10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ayia Marina 1 1 chisel<br />

Gona (Macedonia) 1 1 single/flat ax<br />

Table 4.22: <strong>Middle</strong> Helladic carpentry/masonry tool distribution by site<br />

Sites <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> LH mainl<strong>and</strong> cultural sphere:<br />

The diversity of tool types, <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> implements, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> count of sites with<br />

tools <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> LH period is beyond comparison to <strong>the</strong> MH data. The spike in<br />

carpentry/masonry tools occurred primarily during <strong>the</strong> Mycenaean palatial period (LH<br />

IIIA1‒IIIB). There are only 22 wood- <strong>and</strong> stone-working specimens, mainly chisels <strong>and</strong><br />

drills, attributed to <strong>the</strong> early Mycenaean period (MMIII‒LH II). 504<br />

Generally, <strong>the</strong><br />

prominent LBA mainl<strong>and</strong> tools are chisels, double axes <strong>and</strong> drills. While <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Crete both favored <strong>the</strong> double ax as <strong>the</strong>ir preeminent tool, Mycenaean saws do not<br />

match Minoan samples in quantity or size. Mainl<strong>and</strong> double axes are regularly found in<br />

hoards <strong>and</strong> all but two are dated to <strong>the</strong> LH III period.<br />

The majority of double axes were excavated at Mycenae, which coincides with<br />

<strong>the</strong> site’s high retention of tools in relation to o<strong>the</strong>r localities (Table 4.23). The tool count<br />

<strong>from</strong> Mycenae illustrates that wood- <strong>and</strong> stone-working implements were more accessible<br />

<strong>the</strong>re than at any o<strong>the</strong>r mainl<strong>and</strong> site. The second highest yield of implements came <strong>from</strong><br />

Tiryns, but this quantity equates to less than half of <strong>the</strong> Mycenae specimens. This<br />

disproportional allotment contradicts <strong>the</strong> more evenly dispersed Minoan tools. Only eight<br />

wood- <strong>and</strong> stone-working tools were found at <strong>the</strong> Palace of Nestor, <strong>the</strong>reby accentuating<br />

<strong>the</strong> disparity in tool counts among <strong>the</strong> Mycenaean palatial sites. The tools that helped<br />

construct <strong>the</strong> megaron <strong>and</strong> surrounding complex at Pylos were obviously removed <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> site prior to its destruction. The Mycenae <strong>and</strong> Tiryns tools constitute <strong>the</strong> densest<br />

504<br />

Additional tools may be assigned to this period, but this low number represents only those cases that are<br />

definitively dated to this phase.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!