10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

durability. Stone cutting objects became dull quickly <strong>and</strong> had to be retouched <strong>and</strong><br />

sharpened more often. 121 Obsidian blades were extremely sharp <strong>and</strong> may have served<br />

everyday cutting needs (for instance, processing fish), 122 but it is also possible that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were used for crafting. Obsidian, in addition to o<strong>the</strong>r qualities, is effective in cutting<br />

wood. 123<br />

Obsidian blades also offered alternatives to metal knives <strong>and</strong> sickles.<br />

The outdated <strong>and</strong> simplistic notion that metal implements completely replaced<br />

124<br />

lithic types is no longer tenable. Evely recognized as much by pointing out <strong>the</strong> diverse<br />

repertoire of stone tools in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bronze</strong> <strong>Age</strong>: “<strong>the</strong> range, variety <strong>and</strong> degree of<br />

specialization of stone tools appear to increase even as <strong>the</strong> development of metal tools<br />

was gaining momentum.” 125<br />

It is well recognized that stone tools were contemporary<br />

with metal versions at major LBA urban centers (e.g. Tiryns, <strong>the</strong> Palace of Nestor,<br />

Enkomi, <strong>and</strong> Hattusha) but it is less certain how those lithics complemented or<br />

augmented bronze tools in craft work. Perhaps stone versions served as backups for <strong>the</strong><br />

metal forms. It is possible that an artisan’s tool kit consisted of both metal <strong>and</strong> stone<br />

implements, each intended for a specific purpose. Evely explains <strong>the</strong> simultaneous<br />

preference for stone <strong>and</strong> metal tools in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bronze</strong> <strong>Age</strong>, but notes that certain stone<br />

implements—those with cutting edges—declined with <strong>the</strong> production of metal ones:<br />

The continuing popularity of <strong>the</strong>se [stone] objects is presumably to be accounted for by<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir relative cheapness, wide naturally-occurring availability <strong>and</strong>, no doubt, an<br />

effectiveness not greatly inferior to any metal counterpart. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> major advantage<br />

of metal over stone (excepting flint, chert <strong>and</strong> obsidian) is <strong>the</strong> keenness <strong>and</strong> durability of<br />

<strong>the</strong> edge that can be put on <strong>the</strong> former: it can be no coincidence that <strong>the</strong> commonest metal<br />

121<br />

For ethnographic data about <strong>the</strong> use of stone tools to cut elephant hide, see Frison 1989, 777-778.<br />

122<br />

Experimental archaeology has demonstrated <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of obsidian blades in cutting <strong>and</strong> scaling<br />

fish. Moreover, use-wear patterns on obsidian flakes <strong>from</strong> Franchthi Cave <strong>and</strong> Uzzo Cave (Trapani, Sicily)<br />

suggest that <strong>the</strong> stone tools were used to butcher fish. See, Iovino 2002, 203, 206.<br />

123<br />

For a discussion of Minoan obsidian tools, see Evely 1993, 119-141.<br />

124<br />

This is clear <strong>from</strong> survey data of flaked stones <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Argolid: Kardulias <strong>and</strong> Runnels 1995,<br />

108-109, Table 5.20.<br />

125<br />

Evely 1993, 116.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!