10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

double ax forms, implies that <strong>the</strong> carpentry/masonry tool connections between Crete <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong> were not as strong as scholars have assumed.<br />

<strong>Aegean</strong> implements are not readily found in Anatolia or <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

Mediterranean, as <strong>the</strong> number of double axes, saws <strong>and</strong> broad chisels are sporadic in <strong>the</strong><br />

east. Preferred on Crete, shafted combination tools are rare in Anatolia <strong>and</strong> Syria-<br />

Palestine, but extant on Cyprus. Shaft-hole axes, single/flat axes, trunnion/lugged blades,<br />

socketed chisels are tool categories that define choices made in Anatolia, Syria-Palestine<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cyprus. Chisels occur in each of <strong>the</strong>se regions as well, particularly in Anatolia,<br />

which included an idiosyncratic series of miniature, chisel-like implements with cutting<br />

edges less than 0.5 cm. Collectively, <strong>the</strong> tool repertoires of Anatolia, Syria-Palestine <strong>and</strong><br />

Cyprus bear a greater resemblance to each o<strong>the</strong>r than with those in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aegean</strong>. <strong>Tools</strong><br />

<strong>from</strong> Crete <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong> must be treated separately, for <strong>the</strong> assemblages in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

regions are not identical. Both areas, however, shared a propensity to employ narrow <strong>and</strong><br />

broad chisels. Finally, it is not surprising that <strong>the</strong> implements aboard <strong>the</strong> Uluburun <strong>and</strong><br />

Gelidonya shipwrecks (Fig. 4.27, <strong>and</strong> Fig. 4.29) consisted of types that were distinctive to<br />

various regions, for each area was partially tied into <strong>the</strong> international shipping <strong>and</strong> trading<br />

routes.<br />

224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!