10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The primary difference between <strong>the</strong> MH <strong>and</strong> LH metallurgical implements is <strong>the</strong><br />

latter’s wider range of tool forms (Fig. 3.14b). Molds are <strong>the</strong> sole MH metalworking<br />

implement, but a diverse selection of LH hot- <strong>and</strong> cold-working tools is preserved. Only<br />

two LH molds are known, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> general absence of <strong>the</strong>se objects on <strong>the</strong> LH mainl<strong>and</strong><br />

underscores <strong>the</strong> lack of archaeological evidence for casting operations in Mycenaean<br />

contexts. Nearly half of <strong>the</strong> LH smithing tools were found at large sites, where<br />

metallurgy was more likely to have transpired. Charcoal shovels for metalworking are<br />

known on Cyprus, <strong>and</strong> a long-h<strong>and</strong>led, elaborate brazier <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vaphio tholos tomb<br />

may be interpreted in <strong>the</strong> same light. 224<br />

This suggestion, however, is speculative, for <strong>the</strong><br />

Vaphio object would be <strong>the</strong> only metallurgical shovel outside of Cyprus.<br />

As with several tool categories, <strong>the</strong> Cypriot consumption patterns of metallurgical<br />

utensils are localized <strong>and</strong> different <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighboring regions. <strong>Metal</strong>working tools are<br />

uncommon in <strong>the</strong> MC period, despite some archaeometallurgical remnants <strong>from</strong> this time<br />

(suggestive of metal workshops) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> remarkably rich assemblage of MC copper-alloy<br />

items. The low quantity <strong>and</strong> infrequency of MC metalworking tools belies <strong>the</strong> apparent<br />

prosperity of <strong>the</strong> early, indigenous metal industry on <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>. Copper-alloy objects in<br />

<strong>the</strong> MC period typically occur in burials, but this context is <strong>the</strong> least common for<br />

metalworking tools. The noteworthy rise in <strong>the</strong> occurrence (both quantity <strong>and</strong> frequency)<br />

<strong>and</strong> variation of LC metalworking tools (tongs, sledgehammers, anvils <strong>and</strong> molds) is<br />

partly due to greater archaeological exploration of settlements <strong>from</strong> that period (Fig.<br />

3.14d). Given <strong>the</strong> more developed <strong>and</strong> expansive LC metallurgical industry, an elevated<br />

incidence of metalworking tools is not surprising. The negligible percentage of MC tools<br />

224 For charcoal shovels on Cyprus, see Catling 1964, 100-101; For <strong>the</strong> Vaphio brazier, see Kilian-<br />

Dirlmeier 1987; Tripathi 1988, 366 entry 1328 with references.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!