong>in</strong> the hypothetical scenarios were<br />

less likely to report suicidal thought (4.7%)<br />

or suicide attempt (1.3%).<br />

married, less educated, work<strong>in</strong>g, or believers<br />

<strong>in</strong> Buddhism or Taoism were less negative<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

and fatalistic about suicide. More educated<br />

respondents and more skilled workers were<br />

Diversity of <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong><br />

more likely to disagree that suicide is related The biased sampl<strong>in</strong>g notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

to social change.<br />

the present study revealed a diversity of atti-<br />

494


Lee et al. 569<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Factor Analysis of <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong><br />

Overall (36.1% of variance, alpha = 0.852) Load<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Factor 1 (Negative Appraisal: Negative appraisal of suicide)<br />

6.2% of variance, alpha = 0.394<br />

47. <strong>Suicide</strong> is a stupid act. 0.675<br />

10. <strong>Suicide</strong> is a totally irresponsible act. 0.628<br />

65. <strong>Suicide</strong> is an extremely timid act. 0.624<br />

36. <strong>Suicide</strong> can be a respectable act.* 0.587<br />

41. The suicide has a very selfish personality. 0.552<br />

7. <strong>Suicide</strong> can sometimes be a responsible act.* 0.535<br />

24. <strong>Suicide</strong> is a rational act.* 0.511<br />

52. <strong>Suicide</strong> deserves sympathy from others.* 0.456<br />

15. <strong>Suicide</strong> can sometimes be a courageous act.* 0.44<br />

27. <strong>Suicide</strong> reflects a person’s low self-esteem. 0.418<br />

12. <strong>Suicide</strong> is frustrat<strong>in</strong>g to others. 0.365<br />

18. <strong>Suicide</strong> is a betrayal to friends and families.<br />

17. Under most circumstances, we should not stop term<strong>in</strong>ally ill people from committ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.406<br />

suicide.* 0.363<br />

Factor 2 (Stigma: Stigmatization of suicide) 5.8% of variance, alpha=0.735<br />

58. Most people are afraid to develop relationships with those who have suicidal acts. 0.689<br />

5. Most people would avoid a person who attempted suicide. 0.637<br />

38. Most people would avoid the family of the suicide. 0.589<br />

46. <strong>People</strong> who had suicidal acts are disliked by others. 0.583<br />

49. Family members of the suicide live with shame for the rest of their lives. 0.564<br />

62. <strong>Suicide</strong> is carried out by primitive people. 0.432<br />

35. The major <strong>in</strong>tention of the suicide is to <strong>in</strong>fluence others. 0.388<br />

50. Once someone has decided to commit suicide, it is difficult to change his/her m<strong>in</strong>d. 0.385<br />

21. <strong>People</strong> who attempt or commit suicide are impulsive. 0.37<br />

44. Everyone dislikes the act of suicide. 0.366<br />

Factor 3 (Suicidal Spectrum) 4.5% of variance, alpha = 0.693<br />

32. Attempted and completed suicides share the same causes. 0.634<br />

53. Attempted and completed suicides have similar <strong>in</strong>tentions. 0.645<br />

11. Attempted and completed suicides have similar personalities. 0.624<br />

61. Attempted and completed suicides have similar <strong>in</strong>tention to die. 0.539<br />

16. Attempted and completed suicides suffer from similar levels of psychological stress. 0.522<br />

13. The suicide adapts to daily life poorly. 0.417<br />

68. Attempted and completed suicides can both achieve their goals via suicide. 0.352<br />

Factor 4 (Fatalism: Fatalism towards suicide) 4.2% of variance, alpha = 0.566<br />

33. <strong>Suicide</strong> cannot be prevented. 0.666<br />

9. The causes of suicide are beyond the control of people who commit suicide. 0.454<br />

6. <strong>Suicide</strong> happens without previous warn<strong>in</strong>g. 0.613<br />

39. Mental health promotion cannot reduce suicide.<br />

Factor 5 (Social change: Acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g the relationship between social change<br />

0.443<br />

and suicide) 3.8% of variance, alpha = 0.623<br />

59. Long-term negative events represent the major cause of suicide. 0.538<br />

34. A person commits suicide because he/she cannot solve his/her own problems. 0.502<br />

37. There has been a steep rise <strong>in</strong> suicide follow<strong>in</strong>g the Asian economic crisis. 0.487<br />

