10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter One<br />

relational approach to bribery, the logic of the gift accorded with the logic of the<br />

relationship in which it was given.<br />

Take the case of Themistocles and the thirty talents. Recall how, under the<br />

standard view, the payments in Herodotus’ depiction of the Greek fleet’s deliberations at<br />

Artemisium seemed baffling; on a relational view, by contrast, these dōra are perfectly<br />

‘rational’. As Herodotus writes, Themistocles successfully persuades Eurybiades, but<br />

only by giving money as if “in fact” it were coming from himself (w(j par) e(wutou=<br />

dh=qen dh=qen didou/j, Hdt. 8.5). In other words, Themistocles lies about the source of the money<br />

in order to leverage his own friendship with Eurybiades. After all, we can imagine how<br />

Eurybiades might readily accept money from Themistocles—who personally yielded his<br />

command to the Spartan (Plut. Them. 7.3)—but might balk at the idea of taking money<br />

from (or simply being persuaded by the entreaties of) the Euboeans, whose shores<br />

Eurybiades in particular wanted to abandon (Plut. Them. 7.4). 62<br />

Similarly, Themistocles and Adimantus were not on the best of terms—note their<br />

bickering before the Battle of Salamis (Hdt. 8.59-62)—and the dōra given and received<br />

reflect this enmity. Themistocles couches his offer of dōra within a thinly veiled threat:<br />

he flat-out commands Adimantus that the Corinthians not abandon the Greek fleet; and<br />

he ominously refers to bribery by the Persian King, in effect suggesting that, unless<br />

Adimantus were to comply, he would be accused of taking bribes from Xerxes. In an<br />

alternate version, in fact, Themistocles makes precisely this threat to one of his own men<br />

(cf. Plut. Them. 7.4.6). The dōra were calibrated to the dynamics of a specific<br />

relationship in each case.<br />

62 Even if we assume that Eurybiades simply wanted to move the Greek fleet elsewhere to give the Spartans<br />

at Thermoplyae a better chance—so Frost (1980: 106 ad 7.6)—it is crucial that he could not have been<br />

paid by just anyone to do so. Themistocles still had to leverage his own relationship with the Spartan.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!