10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter One<br />

considered bribery if officials follow public opinion and the public interest by regularly<br />

accepting bribes not to heed the law; or, conversely, whether perfectly legal lobbying<br />

efforts or campaign contributions should not, in fact, be considered legalized bribery.<br />

Rather, I am calling into question what is at stake—what is actually being measured—by<br />

terming such instances ‘bribery’.<br />

Certainly it is valuable to try to reduce bribery to an essential core which can then<br />

be compared across normative contexts, but the standard definition seems to<br />

misunderstand the nature of that core. In positing an apolitical, neutral definition of<br />

bribery that need only be adapted to a particular culture’s norms, the standard view<br />

misses the fact that every definition of bribery is a political claim: by marking out what<br />

is considered ‘bad’ government, the actions that constitute bribery negatively define the<br />

contours of good government. 3 To that extent, the standard definition actually posits a<br />

specific normative framework for understanding bribery, while allowing only the<br />

contents of that framework to vary cross-culturally; far from being apolitical or<br />

normatively neutral, the standard definition is, itself, a political, normative definition.<br />

Definitions of ‘abuse’ likewise hinge on the terms by which we define the<br />

workings of good government: whether it functions in accordance with the law, public<br />

interest, or public opinion. While it might be illuminating to measure to what extent<br />

different countries adhere to a given definition of good government, this is ultimately a<br />

bizarre comparison, not least because different polities can be organized under different<br />

guiding principles. Phrased this way, the standard approach to defining and measuring<br />

3 Euben (1989), Philp (1997), Génaux (2004) and, with reference to US campaign contribution debates,<br />

Burke (2006). Harrison (2004) highlights the importance and power entailed in naming something<br />

‘corruption’.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!