73. Negative equity is the major cause of male suicide <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. 0.486<br />

72. Terrible spousal relationships easily lead to homicide followed by suicide. 0.422<br />

60. The close connection between suicide and societal change is unalterable. 0.383<br />

31. Unexpected life events constitute the major cause of suicide. 0.362<br />

495


570 <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

TABLE 2<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Overall (36.1% of variance, alpha = 0.852) Load<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Factor 6 (Support: Support toward suicidal people) 3.3% of variance, alpha = 0.604<br />

69. Most people are will<strong>in</strong>g to offer psychological support to friends who want to attempt<br />

or commit suicide.<br />

70. Most people are will<strong>in</strong>g to offer material support to friends who want to attempt or<br />

0.579<br />

commit suicide. 0.576<br />

64. Most people care about those who had suicidal attempts. 0.558<br />

51. <strong>People</strong> can solve problems that may lead to suicide through personal effort.<br />

28. The suicide should have been able to change the psychological and personality factors<br />

0.405<br />

that led to suicide. 0.399<br />

66. Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g mental health services can reduce suicide. 0.365<br />

Factor 7 (Contagiousness: Contagiousness of suicide) 3.2% of variance, alpha = 0.511<br />

56. <strong>Suicide</strong> by celebrities leads to imitation by members of the general public. 0.605<br />

67. The media coverage of suicide news causes more people to attempt or complete suicide. 0.597<br />

71. Group suicide is becom<strong>in</strong>g more common <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>.<br />

3. <strong>Suicide</strong> leads to huge economic loss to society.0.441<br />

0.515<br />

Factor 8 (Sympathy: Sympathy towards suicide) 2.7% of variance, alpha = 0.334<br />

43. <strong>Suicide</strong> is not self-sought. 0.471<br />

22. Most people are sympathetic toward the person who had suicidal acts. 0.470<br />

63. <strong>Suicide</strong> is not under voluntary control. 0.412<br />

Factor 9 (Function: Function of suicide) 2.4% of variance, alpha = 0.308<br />

54. Sometimes a person may commit suicide for the welfare of another person.<br />

40. <strong>People</strong> with <strong>in</strong>terpersonal problems attempt or commit suicide primarily for the pur-<br />

0.460<br />

pose of mak<strong>in</strong>g threats or retaliat<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st others. 0.498<br />

26. A person has the right to euthanasia as long as he/she chooses it. 0.352<br />

Note. 16 items that did not load on any factors were not listed.<br />

*Scored <strong>in</strong> reverse direction.<br />

tudes toward suicide among different socio- tudes toward suicide to a manageable number<br />

demographic groups of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> people <strong>in</strong> of perspectives, our respondents, like subjects<br />

<strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are congruous <strong>in</strong> our focus groups, still exhibited several atwith<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> historical sources that suggest titud<strong>in</strong>al dimensions that could be <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>si-<br />

that there is no master theory that adequately cally contradictory. Thus, while four factors<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>s how <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> people perceive sui- perta<strong>in</strong>ed to social and <strong>in</strong>terpersonal aspects<br />

cide. Rather, suicide might be endorsed and/ of suicide (suicidal spectrum, social change,<br />

or condemned by particular <strong>in</strong>dividuals un- contagiousness, and sympathy), the rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />

a variety of life situations. On the one <strong>in</strong>g five (negative appraisal, stigma, fatalism,<br />

hand, suicide can be a means of avoid<strong>in</strong>g un- support, and function) were about whether<br />

bearable situations as well as a partially sanc- suicide was right or wrong, or should be met<br />

tioned strategy for deal<strong>in</strong>g with a variety of with sympathy or disapproval. These mani-<br />

social, political, economic, and moral adver- festly dissimilar perspectives attest to the<br />

sities. On the other hand, suicide was to be moral complexity of suicide and cast doubt<br />

avoided and the dead person was <strong>in</strong> some on sweep<strong>in</strong>g statements about whether Chi-<br />

texts not to be mourned for (Hsieh & Spence, nese culture is for or aga<strong>in</strong>st suicide (L<strong>in</strong>,<br />

