10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Problems with nomenclature occur with <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>from</strong> Crete. Evely describes <strong>the</strong><br />

shafted, single axes <strong>from</strong> Crete merely as “single axes” <strong>and</strong> calls non-shafted examples<br />

“flat axes”. 295 For <strong>the</strong> sake of comparison across regions in this study, <strong>the</strong>se types are<br />

considered shaft-hole axes, yet it should be recognized that <strong>the</strong>re are significant<br />

morphological differences among <strong>the</strong>m. 296<br />

The implement type appears throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

study region during <strong>the</strong> second millennium BC, yet is especially distinctive in certain<br />

regions <strong>and</strong> periods, as summarized in Table 4.1.<br />

Regional total MBA LBA General 2 nd millennium<br />

Crete 17 11 0 6<br />

Mainl<strong>and</strong> 10 0 8 2<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>s 2 0 0 2<br />

Cyprus 15 13 1 1 (EIA)<br />

Anatolia 39 18 16 5<br />

Syria-Palestine 27 15 8 4<br />

Shipwrecks 1 - 1 -<br />

Total 111 57 34 20<br />

Molds for shaft hole<br />

(some fenestrated) axes<br />

(all Anatolian, except<br />

one <strong>from</strong> Byblos)<br />

12 9 2 1<br />

Table 4.1: Shaft-hole ax distribution<br />

Two trends st<strong>and</strong> out for shafted ax blades: <strong>the</strong>ir prevalence in <strong>the</strong> early second<br />

millennium, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir popularity in Anatolia <strong>and</strong> Syria-Palestine. This pattern is<br />

unsurprising given <strong>the</strong> prevalence of <strong>the</strong> ax during <strong>the</strong> third millennium in Iran,<br />

Mesopotamia <strong>and</strong> Luristan. 297 The diversity of this implement is impressive; Maxwell-<br />

Hyslop formed 24 categories of shaft-hole axes while Deshayes classified <strong>the</strong> implement<br />

into 15 typologies, each with numerous sub-groupings. 298<br />

The prominence of shaft-hole<br />

axes in MBA Syria-Palestine <strong>and</strong> Anatolia is connected, however loosely, with <strong>the</strong> earlier<br />

Near <strong>Eastern</strong> tradition of <strong>the</strong> tool. While <strong>the</strong> Syro-Palestinian shaft-hole axes were<br />

295 Evely 1993, 55-58, 72-75.<br />

296 The diversity of <strong>the</strong>se tools has been well recognized. See Deshayes 1960, 228, plates 18 to 29.<br />

297 Maxwell-Hyslop 1949; Deshayes 1960, 229-230; Philip 1989, 60-65.<br />

298 Maxwell-Hyslop 1949, 91-116; Deshayes 1960, catalogue entries 1265‒1840.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!