10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

within each region is notable. Single/flat axes are <strong>the</strong> prevalent MBA tool, because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are extremely abundant in Cyprus <strong>and</strong> Syria-Palestine, yet chisels are probably <strong>the</strong> most<br />

common implement cross-regionally. Shaft-hole axes are typical of Anatolia <strong>and</strong> Syria-<br />

Palestine but also attested on Cyprus <strong>and</strong> Crete. Trunnion/lugged blades <strong>and</strong> socketed<br />

chisels are principally restricted to Anatolia at this time, while double axes are primarily<br />

Cretan. The high production of tools on Crete, especially in relation to <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Aegean</strong>, demonstrates that Protopalatial Crete had access to foreign metal resources,<br />

specifically <strong>from</strong> Cyprus <strong>and</strong> Anatolia. 526<br />

The degree to which metal was available in <strong>the</strong><br />

MBA surely accounts for <strong>the</strong> disproportion of metal tools <strong>from</strong> Cyprus, Anatolia <strong>and</strong><br />

Syria-Palestine in comparison to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aegean</strong>.<br />

Certain MBA tool preferences continue during <strong>the</strong> LBA (Fig. 4.29). Double axes,<br />

chisels <strong>and</strong> saws define tool assemblages <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cretan LBA, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se implements<br />

were already widely utilized in <strong>the</strong> MBA. <strong>Late</strong> Helladic craftspersons regularly<br />

incorporated double axes, chisels, <strong>and</strong> drills into <strong>the</strong>ir repertoire, while implements that<br />

characterize o<strong>the</strong>r regions (e.g. saws, combination tools, socketed chisels,<br />

trunnion/lugged blades, <strong>and</strong> single axes or adzes) were not plentiful on <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong>. The<br />

count of double axes <strong>from</strong> Crete <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong> would suggest a correlation, yet this<br />

connection is not a direct evolution, for important distinctions exist between <strong>the</strong><br />

Mycenaean <strong>and</strong> Minoan versions. Shafted double-ended tools (excluding double axes)<br />

are idiosyncratic of Cretan <strong>and</strong> Cypriot tool assemblages, but scarce elsewhere. This is an<br />

unusual pattern because <strong>the</strong>re is a chronological gap between <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> implements<br />

first on Crete <strong>and</strong> later on Cyprus. These double-sided tools are rare on <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong>; this<br />

observation, combined with <strong>the</strong> low numbers of Mycenaean saws <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> different<br />

526 Poursat <strong>and</strong> Loubet 2005.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!