10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

axes, <strong>and</strong> drills. Awls/engravers <strong>and</strong> shaft-hole axes are insignificant tools <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Cluster 3 hoards.<br />

The final notable hoard group is Cluster 4. Ten caches form this cluster: five <strong>from</strong><br />

Cyprus, four <strong>from</strong> Crete, <strong>and</strong> one assemblage <strong>from</strong> Ugarit. This cluster differs <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

earlier Cypriot grouping (Cluster 1) by a greater presence of carpentry/masonry<br />

implements <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> infrequency of agricultural tools. As was done for Cluster 3, <strong>the</strong><br />

hoard information <strong>from</strong> Cluster 4 was also grouped by variables. The Jaccard’s<br />

Coefficient similarity for <strong>the</strong> tool types of <strong>the</strong> Cluster 4 hoards are listed in a proximity<br />

matrix in Figure 5.10. A dendrogram visually conveys <strong>the</strong> similarities of <strong>the</strong>se tool types<br />

through average linkage cluster analysis (Fig. 5.12). The implement similarities <strong>from</strong><br />

Cluster 4 are not as tight as <strong>the</strong> patterns in Cluster 3, yet <strong>the</strong>re are some distinctive tool<br />

links. Narrow chisels show a close relationship to single/flat axes, while both tools<br />

display a looser connection to shaft-hole axes. Drills <strong>and</strong> knives/razors have a correlation<br />

within Cluster 4, as do combination tools <strong>and</strong> smith tools. All four of <strong>the</strong>se implements<br />

are linked by a secondary grouping, which is loosely tied to saws. The exact significance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Cluster 4 tools is difficult to gauge, as <strong>the</strong> hoards are well distributed over time in<br />

<strong>the</strong> second millennium. The earliest is <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> MM I-II period <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> latest dates to <strong>the</strong><br />

late 13 th or early 12 th century, but <strong>the</strong>re are few MBA-LBA transitional hoards in this<br />

cluster as well. Therefore, it is difficult statistically to recognize tool kits within <strong>the</strong>se<br />

hoards. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most significant observation is that <strong>the</strong>re is no relation between<br />

double axes <strong>and</strong> broad chisels in Cluster 4, thus contrasting <strong>the</strong> pattern in Cluster 3.<br />

Evidently, <strong>the</strong> pairing of double axes <strong>and</strong> broad chisels was atypical in Cypriot <strong>and</strong> early<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!