10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Six<br />

political agents. These clauses shifted the focus from accountability in general to<br />

accountability to the dēmos as a whole. As such, they indicate that the Athenians were<br />

especially concerned about actively enforcing their political authority so that officials<br />

consistently complied and acted not simply for themselves, but especially for some<br />

greater good. Further, both measures seem to have configured the dōrodokos in the same<br />

way as an insider who must be cast out of the moral community of the polis. In short,<br />

these early attempts at implementing the democratic hallmark of public accountability<br />

were forged through a desire to rectify the disobedience of the dōrodokos.<br />

This shift from general accountability to informal public accountability was<br />

formalized with Ephialtes’ reforms in 462/1. Although the substance of these reforms is<br />

still a bit murky, Ephialtes almost surely transferred the procedures for holding officials<br />

accountable—the euthyna and probably the eisangelia process as well—from the<br />

Areopagus to the Council of 500 and the jury courts for the former, the Assembly for the<br />

latter. 18 To be sure, these reforms do not seem to have been ‘about’ dōrodokia per se.<br />

Still, the next chapter will illuminate the important role dōrodokia did play in<br />

contemporary public debates about the substance of the reforms. We can note here that<br />

with the reforms the jury courts and Assembly became the new authoritative domains for<br />

judging dōrodokia by public officials. Yet it would take a while before such public<br />

accountability became standardized; as we will now see, the standardization of<br />

institutions for public accountability emerged from the very ways in which the Athenians<br />

articulated a space for addressing new kind of dōrodokia.<br />

18 For an overview of Ephialtes’ reforms, see especially Humphreys (1983: 242-7), Ober (1989: 77-8),<br />

Hansen (1991: 36-7), and see Chapter Seven below. More detailed examinations can be found in Hignett<br />

(1952: 193-213), Wallace (1974; 1985: 83-7), Ostwald (1986: 30-42), Carawan (1987), Raaflaub (2007).<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!