10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

metal smiths moved throughout <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape (if at all) are all inconclusive. Some of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se issues are discussed in more detail in <strong>the</strong> concluding chapter.<br />

VII. Utilitarian tools<br />

Utilitarian metal implements (1564 examples) rank second behind<br />

carpentry/masonry tools in terms of overall quantity (Figs. 3.4a, b). Utilitarian tools are<br />

multi-functional; knives, razors, scrapers, spatulas, cleavers, <strong>and</strong> undefined blades are<br />

grouped toge<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong>ir all-purpose character. These objects cannot be classified within<br />

a specific craft category, <strong>and</strong> it is probable that <strong>the</strong>y functioned in a mix of craft <strong>and</strong><br />

personal activities. Given <strong>the</strong>ir nature as cutting implements, <strong>the</strong>se utilitarian tools<br />

(excluding scrapers <strong>and</strong> spatulas) were capable of being used as weapons, but it is<br />

doubtful that <strong>the</strong>y were explicitly designed <strong>and</strong> manufactured for this purpose. The<br />

number of utilitarian objects <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBA <strong>and</strong> LBA is remarkable. These tools occur in<br />

greater quantities in <strong>the</strong> later period, yet <strong>the</strong>y represent a greater portion of <strong>the</strong> MBA’s<br />

total tool count than that of <strong>the</strong> LBA (Fig. 3.4b; Fig. 3.15a, b). The chronological <strong>and</strong><br />

spatial distributions of <strong>the</strong> utilitarian tools indicate localized preferences <strong>and</strong> only a few<br />

cross-cultural similarities. There is a slight increase in <strong>the</strong> proportion of utilitarian<br />

implements <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBA to <strong>the</strong> LBA on Crete. Although <strong>the</strong> overall sum of <strong>the</strong> LH<br />

implements trumps that of <strong>the</strong> earlier era by a large margin, <strong>the</strong> percentage of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

utilitarian tools on <strong>the</strong> mainl<strong>and</strong> (as measured against <strong>the</strong> region’s total count) declined<br />

slightly <strong>from</strong> 51.3% to 49.1% over <strong>the</strong> second millennium. The percentage of utilitarian<br />

tools on Cyprus drops substantially (63% to 21.3%) <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBA to <strong>the</strong> LBA, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is a minimal fall (<strong>from</strong> 15.4% to 11.3%) in <strong>the</strong> Anatolian assemblage <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time.<br />

These patterns illustrate different regional preferences for utilitarian implements.<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!