10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Five<br />

Towards a Theory of Athenian Legal Innovation:<br />

If how the Athenians innovated is something of a black-box question in Greek<br />

history, how they created legal innovation is perhaps closer to a black hole. Most of the<br />

precious few testimonies we have about deliberative politics in action—Thucydidean<br />

speeches and the occasional report in other historiographers, comic parodies, as well as<br />

scattered, biased references in the orators—pertain to policymaking not legal regulation<br />

in its own right. Recently, in an attempt to explain how the Athenians innovated<br />

politically, Josiah Ober has examined the specific ways in which Athens’ political<br />

institutions aggregated the knowledge of her citizens and thereby fostered collective<br />

action and innovation. 20 Ober’s idea can be helpfully mapped onto legislation like that<br />

on dōrodokia, but we are still left with a couple key questions. First, what kinds of<br />

knowledge were considered ‘expert’, or what kinds of considerations went into drafting<br />

such legislation? Did the Athenians focus only on solving a discrete ‘problem’, or did<br />

they tailor the legislation so that the overall shape of the legal system was ideally<br />

maintained? And second, to what extent did the intended effect of this legislation shape<br />

how it was created? Did the Athenians modify, say, the legal process or penalty involved<br />

so that the law might act as more than a mere deterrent?<br />

For Ober’s framework to be readily applicable to Athenian laws on dōrodokia, we<br />

must unpack the social meaning of that legislation, in effect defining the various kinds of<br />

20 Ober (2008), the basic conclusions of which I build off of in constructing a theory of Athenian legal<br />

innovation. It should be noted that my argument does not require that the Athenians strived for efficiency<br />

in legal regulation, or what we might call legal efficacy. Still, Ober’s perceptive model will be a helpful<br />

backdrop for understanding how the Athenians strove to reach the ‘best’ policy, by whatever criteria that<br />

might be judged. Chapter Seven offers a couple different aims of Athenian laws on dōrodokia, each<br />

predicated on a different way in which the law in action was being used for broader political purposes.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!