10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Five<br />

introduced a kind of control over an official’s judgments. 75 Because at this time<br />

magistrates like the archons regularly received dōra—court fees of a sort—for their<br />

service as adjudicators, the graphē dōrōn straightforwardly regulated the receipt of these<br />

dōra. 76 If an official had been suspected of giving a crooked judgment because of the<br />

dōra he had taken, any citizen could have lodged an indictment before the Areopagus<br />

Council. If this reconstruction is correct, then the original law against dōrodokia and the<br />

graphē dōrōn procedure were drafted by Solon primarily as recourse to the crooked<br />

judgments of corrupt magistrates.<br />

I would like to underscore two important details in this reconstruction. If we can<br />

push back the Athenian conception of the dōrodokos as a disobedient citizen to the<br />

archaic period, it is striking how readily this figure seems to have been translated into the<br />

Solonian regulation. After all, Solon’s attempt to institute some kind of check on the<br />

judicial process, whether through ephesis or the graphē dōrōn, was analogous to the ways<br />

in which the dēmos would later try to control the disobedient dōrodokos. 77 The penalty<br />

of atimia, in particular, might have implied a kind of disobedience. Frequently atimia<br />

was used as a penalty for magistrates (and citizens) who had failed to perform their civic<br />

duties satisfactorily. 78 One reason why, I suggest, is that precisely because disobedient<br />

officials could not effectively be controlled, they needed to be cast outside the moral<br />

community of the polis. Like the fifth-century dōrodokos, they were essentially insiders<br />

who were forced to become moral outsiders vis-à-vis the rest of the community.<br />

75 On this point, Humphreys (1988: 469-70) is particularly helpful.<br />

76 Archaic Greek law: Hom. Il. 18.507-8 with Gagarin (1975: 105, 109-10); Hom. h. Herm. 324; so, the<br />

judge Deioces claims that he received no profit from his judgments, implying that other judges did profit<br />

(Hdt. 1.97). In Classical Athens, certain kinds of cases regularly required court fees: Dem. 47.64, AP 59.3,<br />

Poll. 8.127; Harrison (1971: 92-4), Hansen (1991: 261).<br />

77 See above Chapter Two and especially below Chapter Six.<br />

78 Hansen (1976: 72-4) surveys the sources.<br />

248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!