10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4: Carpentry <strong>and</strong> masonry tools: types <strong>and</strong> distributions by site<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> functional tool categories reviewed in Chapter 3, <strong>the</strong> carpentry/masonry<br />

implements are <strong>the</strong> most common <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir patterns of consumption deserve a closer<br />

look. This chapter thus presents, in three sections, a detailed analysis of <strong>the</strong> types <strong>and</strong><br />

distributions of second millennium tools. The first describes <strong>the</strong> different kinds of<br />

carpentry/masonry implements, records <strong>the</strong>ir dissemination by region <strong>and</strong> period, <strong>and</strong><br />

considers variations in tool size. The second section offers a site-by-site comparison of<br />

<strong>the</strong> quantity <strong>and</strong> types of tools recovered in <strong>the</strong> archaeological record. Through this<br />

method of analysis, important preferences in each area become evident. Several regions<br />

showed a large concentration of tools at one site, while Crete demonstrated a more even<br />

distribution of tools among its major sites. The chapter concludes by summarizing <strong>the</strong><br />

broad regional tool traditions as reflected in <strong>the</strong> selection of carpentry/masonry<br />

implements. By considering <strong>the</strong> nature of each tool type, as well as <strong>the</strong> site-by-site<br />

overview, one may identify specific implements as distinctive to particular regions.<br />

Subsequently, <strong>the</strong> level of cross-cultural interaction, based on tool distributions, may be<br />

evaluated.<br />

I. Carpentry <strong>and</strong> Masonry tool types<br />

The presentation of carpentry <strong>and</strong> masonry tools here does not represent <strong>the</strong> entire<br />

assembly of implements that were available, as some are absent <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> archaeological<br />

record. A few implements, like <strong>the</strong> tubular drill <strong>and</strong> pendulum saw, are deduced <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir markings left on worked materials, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se important implements are discussed in<br />

this chapter. O<strong>the</strong>r necessary tools, such as levers, crowbars, <strong>and</strong> measuring <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

marking instruments, likely existed but are unattested in <strong>the</strong> present data. Devices<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!