10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Seven<br />

Chapter Six, was used against rhētores who had spoken against the best interests of the<br />

dēmos after having taken money. 34 The penalty was variable, but could be an<br />

extraordinary fine or, most often, death.<br />

Essentially, these measures laid out the parameters within which rhētores could<br />

operate: they could gather inspiration for their proposals from any source, and they could<br />

even receive money in exchange for speaking, but they could never speak against the<br />

interests of the people. Within the context of the purportedly grave danger posed by the<br />

New Politicians, these reforms are revealing. In the first place, they clearly illuminate the<br />

legitimacy of this new style, including paying for a public speaker’s services, for in both<br />

cases it was the content—not the source—of the public speech that mattered. Referring<br />

the matter to a court was simply another way to determine whether or not the proposal<br />

was, or should be, publicly legitimate. Rather than ban outright or limit pay for public<br />

proposals, the law allowed public speakers to continue being political entrepreneurs like<br />

Cleon and the like. Wherever they could find new sources or ideas for public policies, so<br />

much the better, provided the policies themselves were ‘democratic’.<br />

Moreover, these laws opened up the courts as an alternative venue to assess and<br />

legitimate policies and policymakers alike. Even if a particular proposal had been passed<br />

in the Assembly, prosecuting a rhētor for proposing it was a way to make the policy less<br />

legitimate. Again, with the eisangelia against the taking of bribes by rhētores, the law<br />

provided merely a guide to the grounds on which someone should be prosecuted.<br />

Ultimately, it was the norm itself—whether or not a particular policy should be<br />

considered legitimate—that was under trial.<br />

34 Hyp. 4.7-8 gives the text of the law. See further discussion in Hansen (1975), Todd (1993: 114-15) and<br />

Chapter Six. Hansen (1975) lists 17 different examples of eisangelia used against a rhētor.<br />

312

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!