10.04.2013 Views

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

Middle and Late Bronze Age Metal Tools from the Aegean, Eastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cold chisels. The distinction between hot <strong>and</strong> cold metalworking tools helps to discern<br />

different stages of metallurgy. Castings, billets, hammers, anvils, files, whetstones <strong>and</strong><br />

cold chisels are objects that suggest secondary or post-firing metal work.<br />

The regional patterns for metallurgical tools reveal interesting cross-cultural<br />

similarities <strong>and</strong> differences. Although Cyprus yielded <strong>the</strong> greatest collection tools <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> MBA, <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> produced only four metallurgical implements <strong>from</strong> that time (Fig.<br />

3.10a, b). MBA tools for metalworking are primarily found on Crete <strong>and</strong> Anatolia (Fig.<br />

3.10a, b), where important early metallurgical sites are recognized (see metallurgical<br />

summary in Chapter 6). The highest regional percentage of metallurgical tools is <strong>from</strong><br />

MBA Anatolia, where molds are <strong>the</strong> predominant implement type (Fig. 3.10a, b; Fig.<br />

3.14e). The LBA Anatolian metallurgical tools are not as frequent as in <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

period, but <strong>the</strong>ir consumption percentage is comparable to Crete <strong>and</strong> Cyprus <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same time (around 8%) <strong>and</strong> suggestive of common craft preferences. As evident in<br />

Anatolia, <strong>the</strong> percentage of metallurgical tools declined on Crete over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong><br />

second millennium. There was a larger assemblage of metalworking utensils <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Cretan LBA, but <strong>the</strong> percentage (Fig. 3.10a) decreased <strong>from</strong> that of <strong>the</strong> MBA. The<br />

preferred metallurgical tool types remained consistent during <strong>the</strong> Cretan second<br />

millennium, although tongs <strong>and</strong> anvils are unknown <strong>from</strong> MM contexts (Fig. 3.14a).<br />

<strong>Aegean</strong> metalworking in <strong>the</strong> MBA preserved a tradition of that craft stemming<br />

<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> third millennium. 221<br />

It is inexplicable why <strong>the</strong> percentage of Cretan <strong>and</strong><br />

mainl<strong>and</strong> metallurgical tools declined <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBA to <strong>the</strong> LBA (Fig. 3.10a, b); <strong>the</strong>se<br />

discussion, wedge-like tools or sledgehammers may have been appropriate implements for this task. No<br />

unambiguous ingot breakers are currently known, yet <strong>the</strong> existence of such a tool is substantiated by logic<br />

<strong>and</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sized for at least two metal objects <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mochlos <strong>Metal</strong> Merchant hoard (see Soles 2008,<br />

151).<br />

221 Day <strong>and</strong> Doonan 2007; Kakavogianni et al. 2008; Muhly 2008b; Gale et al. 2008; Betancourt 2008.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!