1981; Lee & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005; L<strong>in</strong>, 1990; 1990).<br />

Wolf, 1975).<br />

Elderly suicide is one example of Chi-<br />

Although factor analysis reduces atti- nese people’s attitud<strong>in</strong>al complexity toward<br />

496


Lee et al. 571<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Variation of Factor Score (1: greatly agree—5: greatly disagree) Across Sociodemographic Characteristics<br />

Factors<br />

Negative Suicidal Fatal- Social Sup- Conta- Sym- Funcappraisal<br />

Stigma spectrum ism change port giousness pathy tion<br />

Gender<br />

Male 2.96 2.62 3.02 2.93 3.25 3.24 2.95 2.81 3.05<br />

Female 2.91 2.58 2.91 2.89 3.24 3.25 2.97 2.77 2.95<br />

t(1) 2.56* 1.93 4.33* 1.77 0.24 0.21 0.74 1.98* 4.67*<br />

Age (years)<br />

15–25 2.90 2.60 2.96 2.82 3.26 3.27 2.96 2.79 3.00<br />

26–50 2.95 2.61 2.94 2.96 3.24 3.26 2.97 2.79 3.02<br />

51–75 3.00 2.62 3.04 3.01 3.23 3.33 2.95 2.82 3.00<br />

F(2) 8.77* 0.37 4.16* 25.67* 0.88 2.55 0.22 0.72 0.41<br />

Marital Status<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle 2.91 2.60 2.96 2.86 3.26 3.25 2.97 2.79 3.01<br />

Married 2.97 2.61 2.99 2.97 3.22 3.30 2.95 2.80 3.00<br />

t(1) 3.56* 0.64 1.11 5.05* 1.92 2.27* 0.59 0.54 0.80<br />

Education<br />

Primary or below 2.99 2.66 3.01 3.03 3.19 3.31 3.02 2.81 2.98<br />

Middle School 2.97 2.62 2.99 2.96 3.22 3.26 2.93 2.84 3.02<br />

High School 2.95 2.58 2.97 2.95 3.25 3.25 2.93 2.78 3.03<br />

Tertiary or above 2.89 2.59 2.96 2.83 3.27 3.28 2.97 2.78 3.00<br />

F(3) 6.28* 2.02 0.65 17.59* 2.88* 1.20 2.25 1.34 0.77<br />

Religion<br />

Christianity 2.94 2.61 2.97 2.86 3.28 3.30 3.03 2.80 3.00<br />

Buddhism or Taois 2.99 2.61 2.98 3.01 3.23 3.31 2.99 2.84 3.02<br />

Others 2.99 2.62 3.10 2.88 3.17 3.34 2.97 2.68 3.05<br />

None 2.92 2.60 2.97 2.90 3.24 3.26 2.93 2.79 3.00<br />

F(3) 3.56* 0.11 0.32 6.09* 0.82 1.50 3.17* 1.36 0.23<br />

Employment<br />

Work<strong>in</strong>g 2.97 2.61 2.99 2.96 3.24 3.30 2.96 2.80 3.01<br />

Unemployed 2.89 2.71 2.86 2.99 3.19 3.05 3.00 2.81 3.01<br />

Students 2.89 2.59 2.87 2.81 3.26 3.27 2.97 2.79 3.00<br />

F(2) 9.01* 1.86 1.78 22.19* 0.83 9.32* 0.15 0.07 0.34<br />

Occupation<br />

Professional 2.94 2.60 3.04 2.88 3.34 3.34 3.03 2.77 3.08<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative 2.97 2.58 3.03 2.96 3.29 3.28 2.93 2.79 3.03<br />

