10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The similarity of <strong>the</strong> Tiryns hoard with Cluster 1 <strong>and</strong> not with <strong>the</strong> Greek mainl<strong>and</strong><br />

grouping is noteworthy. This pattern is explained by <strong>the</strong> general lack of tools in <strong>the</strong><br />

Tiryns cache <strong>and</strong> perhaps it should be considered an outlier. Yet one cannot help but<br />

recognize that <strong>the</strong> Tiryns hoard, dated to <strong>the</strong> LH IIIC period, was very different <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r mainl<strong>and</strong> hoards, most of which date to LH IIIB/C. 624 The statistical inclusion of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Tiryns hoard with a collection of Cypriot hoards may be significant, however, for<br />

several objects within <strong>the</strong> hoard display Cypriot characteristics, including a bronze tripod<br />

st<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> three gold pendants shaped as bull’s heads. 625<br />

As iron was more common<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 12 th century on Cyprus than <strong>the</strong> Greek mainl<strong>and</strong>, an iron sickle in <strong>the</strong> Tiryns<br />

assemblage perhaps is indicative of a Cypriot tool. A Tiryns‒Cypriot link is documented<br />

by o<strong>the</strong>r objects including <strong>the</strong> Cypriot wall-brackets at <strong>the</strong> post-palatial center.<br />

Cluster 2 comprises only six hoards, <strong>and</strong> four of <strong>the</strong>se can be dated to <strong>the</strong> 13 th or<br />

12 th centuries while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two are also <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> LBA. Two hoards come <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mainl<strong>and</strong> (Katamachi <strong>and</strong> Stephani, both <strong>from</strong> Epirus), <strong>and</strong> four are <strong>from</strong> Cyprus (Kition,<br />

Pyla, Athienou, <strong>and</strong> Enkomi miniature). These assemblages are related by <strong>the</strong> presence of<br />

smith objects, in addition to a limited number of o<strong>the</strong>r tool variables. Three of <strong>the</strong> six<br />

hoards have narrow chisels, two have doubles axes, <strong>and</strong> two have drills. Because of <strong>the</strong><br />

small cluster <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> low number of variables in <strong>the</strong>se hoards, Cluster 2 does not seem as<br />

significant as Clusters 1, 3 <strong>and</strong> 4.<br />

Cluster 3 contains 23 hoards principally <strong>from</strong> Crete <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong>, though two<br />

are <strong>from</strong> Cyprus (#32 <strong>and</strong> 37). Several sub-clusters form this much larger grouping <strong>and</strong><br />

two of those sub-clusters appear to be meaningful. The first sub-cluster consists of three<br />

624 This point is emphasized by Maran 2006, 130.<br />

625 Maran 2006, 134-137.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!