10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Three<br />

transforming his list of liturgies into an argument from logos, he opens up a<br />

depersonalized space wherein any citizen in his position would have acted the same way<br />

(i.e. not have taken bribes) and consequently would have merited an acquittal (as the<br />

most profitable outcome for the polis). 78<br />

The image of the dōrodokos in Lysias 21 negatively frames a positive image of<br />

political justice, one predicated on impersonal—let us say ‘arms-length’—social distance.<br />

In so doing, that image signals what was a critical shift in how politics was conducted at<br />

the turn of the century. Earlier we saw how changes necessary for financial recovery in<br />

the wake of both the Peloponnesian War and the debt accrued by the Thirty helped shift<br />

the Athenians’ focus towards evaluating the outcome of an action in terms of the money<br />

it might bring the community. As Lysias 21 obliquely suggests, moreover, Athens’<br />

attempts at political recovery in the shadow of the Thirty also contributed to the<br />

transformation of the dōrodokos into a greedy elite. By opening up a greater space for<br />

arms-length ties in the public sphere, within which space the Athenians could frame<br />

political injustice in increasingly impersonal terms, these political reforms sought to<br />

prevent public officials from providing bads for the community’s goods, just as the Thirty<br />

had done.<br />

These changes began immediately with the Amnesty of 403, which signaled a<br />

common desire to make political justice more impersonal. Recall that one hallmark of<br />

the Thirty’s reign was an ad hominem use of political process: they had subverted the<br />

courts to make personal attacks on elite citizens and had personally selected who could<br />

78 That this space is effectively depersonalized, i.e. removed from any personal investment the actors may<br />

have, is clear from the defendant’s comment that, ideally, the benefited should not judge their benefactors<br />

(Lys. 21.22). As he himself notes, however, while such a non-private space would be ideal, it is moot in<br />

his case precisely because he has benefited the entire community (so there is nobody left to judge him).<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!