10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Three<br />

So when Poverty and Chremylus have a debate about Zeus’ wealth, it is the<br />

economic return provided by the god that is at issue (Ar. Pl. 582-91). Poverty reasons<br />

that Zeus could not possibly be rich because a rich god would never crown athletic<br />

victors at his festival with crowns of wild olive; rather, because he was so rich, he would<br />

surely give away valuable gold crowns (Ar. Pl. 582-6). This is precisely the logic<br />

Socrates would later employ in claiming that Asclepius and Achilles could not possibly<br />

have been dōrodokoi. Chremylus responds with a different view: Zeus, rich yet sparing,<br />

chooses merely to save his own wealth while not spending anything on the victors (Ar.<br />

Pl. 587-9). Yet in that case, as Poverty criticizes, he is greedy and stingy<br />

(a)neleu/qeroj…filokerdh/j, Ar. Pl. 591), the same affront leveled against Philocrates in<br />

Lysias 29. As in Lysias 28 and 29, therefore, Wealth measures political justice according<br />

to an economically defined ‘good’ given to the community. As thieves or stingy<br />

members of the community, politicians including dōrodokoi are vilified, while those who<br />

give and take in turn ultimately prosper when Wealth regains his sight at play’s end.<br />

Aristophanes’ use of the ‘rags to riches’ conceit in Wealth is thus readily aligned<br />

with the accusation of profiting ‘at the city’s expense’ found in the speeches against<br />

Ergocles and Philocrates; however, this alignment marks a considerable departure from<br />

fifth-century use of the ‘rags to riches’ trope. In the fifth century, as we saw in the<br />

previous chapter, Aristophanes had lambasted politicians like Cleon for just this sort of<br />

suspicious accumulation of wealth. While such accusations certainly underscored how a<br />

politician may have been escaping democratic accountability, they were nevertheless<br />

leveled at pro-democratic politicians. There was no concern of oligarchic aspirations.<br />

By contrast, the ‘rags to riches’ conceit in Wealth was directed at citizens who were<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!