Skilled 2.95 2.62 2.86 2.99 3.22 3.30 3.06 2.77 2.98<br />

Nonskilled 2.92 2.93 2.95 2.88 3.20 3.27 2.92 2.79 2.99<br />

F(3) 1.44 0.28 4.92* 4.20* 6.78* 1.29 5.91* 0.13 3.00*<br />

Personal monthly <strong>in</strong>come<br />

Less than US$641 2.91 2.61 2.97 2.85 3.25 3.25 2.96 2.80 3.01<br />

US$641–US$1,282 2.97 2.60 2.97 2.98 3.22 3.31 2.93 2.79 2.98<br />

US$1,283 or above 2.94 2.89 2.99 2.92 3.27 3.28 2.99 2.78 3.04<br />

F(2) 5.10* 0.41 0.21 13.98* 1.67 2.79 1.26 0.25 1.94<br />

*p < 0.05<br />

497


572 <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

TABLE 4<br />

Endorsement of <strong>Suicide</strong> Under Difficult Life Scenarios<br />

Life Scenarios Mean Score SD<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ally ill 2.61* 1.10<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g a chronic psychiatric illness 2.53* 1.12<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g severely depressed 2.50* 1.14<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g a burden to others and feel<strong>in</strong>g hopeless about the future 2.36* 1.11<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g heavily <strong>in</strong>debted because of gambl<strong>in</strong>g 2.22* 1.11<br />

Not hav<strong>in</strong>g anyone to provide f<strong>in</strong>ancial or emotional support <strong>in</strong> old age 2.22* 1.08<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g been raped 2.10 1.09<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g addicted to drugs 1.96 1.02<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g sentenced to imprisonment 1.88 0.94<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g a bus<strong>in</strong>ess failure 1.86 0.95<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g crim<strong>in</strong>ally charged 1.81 0.95<br />

Frequently abused or beaten up by spouse 1.75 0.94<br />

Note. Each of the 12 items was measured on a 5-po<strong>in</strong>t Likert scale as follows: 5 = def<strong>in</strong>itely<br />

consider, 4 = very likely to consider, 3 = probably consider, 2 = probably not consider, and 1 = def<strong>in</strong>itely not<br />

consider.<br />

*refers to mean score significantly higher than 2 (probably not consider) (p < 0.05)<br />

suicide. Filial piety <strong>in</strong> the Confucian tradi- more sympathetic toward suicidal people<br />

tion has often been cited as a <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> virtue when compared to male respondents. They<br />

that protects the elderly from adversities, yet were also more likely to make a dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

the rates of suicide among the elderly are between suicide and attempted suicide. This<br />

consistently very high among <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> com- comb<strong>in</strong>ation of attitudes appears to protect<br />

munities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Taiwan, and them aga<strong>in</strong>st suicide but, <strong>in</strong> the presence of<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gapore (Lee & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005). Such a impulsivity, may also make them more likely<br />

paradox <strong>in</strong>dicates the need to take a multi- to attempt suicide under circumstances of<br />

attitud<strong>in</strong>al approach to understand<strong>in</strong>g the el- perceived hopelessness (Goldsmith, Pellmar,<br />

derly vulnerability to suicide. The present Kle<strong>in</strong>man, & Bunney, 2002). Conversely, by<br />

study provides at least two clues to this vul- mak<strong>in</strong>g a smaller dist<strong>in</strong>ction between suicide<br />

nerability. First, term<strong>in</strong>al and chronic dis- and attempted suicide and demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g less<br />

eases were the most commonly endorsed ra- sympathy toward suicidal people, male retionales<br />

for suicide out of the twelve difficult spondents might be less likely to expect res-<br />

scenarios presented to our respondents (Ta- cue or seek help, and more likely to make a<br />

ble 4). Second, older respondents were more lethal attempt. This may help expla<strong>in</strong> the<br />

fatalistic toward suicide and more likely to higher ratio of suicide/attempted suicide<br />

consider suicide under the hypothesized sce- among male than female <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> both<br />

narios. This <strong>in</strong>dicates a cl<strong>in</strong>ical need for help- <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> and Western communities (Lee &<br />

<strong>in</strong>g professionals to be especially sensitive to Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005). The cl<strong>in</strong>ical implication of<br />

the vulnerability to suicide of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> elderly this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g may be that proactive approaches<br />

with chronic diseases.<br />

are required for help<strong>in</strong>g suicidal males. Pop-<br />

Attitud<strong>in</strong>al variability may stem from ular measures such as hotl<strong>in</strong>e counsel<strong>in</strong>g may<br />

the fact that a given person holds a contradic- not be effective.<br />

tory mixture of attitudes that <strong>in</strong>teract among<br />

themselves under particular scenarios. In the<br />

Cross-Cultural Comparison<br />

present study, female respondents exhibited a Different methodologies employed premore<br />

negative appraisal of suicide and were clude a valid comparison between the f<strong>in</strong>d-<br />

