10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Four<br />

the people be disgraced for contradicting themselves by honoring someone who later was<br />

shown to be corrupt (Aesch. 3.9). Clearly, this purported network of corruption, like<br />

Demosthenes himself, both threatened the city’s laws and devalued its symbolic economy<br />

of honors. 78<br />

On the other hand, as was noted above, Demosthenes’ activity signaled more than<br />

just a devaluing of the city’s economy of honors; it was a wholesale rejection of that<br />

economy, as well. In this light, it is helpful to return to Demosthenes’ prosecution of<br />

Aeschines to see how this exact same accusation—that Aeschines preferred Philip’s<br />

bribes to the dēmos’ honors—casts Aeschines as a traitor. Pointing out that Aeschines’<br />

bribe-taking achieved nothing for Athens, whereas the Thebans’ own refusal to take<br />

bribes gained them Philip’s favor, Demosthenes explicitly weighs the symbolic rewards<br />

of civic honors against Philip’s bribes:<br />

And what have the [Theban] ambassadors gained? Nothing at all except the satisfaction<br />

of having achieved these results for their city. Ah, but that is worth having, men of<br />

Athens; a glorious reward, if you set any store by that virtue (a)reth/) and good repute<br />

(do/ca) which Aeschines and his friends bartered for money (xrhma/twn a)pe/donto,<br />

Dem. 19.142).<br />

By taking Philip’s dōra, Aeschines manifestly did not pursue the ‘honor and good repute’<br />

offered by the polis. By contrast, Demosthenes juxtaposes his own actions with<br />

Aeschines’ to show how he, himself, acted honorably, pursuing philotimia rather than<br />

Philip’s money (Dem. 19.223). His point is an apt one, for he underscores that a<br />

conscious calculus of values led him to follow a course of truth and justice (tou= dikai/ou<br />

kai\ th=j a)lhqei/aj, Dem. 19.223, cf. 19.28); although each could certainly be pursued for<br />

its own sake, he explicitly calculated that public honor, timē (cf. timhqh/sesqai, Dem.<br />

78 In a similar blending of these two narratives, Demosthenes considered Philip, too, a threat to Athens’<br />

laws and the democracy: Dem. 6.25, 8.41-2.<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!