10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

accurately account for <strong>the</strong> internal developments on <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>: “It seems quite certain<br />

that <strong>the</strong> great change that <strong>the</strong>n affected <strong>the</strong> industry [between <strong>the</strong> EC-MC <strong>and</strong> LC<br />

periods] was not <strong>the</strong> result of an internal technical revolution, but was due to <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> of foreign metal-workers, <strong>the</strong>ir techniques <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir products.” 147<br />

Catling’s<br />

claim is not supported by <strong>the</strong> current evidence, which shows that <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>’s craft<br />

industries, for <strong>the</strong> most part, seem to have acted upon indigenous preferences <strong>and</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s for tools. Judging by <strong>the</strong> broad regional <strong>and</strong> temporal tool tendencies, Cyprus<br />

displays a unique dataset, reflecting very different social, economic, <strong>and</strong> political factors<br />

in comparison to o<strong>the</strong>r areas (Figs. 3.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.3).<br />

Classification of <strong>the</strong> entire corpus of tools into functional categories is shown in<br />

Figure 3.4, <strong>and</strong> an analysis of <strong>the</strong> regional, chronological <strong>and</strong> contextual patterns of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

groupings constitute <strong>the</strong> majority of this chapter. Carpentry <strong>and</strong> masonry tools are <strong>the</strong><br />

most ubiquitous objects, followed, in quantity, by utilitarian objects, small craft tools,<br />

agricultural tools, metallurgical implements (including stone molds), <strong>and</strong> ritual or<br />

prestige items. The division of <strong>the</strong> dataset into functional categories indicates <strong>the</strong><br />

preference for tool types as well as <strong>the</strong> choices that were made in utilizing copper.<br />

Agricultural <strong>and</strong> metallurgical tools are found in relatively low quantities. Many<br />

implements for farming <strong>and</strong> metalworking are large, meaning that greater amounts of raw<br />

metal was required to produce <strong>the</strong>m; <strong>the</strong>refore it seems probable that <strong>the</strong>ir production <strong>and</strong><br />

use was confined to elite installations, which could afford <strong>the</strong>m. Manufacturing smaller<br />

tools, such as those intended for minor craft <strong>and</strong> utilitarian needs, did not require as much<br />

material. The comparatively low number of metal agricultural tools suggests that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were valuable with restricted distributions, most often found at large palatial or urban<br />

147 Catling 1964, 78.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!