498


Lee et al. 573<br />

<strong>in</strong>gs of our study and those reported <strong>in</strong> the ceived limited public and policy attention <strong>in</strong><br />

West. Nonetheless, it is <strong>in</strong>structive to draw <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. This echoed our focus group<br />

comparisons on certa<strong>in</strong> items of general <strong>in</strong>- f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, which showed that the professional<br />

terest. Thus, we compared five items of the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of suicide be<strong>in</strong>g due to treatable<br />

CASQ-HK about the myths and prevention mental disorders such as depression or hav-<br />

of suicide with comparable items drawn from <strong>in</strong>g biological causes was conspicuous by its<br />

a Norwegian survey (Table 5; Hjelmeland & absence (except <strong>in</strong> the group consist<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

Knizek, 2004). The results suggest that both healthcare professionals). It was also shown<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> and Norwegian respondents were by the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that only 23.9% of responneutral<br />

about the statement “<strong>People</strong> who talk dents endorsed the item “<strong>People</strong> who at-<br />

about suicide do not commit suicide,” but tempted or committed suicide very often had<br />

Norwegians showed a stronger agreement to mental illnesses.” How this difference may<br />

“There is a risk to evoke suicidal thoughts relate to lower rates of suicide <strong>in</strong> Norway<br />

<strong>in</strong> a person’s m<strong>in</strong>d if you ask about it.” Our (11.1/100,000 <strong>in</strong> 2003) than <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

respondents also demonstrated more agree- (18.6/100,000 <strong>in</strong> 2003) is worth exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

ment to “<strong>Suicide</strong> happens without previous the future (Census and Statistics Department<br />

warn<strong>in</strong>g” and less agreement with “<strong>Suicide</strong> of HKSAR, 2004; Judiciary of HKSAR, 2004;<br />

can be prevented.” Both <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> and Nor- Statistics Norway, 2004).<br />

wegian respondents somewhat disagreed with A study <strong>in</strong> Sweden exam<strong>in</strong>ed public at-<br />

“Once someone has decided to commit suititudes toward suicide <strong>in</strong> 1986 and 1996 <strong>in</strong><br />

cide, it is difficult to change his/her m<strong>in</strong>d.” the context of a multifactor model (Renberg<br />

Overall speak<strong>in</strong>g, our respondents exhibited & Jacobsson, 2003). This suggested that at an<br />

a more pessimistic attitude than Norwegians <strong>in</strong>dividual level, a permissive attitude toward<br />

toward the prevention of suicide. This is not suicide was associated with affirmative re-<br />

surpris<strong>in</strong>g because suicide prevention has re- sponses to questions about one’s own suicidal<br />

TABLE 5<br />

Comparison of Response Distribution About the Myths and Prevention of <strong>Suicide</strong> with the Study<br />

by Hjelmeland and Knizek (2004)<br />

Strongly In doubt/ Strongly<br />

agree Agree Middle Disagree Disagree<br />

Nw Hk Nw Hk Nw Hk Nw Hk Nw Hk<br />

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)<br />

<strong>People</strong> who talk about suicide do not<br />

commit suicide<br />

There is a risk to evoke suicidal<br />

thoughts <strong>in</strong> a person’s m<strong>in</strong>d if one<br />

1.9 3.2 27.4 33.6 52.9 34.3 12.8 26.5 5.1 2.4<br />

asks about it.<br />

<strong>Suicide</strong> happens without previous<br />

1.9 1.5 7.4 7.8 44.1 19.6 34.3 55.3 12.3 15.5<br />

warn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Once a person has made up his/her<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d about suicide, nobody can<br />

3.9 4.9 25.3 30.4 32.7 14.7 32.3 41.2 5.8 7.7<br />

stop him/her. 3.9 1.7 15.0 15.3 29.3 21.3 38.1 52.1 13.6 8.4<br />

<strong>Suicide</strong> can be prevented 36.7 5.3 45.8 32.1 16.3 16.8 0.7 38.8 0.5 6.4<br />

