10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

metal) within <strong>the</strong> Foundry hoard, <strong>the</strong> intact <strong>and</strong> broken carpentry/masonry tools were not<br />

materials to be recycled.<br />

The Enkomi Gunnis hoard is formed entirely by metallurgical, agricultural <strong>and</strong><br />

carpentry/masonry implements. One-third of <strong>the</strong> assemblage is represented by <strong>the</strong> last<br />

category, specifically four double-adzes, one ax-adze <strong>and</strong> one flat ax. 679<br />

These six<br />

implements bear distinct traces of usage <strong>and</strong> damage, yet <strong>the</strong>y are all complete (e.g.<br />

Plates 5.25-7). As <strong>the</strong>re is no prototype for a st<strong>and</strong>ardized Cypriot carpentry/masonry tool<br />

kit, <strong>the</strong> collection in <strong>the</strong> Gunnis hoard may very well represent an example of one.<br />

The wood- <strong>and</strong> stone-working tools <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Enkomi Trésor de <strong>Bronze</strong>s<br />

encompass just under one-third of <strong>the</strong> hoard. The careful selection of implements makes<br />

this example one of <strong>the</strong> strongest for arguing that hoard components were chosen <strong>and</strong><br />

arranged with a structural principle in mind. The carpentry/masonry tools <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> hoard<br />

are one double adze, one hammer-adze, one ax-adze, three drills, one flat adze, one broad<br />

(cold?) chisel/wedge, <strong>and</strong> one narrow (mortise) chisel (Plate 5.32).<br />

680<br />

These tools are all<br />

whole, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> hoard yielded only one fragmentary implement: a knife broken at its mid-<br />

section. There are signs of use on several objects, <strong>and</strong> it is conceivable that <strong>the</strong> hammer-<br />

adze was modified <strong>from</strong> an ax-adze. The hammer-adze in fact bears resemblance to <strong>the</strong><br />

intact ax-adze <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> same hoard (Plates 5.32; 4.39). On <strong>the</strong> manipulated tool, <strong>the</strong> side<br />

that was formerly an ax end was truncated to create a hammer head, which is slightly<br />

jagged after being severed. The deliberate arrangement of <strong>the</strong> set is evident <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that numerous tool types are represented with a single copy (similar to <strong>the</strong> Orchomenos<br />

679 The ax-adze has a crack on one side wall, but it is uncertain whe<strong>the</strong>r this damage resulted <strong>from</strong> postexcavation<br />

activity or <strong>the</strong> tool was damaged when deposited in <strong>the</strong> hoard. The published photographs <strong>and</strong><br />

drawings fail to indicate this crack.<br />

680 The broad chisel/wedge, two drills <strong>and</strong> knife are not picture in my photograph. For <strong>the</strong> publication<br />

drawings of <strong>the</strong>se tools, see Schaeffer 1952, 40 -2, figure 1 <strong>and</strong> 3.<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!