10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A complete double ax <strong>and</strong> four halves of double axes come <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Orchomenos<br />

cache. Each fragment was intentionally altered as such, yet no half has a corresponding<br />

match, meaning that each piece came <strong>from</strong> a different ax. One double ax half (MX 502)<br />

retained a damaged blade edge still capable of making simple cuts (Plate 5.3). Severed at<br />

its shaft-hole area, <strong>the</strong> object’s two sidewalls are slightly bent in one direction. This<br />

distortion did not result <strong>from</strong> typical usage. The original double ax may have incurred<br />

damage to its shaft hole through use, but <strong>the</strong> object must have been cut in two<br />

intentionally. This process involved cracking <strong>the</strong> tool at <strong>the</strong> shaft-hole area, <strong>the</strong>n bending<br />

<strong>the</strong> opposite blade ends of <strong>the</strong> double ax back toward each o<strong>the</strong>r, probably aided by<br />

pounding with a hammer. Distorting <strong>the</strong> object in this way facilitated <strong>the</strong> severing<br />

process, which was ultimately accomplished with a cutting implement like a chisel.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r double ax fragment, also cut at <strong>the</strong> shaft hole (MX 503, Plate 5.4),<br />

reveals unmistakable proof of deliberate manipulation. Roughly one-third of a shaft-hole<br />

sidewall remains <strong>and</strong> is turned outward. On <strong>the</strong> opposite side, a short stub is <strong>the</strong> remnant<br />

of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sidewall. Along <strong>the</strong> broken edge of this stub, <strong>the</strong>re is a small, yet distinct,<br />

rectangular groove, perhaps a cut mark <strong>from</strong> a narrow chisel. A second gap along <strong>the</strong><br />

break seems to indicate ano<strong>the</strong>r cut, fur<strong>the</strong>r confirming that this piece’s present shape was<br />

intentionally made. Despite its fragmentary nature after being bent <strong>and</strong> cut, this double ax<br />

piece preserved a serviceable cutting edge, meaning that <strong>the</strong> tool possibly retained a<br />

functional purpose, perhaps that of a wedge.<br />

A third fragmentary double ax (MX 509, Plate 5.5) was also broken on purpose.<br />

One sidewall of <strong>the</strong> shaft-hole faces outward; this deformation is <strong>the</strong> result of bending <strong>the</strong><br />

opposite tool ends toge<strong>the</strong>r, probably by using a hammer. A fourth double ax half (MX<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!