Hk (<strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>): f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from this study<br />

Nw (Norway): f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs shown <strong>in</strong> the study by Hjelmeland and Knizek (2004)<br />

499


574 <strong>Attitudes</strong> <strong>Toward</strong> <strong>Suicide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

behavior. This tallied with our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that tud<strong>in</strong>al complexity of suicide may navigate<br />

respondents who were classified under hypo- different forms of prevention efforts to more<br />

thetical scenarios as be<strong>in</strong>g high risk had more<br />

suicidal ideation, made previous suicide at-<br />

realistic goals.<br />

tempts, and demonstrated a more positive<br />

appraisal of suicide than their respective<br />

Limitations and Future Research<br />

comparison groups. The present study has several limitations<br />

that suggest the need for further re-<br />

Implications for <strong>Suicide</strong> Prevention search. First, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from a convenience<br />

sample clearly cannot be generalized to the<br />

Phillips, Liu, and Zhang (1999) sug- general population <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> or other<br />

gested five <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g factors that collec- <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> communities. The low variance extively<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed suicide rates <strong>in</strong> a commupla<strong>in</strong>ed by the identified factors could, for exnity.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>cluded cultural attitudes toward ample, be due to sampl<strong>in</strong>g bias toward pro-<br />

suicide <strong>in</strong> addition to the prevalence of social ductive members of society (namely, employees<br />

and mental health problems, convenience of and students). Future studies should encommethods<br />

of suicide, and comprehensiveness pass a general population sample that <strong>in</strong>-<br />

of suicide prevention services. While <strong>in</strong>tu- cludes socially disadvantaged people who<br />

itively plausible, these five factors are not eas- may be more prone to endorse suicide. Secily<br />

modifiable, especially by cl<strong>in</strong>icians. In the ond, attitudes do not necessarily translate<br />

case of <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>, there is little popula- <strong>in</strong>to behavior <strong>in</strong> accordance with the multition-based<br />

public health policy that addresses factor model of suicide (Manstead, 1996). At-<br />

the treatment gap of mental disorders, not to titudes must <strong>in</strong>teract among themselves and<br />

speak of their prevention. Widely believed to with non-attitud<strong>in</strong>al factors <strong>in</strong> their ultimate<br />

be gatekeepers, primary care practitioners are impact on behavior. As such, our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequately tra<strong>in</strong>ed to manage common should be <strong>in</strong>terpreted cautiously. Third, the<br />

mental disorders (Lee, Tsang, & Kwok, CASQ-HK was lengthy and, because of our<br />

2007). The most common methods of suicide failure to secure consent from the partici-<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>—jump<strong>in</strong>g from height and pants for a second round of distribution, its<br />

charcoal burn<strong>in</strong>g (Centre for <strong>Suicide</strong> test-retest reliability was not established.<br />

Research and Prevention, 2005)—are hardly Shorten<strong>in</strong>g it will allow larger samples of<br />

controllable. Moreover, suicide prevention people to be exam<strong>in</strong>ed and a more str<strong>in</strong>gent<br />

efforts are not only limited <strong>in</strong> quantity but assessment of its psychometric properties. Fi-<br />

also have adopted methods (e.g., hotl<strong>in</strong>e nally, we believe that attitud<strong>in</strong>al surveys fail<br />

counsel<strong>in</strong>g by volunteers and advice to jour- to uncover the layers of privacy and equivonalists<br />

on appropriate ways of report<strong>in</strong>g sui- cality that typically envelop suicide. They<br />

cide) that are of questionable usefulness. In should be complemented by ethnographic<br />

regards to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the present study, research that elucidates the complex <strong>in</strong>terac-<br />

we are still uncerta<strong>in</strong> about how attitudes and tions of attitudes and behaviors <strong>in</strong> specific<br />

contextual factors act <strong>in</strong> concert to evoke sui- contexts and how large-scale socioeconomic<br />

cide, and how attitud<strong>in</strong>al data can be <strong>in</strong>te- transformations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society shape the<br />

grated <strong>in</strong>to health <strong>in</strong>terventions to reduce <strong>in</strong>ter-subjective mean<strong>in</strong>gs of suicide (Lee &<br />

suicide. Nonetheless, acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g the atti- Kle<strong>in</strong>man, 2005).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Census and Statistics Department of<br />

