10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Different tool names may imply dissimilar connotations, even for implements<br />

whose appearances are comparable. Chisels, adzes, <strong>and</strong> axes are morphologically similar,<br />

yet <strong>the</strong> exact appellation given to each object may differ by region. The terminology<br />

affiliated with <strong>the</strong> variations of each object type is particularly troublesome. For instance,<br />

publications employ both “lugged” <strong>and</strong> “trunnion” to describe some axes or adzes. 60<br />

“Single” <strong>and</strong> “flat” are o<strong>the</strong>r terms that scholars have used interchangeably to describe<br />

basic axes <strong>and</strong> adzes. 61 Broad chisels that have cutting edges at least three centimeters in<br />

width are comparable to flat/single axes <strong>and</strong> adzes. Broad chisels <strong>and</strong> single-edged axes<br />

are similar objects whose identification differs by regional <strong>and</strong> temporal parameters. The<br />

problem of identifying smallish axes <strong>from</strong> chisels is also challenging, as recognized by<br />

Tripathi. 62 In an overview of Neolithic <strong>and</strong> EBA metallurgy, McGeehan-Liritzis devised<br />

a simple technique, based upon size, for distinguishing between chisels <strong>and</strong> axes. 63<br />

Since<br />

chisels wield more precision than axes, which make deep cuts with chopping motions,<br />

differences in cutting widths <strong>and</strong> overall lengths should be clear. Chisels typically have a<br />

narrower cutting edge to concentrate pressure in a confined area for detail work, unlike<br />

<strong>the</strong> basic cutting needs serviced by a wider ax blade. McGeehan-Liritzis suggests a tool’s<br />

length divided by its maximum width forms a ratio that can distinguish axes <strong>from</strong> chisels.<br />

Ax ratios <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Late</strong> Neolithic <strong>and</strong> Early <strong>Bronze</strong> <strong>Aegean</strong> fall below 4.4, while chisel<br />

ratios hover well above. This formula serves as a valuable guide, <strong>and</strong> this length-over-<br />

60 Lugged adzes/axes: Bass 1967, 97ff; Pulak 1988a, 15. Trunnion axes: Catling 1964, 87-88; Evely<br />

1993, 58-61; Iakovidis (1982, 224) uses <strong>the</strong> term “lugged or trunnion axe.”<br />

61 Flat axe/adzes: Catling 1964, 85-87;Bass 1967, 95ff (uses “plain adzes”); Branigan 1974,24, 166;<br />

Åström 1977-78, 12-18; Balthazar 1990, 360ff; Evely 1993, 72-76; Shaw 1973a, 47ff.<br />

Single axes: Branigan 1974, 165ff; Evely 1993, 55-58; Iakovidis 1982, 224 (calls <strong>the</strong>m “one-edged axes”).<br />

62 Tripathi 1988, 41, 46.<br />

63 McGeehan-Liritzis 1996, 58-59; Kramer-Hajos <strong>and</strong> O'Neill 2008, 194-195.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!