10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graves portray warrior images more so than that of craftspersons, <strong>the</strong> early Mycenaeans<br />

apparently were not interested in memorializing craft activities in <strong>the</strong> mortuary realm.<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> nature of craftspersons <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relationship to <strong>the</strong> elites at early Mycenae is<br />

very inconclusive. O<strong>the</strong>r Minoan or Cretan-inspired implements are found on MBA<br />

Lefkas (elongated chisel), LH IIB Vaphio (ax-adze with figure-of-eight shield motif), LH<br />

II-IIIA1 Andronianoi (saw) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> general area of Patras (double ax). In terms of <strong>the</strong><br />

overall carpentry/masonry tool types, <strong>the</strong>re is not explicit evidence for regular interaction<br />

between Minoan <strong>and</strong> Mycenaean craftspersons. Although <strong>the</strong> double ax became<br />

prominent in <strong>the</strong> LH III period on <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong>, it exhibits important changes <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

earlier Minoan version. Despite <strong>the</strong>se conclusions, craft interactions between Cretans <strong>and</strong><br />

Mainl<strong>and</strong>ers must have taken place. Recent analysis of <strong>the</strong> Palace of Nestor at Pylos<br />

concluded that <strong>the</strong> building’s original form contained certain Cretan architectural<br />

traits. 780 A Minoan craft presence in Messenia thus remains a distinct possibility, despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> absence of Minoan carpentry/masonry implements at Pylos, <strong>and</strong> has long been<br />

suspected due to <strong>the</strong> mason’s marks on <strong>the</strong> LH IIA Peristeria tholos. 781<br />

Double axes are peculiar to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aegean</strong> <strong>and</strong> chiefly found on Crete <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greek<br />

mainl<strong>and</strong>. Pieces have sporadically turned up in o<strong>the</strong>r areas, but <strong>the</strong> sheer quantity of<br />

double axes <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aegean</strong> is unmatched. Minoan <strong>and</strong> Mycenaean double ax forms are<br />

easily distinguishable in <strong>the</strong>ir form <strong>and</strong> date. The Mycenaean double ax was developed<br />

only by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Late</strong> Helladic III period, meaning that <strong>the</strong> tool is absent <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong><br />

during <strong>the</strong> early Mycenaean period, even though <strong>the</strong> tool had reached its zenith of<br />

popularity on Crete at that time. The mainl<strong>and</strong> versions had an oval shaft hole with<br />

780 Nelson 2001, 190.<br />

781 Wright 1978, 147; Palyvou 2005, 181.<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!