10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were consciously formed <strong>and</strong> likely reused; this observation is detectable in o<strong>the</strong>r hoards<br />

as well. The value of stockpiled tools, regardless of <strong>the</strong>ir preservation, is thus<br />

underappreciated. The functional worth of all hoarded implements demonstrates, in part,<br />

<strong>the</strong> multi-dimensional makeup <strong>and</strong> intricacy of metal assemblages.<br />

Two foundry hoards <strong>from</strong> Mycenae warrant discussion here. The Mycenae Poros<br />

Wall collection is envisioned as a foundry hoard because of its numerous oxhide ingot<br />

fragments <strong>and</strong> several misshaped objects (three knives, a sword, not shown, <strong>and</strong> a broad<br />

chisel—all bent to some degree; Plate 5.17). 635 The whole implements (two chisels, one<br />

drill, a small hammer <strong>and</strong> a double ax) were undeniably functional, despite <strong>the</strong>ir physical<br />

association with <strong>the</strong> scrap-like material. Interpretations of <strong>the</strong> hoard thus must account for<br />

<strong>the</strong> coexistence of well-preserved <strong>and</strong> damaged objects. Categorizing <strong>the</strong> Mycenae<br />

Tsountas hoard as belonging to a foundry is also dubious, at least with regard to its series<br />

of implements showing minor signs of wear (Plate 5.18). 636<br />

Of nine double axes, only<br />

one is cracked along its shaft-hole sidewall. The o<strong>the</strong>rs are whole but not pristine, having<br />

been utilized prior to <strong>the</strong>ir deposition. The collection of broad chisels <strong>from</strong> this hoard<br />

consisted of a few broken pieces <strong>and</strong> whole implements, many of which were worn down<br />

<strong>from</strong> use. Some of <strong>the</strong>se broad chisels display annealing marks on <strong>the</strong>ir tips, indicating<br />

that <strong>the</strong> blade edges were repaired or reformed at one time (Plate 5.18).<br />

Most implements <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> A<strong>the</strong>ns Acropolis hoard are whole, but a few examples<br />

have notable damage (Plate 5.19).<br />

637<br />

Two halves of a double ax, each <strong>from</strong> a different<br />

object, denote intentional manipulation, as <strong>the</strong> remnant shaft-hole walls are slightly bent<br />

635<br />

Poros wall hoard references: Wace 1953, Stubbings 1954, Catling 1964, 295-296; Spyropoulos 1972,<br />

46-51.<br />

636<br />

Tsountas hoard references: Catling 1964, 294-295; Spyropoulos 1972, 8-45.<br />

637<br />

A<strong>the</strong>ns Acropolis hoard references: Catling 1964, 296; Spyropoulos 1972, 63-78.<br />

274

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!