BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua
BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua
Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Six fines for dōrodokia towards the end of the fifth century, bribe-takers could also be reintegrated into the polity. As the Athenians began to rethink what to do about the dōrodokos, they also began to rethink who he was in the first place. Chapter Two surveyed the rise of the so- called New Politicians in the second half of the fifth century: citizens whose political authority was based more on their rhetorical abilities than on family wealth or prestige. Individuals like Cleon and Hyperbolus acquired pre-eminent standing because they could persuade the masses through their command of rhetoric. Yet this new style of politics was not without its critics. In the Wasps and Knights Aristophanes decried how politicians like Cleon were effectively corrupting the political process, whether through outright persuasion or, more dangerously, through promises and services to the dēmos. And, indeed, as we saw in Chapter Two, in the second half of the fifth century the Athenians began to condemn giving as much as taking dōra illicitly. Aristophanes’ criticisms are emblematic of an acute anxiety attending the rise of the New Politicians, namely, that political institutions were changing, and not for the better. Contemporary critics of the democracy blamed the fickleness of the masses for unjust court decisions, like the execution of the Arginusae generals; poor collective decisions, like the Sicilian Expedition, which was thought fueled more by the Assembly’s desires than by any prudent deliberation; and unfair policies that disproportionately burdened elites, while the masses enjoyed the fruits of their labor. 45 In each case, the 45 For an overview of these concerns, see Chapters Two and Three. Courts: AP 34.1, Diod. 13.102.5. Assembly: Ober (1998: 104-20, esp. 114-18). The vulnerability of the dēmos to make poor collective decisions at the end of the fifth century is also borne out by the creation of a procedure for illegal proposals, or graphē paranomōn, and the distinction between public decrees (psēphismata) and laws (nomoi) which were forged through the complex process of nomothesia: Hansen (1974) on graphē paranomōn, Harrison (1955), MacDowell (1975), Rhodes (1985), Hansen (1999: 168-9) on nomothesia. Economy: Recall that, beginning in the Peloponnesian War, the Athenians began to levy the eisphora, or war-time tax on the elite: 275
Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Six deliberative process of collective institutions resulted in poor decisions, and within this context of general institutional failure, dōrodokia was increasingly suspected. In many respects, this was a new concern for the democracy. In the first half of the century, the threat of corruption of individual officials was chiefly mitigated by the large size of political bodies: boards of magistrates came in multiples of ten, juries numbered in the hundreds, and assemblies in the thousands, so the potential damage done by a single corrupt individual was limited. Yet, despite their apparently unassailable size, the growing importance of the jury courts and Assembly as arenas for acquiring political authority made them all the more vulnerable to corruption. Especially as the Peloponnesian War progressed and political outcomes worsened, it was here, in these larger political bodies, that critics like Aristophanes feared dōrodokia was taking root. We might relegate these fears to only a specific group of Athenians who were generally critical of what Athens’ polity had become, but it is striking how these new anxieties over democracy were attended (and often preceded) by legal expressions of a new concern about dōrodokia. In the second half of the century, the Athenians began to shift their focus in law from how a public official might be corrupted to how a single individual, like a Cleon, might corrupt an entire political body through persuasion and, it was suspected, dōrodokia. 46 Shifting from bribe-takers to bribe-givers, the legal image of the dōrodokos broadened to include essentially private individuals who came into contact cf. Thuc. 3.19.1, Lys. 21.3, Diod. 13.47.7, 13.52.5, 13.64.4 and generally Christ (2006: 156-62, esp. 161-2) on the increasing economic obligations of the elite during the fifth-century democracy. 46 Scholars commonly note the improbability that large groups of people, whether on juries or at an Assembly, were bribed: e.g. Staveley (1972: 113), Taylor (2007: 325, 329-30). Even despite this improbability, however, the Athenians readily assumed that large groups were, in fact, being bribed: cf. [Xen.] Ath. Pol. 3.7; Thuc. 6. 13.1; Lys. 12.43-4, 29.12; Pl. Tht. 173d; Xen. Symp. 1.4; Isoc. 18.11; Dem. 18.149; AP 27.5. More importantly, by positing that bribery of large groups was infrequent in actuality, these scholars obfuscate the role this assumption played in the workings of the democracy: however unfounded, it shifted in part how the Athenians regulated dōrodokia. 276
- Page 235 and 236: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 237 and 238: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 239 and 240: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 241 and 242: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 243 and 244: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 245 and 246: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 247 and 248: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 249 and 250: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 251 and 252: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 253 and 254: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 255 and 256: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 257 and 258: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 259 and 260: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 261 and 262: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 263 and 264: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 265 and 266: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 267 and 268: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 269 and 270: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 271 and 272: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 273 and 274: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 275 and 276: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 277 and 278: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 279 and 280: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 281 and 282: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 283 and 284: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 285: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 289 and 290: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 291 and 292: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 293 and 294: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 295 and 296: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 297 and 298: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 299 and 300: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 301 and 302: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 303 and 304: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 305 and 306: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 307 and 308: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 309 and 310: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 311 and 312: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 313 and 314: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 315 and 316: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 317 and 318: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 319 and 320: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 321 and 322: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 323 and 324: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 325 and 326: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 327 and 328: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 329 and 330: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 331 and 332: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 333 and 334: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
- Page 335 and 336: Conover Bribery in Classical Athens
Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Six<br />
fines for dōrodokia towards the end of the fifth century, bribe-takers could also be<br />
reintegrated into the polity.<br />
As the Athenians began to rethink what to do about the dōrodokos, they also<br />
began to rethink who he was in the first place. Chapter Two surveyed the rise of the so-<br />
called New Politicians in the second half of the fifth century: citizens whose political<br />
authority was based more on their rhetorical abilities than on family wealth or prestige.<br />
Individuals like Cleon and Hyperbolus acquired pre-eminent standing because they could<br />
persuade the masses through their command of rhetoric. Yet this new style of politics<br />
was not without its critics. In the Wasps and Knights Aristophanes decried how<br />
politicians like Cleon were effectively corrupting the political process, whether through<br />
outright persuasion or, more dangerously, through promises and services to the dēmos.<br />
And, indeed, as we saw in Chapter Two, in the second half of the fifth century the<br />
Athenians began to condemn giving as much as taking dōra illicitly.<br />
Aristophanes’ criticisms are emblematic of an acute anxiety attending the rise of<br />
the New Politicians, namely, that political institutions were changing, and not for the<br />
better. Contemporary critics of the democracy blamed the fickleness of the masses for<br />
unjust court decisions, like the execution of the Arginusae generals; poor collective<br />
decisions, like the Sicilian Expedition, which was thought fueled more by the Assembly’s<br />
desires than by any prudent deliberation; and unfair policies that disproportionately<br />
burdened elites, while the masses enjoyed the fruits of their labor. 45 In each case, the<br />
45 For an overview of these concerns, see Chapters Two and Three. Courts: AP 34.1, Diod. 13.102.5.<br />
Assembly: Ober (1998: 104-20, esp. 114-18). The vulnerability of the dēmos to make poor collective<br />
decisions at the end of the fifth century is also borne out by the creation of a procedure for illegal proposals,<br />
or graphē paranomōn, and the distinction between public decrees (psēphismata) and laws (nomoi) which<br />
were forged through the complex process of nomothesia: Hansen (1974) on graphē paranomōn, Harrison<br />
(1955), MacDowell (1975), Rhodes (1985), Hansen (1999: 168-9) on nomothesia. Economy: Recall that,<br />
beginning in the Peloponnesian War, the Athenians began to levy the eisphora, or war-time tax on the elite:<br />
275