10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

composition is necessary because <strong>the</strong> importance of tools <strong>and</strong> craft kits within <strong>the</strong> caches<br />

has not been appreciated. 573<br />

Personal collections, merchants’ goods, smiths’ materials, or ritual/ceremonial<br />

paraphernalia are all potential unifying <strong>the</strong>mes for a hoard. Two broad classifications<br />

regarding purpose have developed in scholarship: utilitarian (non-ceremonial <strong>and</strong> usually<br />

574<br />

recoverable) <strong>and</strong> non-utilitarian (often ritualistic <strong>and</strong> non-retrievable). Examples of<br />

utilitarian, non-ritual hoards include personal, craftsperson, merchant, <strong>and</strong> foundry<br />

caches. These accumulations, especially <strong>the</strong> foundry caches, customarily have numerous<br />

tools in addition to signs of metallurgical activity, such as fragmentary copper ingots,<br />

scrap metal, <strong>and</strong> slag (but no crucibles <strong>and</strong> tuyères). 575<br />

Hoards that were meant to be inaccessible would qualify as non-utilitarian, a<br />

576<br />

description that includes ritual, votive, <strong>and</strong> foundation deposits. The deliberate<br />

placement of objects within or under a structure’s foundations served “to ensure<br />

protection, benefaction, fertility, legitimacy or longevity for a particular structure.” 577<br />

Votive collections, which are deposited for deities as thank offerings, occur in various<br />

contexts. 578 Bradley’s criteria for non-utilitarian ritual hoards include specialized<br />

locations, a restricted group of items, <strong>and</strong> well-preserved objects. 579<br />

573<br />

Bass 1967; Catling 1964; Branigan 1969; Matthäus <strong>and</strong> Schumacher-Matthäus 1986; Knapp 1988;<br />

Knapp, Muhly, <strong>and</strong> Muhly 1988; Borgna 1995.<br />

574<br />

Bradley 1990, 10-14; Knapp, Muhly, <strong>and</strong> Muhly 1988, 236.<br />

575<br />

Bradley 1990, 14, Table 1.<br />

576<br />

Ellis 1968; Knapp, Muhly, <strong>and</strong> Muhly 1988; Bradley 1990; Harding 2000. The importance of<br />

repossession is made clear by Knapp, Muhly, <strong>and</strong> Muhly (1988, 241), who state: “intentionality of<br />

deposition is not <strong>the</strong> key issue…it is <strong>the</strong> intention to retrieve <strong>the</strong> material that distinguished between<br />

various types of deposits.”<br />

577<br />

Knapp, Muhly, <strong>and</strong> Muhly 1988, 237. For discussion about Mesopotamian foundation deposits, see Ellis<br />

1968.<br />

578<br />

For instance, see Hä nsel <strong>and</strong> Hänsel 1997.<br />

579<br />

Bradley 1990, 14, Table 1.<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!