HKSAR. (2004). Women and men <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>—<br />

vention. (2005). Research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to suicide and<br />

its prevention. <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>: University of <strong>Hong</strong><br />

Key statistics. <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>: Author. <strong>Kong</strong>.<br />

Centre for <strong>Suicide</strong> Research and Pre-<br />

Goldsmith, S. K., Pellmar, T. C., Kle<strong>in</strong>-<br />

500


Lee et al. 575<br />

man, A. M., & Bunney, W. E. (2002). Reduc<strong>in</strong>g behaviour. In G. R. Sem<strong>in</strong> & K. Fieldler (Eds.),<br />

suicide—A national imperative. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: Applied social psychology (pp. 3–29). London: Sage.<br />

National Academies Press. Phillips, M. R., Liu, H. Q., & Zhang,<br />

Hjelmeland, H., & Knizek, B. L. (2004). Y. P. (1999). <strong>Suicide</strong> and social change <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

The general public’s views on suicide and suicide Culture, Medic<strong>in</strong>e & Psychiatry, 23, 25–50.<br />

prevention, and their perception of participat<strong>in</strong>g Phillips, M. R., Li, X. Y., & Zhang,Y. P.<br />

<strong>in</strong> a study on attitudes towards suicide. Archives of (2002). <strong>Suicide</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 1995–1999. Lancet,<br />

<strong>Suicide</strong> Research, 38, 345–359.<br />

359, 835–847.<br />

Hsieh, A. C., & Spence, J. D. (1981). Sui- Phillips, M. R. (2004, July). Community atcide<br />

and the family <strong>in</strong> pre-modern <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> socititudes about suicide <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>land Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Paper preety.<br />

In A. Kle<strong>in</strong>man & T. L<strong>in</strong> (Eds.), Normal and sented at the workshop of ICHORTA, Beij<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

abnormal behavior <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> culture (pp. 29–47). Renberg, E. S., & Jacobsson, L. (2003).<br />

Boston: D. Reidel. Development of a questionnaire on attitudes to-<br />

Judiciary of the HKSAR. (2004). Corowards suicide (ATTS) and its application <strong>in</strong> a<br />

ner’s Report 2003. Retrieved November 8, 2005, Swedish population. <strong>Suicide</strong> and Life-Threaten<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from http://www.judiciary.gov.hk/en/publications/ Behavior, 33, 52–64.<br />

publications.htm#con_report Shen, Y. C., Zhang, M. Y., Huang, Y. Q.,<br />

Lee, S., & Kle<strong>in</strong>man, A. (2005). <strong>Suicide</strong> as He, Y. L., Liu, Z. R., Cheng, H., et al. (2006).<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society. In E. J. Perry & M. Twelve month prevalence, severity and unmet<br />

Selden (Eds.), <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society: Change, conflict and re- need for treatment of mental disorders <strong>in</strong> metrosistance<br />

(2nd ed.; pp. 289–311). London: Routledge. politan Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Psychological Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 36, 1–11.<br />

Lee, S., Tsang, A., & Kwok, K. (2007). Statistics Norway. (2004). Statistical<br />

Twelve-month prevalence, correlates, and treat- yearbook of Norway. Retrieved November, 8, 2005,<br />

ment preference of adults with DSM-IV major from http://www.ssb.no/english/<br />

depressive episode <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong>. Journal of Affec- Wolf, M. (1975). Women and suicide <strong>in</strong><br />

tive Disorders, 98, 129–136.<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In M. Wolf & R. Witke (Eds.), Women <strong>in</strong><br />

L<strong>in</strong>, Y. H. (1990). The weight of mount Tai: <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> society, (pp. 111–141). Stanford: Stanford<br />

Patterns of suicide <strong>in</strong> traditional <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese</strong> history and<br />

culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni-<br />

University Press.<br />

versity of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, Madison. Manuscript Received: January 28, 2006<br />

Manstead, A.S.R. (1996). <strong>Attitudes</strong> and<br />

Revision Accepted: November 1, 2006<br />

501

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!