10.04.2013 Views

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

BRIBERY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Kellam ... - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conover Bribery in Classical Athens Chapter Two<br />

I propose that the reason jury pay and pay for public officials were consistently<br />

associated with ‘feeding’ the dēmos from imperial monies was that they represented self-<br />

conscious ways in which the dēmos was replicating—or, to be more precise, competing<br />

against—Cimon-style patronage. Certainly thinking of these monies as providing,<br />

explicitly, food for the dēmos would have resonated strongly with the way Cimon had<br />

invited his demesmen to dinner. So, too, would the source of the funds: the kōlakretai, or<br />

“collectors of limbs” or “hams” (kw=la),” who probably date back to Solon (AP 7.3) and<br />

whose name suggests a connection to the collection of honorary shares of meat at a<br />

sacrifice. 84 Later dispensing public monies for a range of purposes, the kōlakretai<br />

frequently provided monies associated with public honors, just like the kw=la they<br />

presumably once collected. 85 Moreover, that the payment was called a misthos need not<br />

have connoted a commercial “wage,” but readily could have evoked the honorary misthos<br />

awarded the victorious generals at Eion (cf. Aeschin. 3.183): that is, it may have signaled,<br />

especially, a money from a superior (the dēmos) to a citizen, just like Cimon’s handouts<br />

to his demesemen. 86 If we liken misthophoria to the monies of patronage, which<br />

themselves were derived from the monies of empire, it makes sense that even<br />

misthophoria, though paid for from domestic funds, was nevertheless linked to the<br />

monies of empire.<br />

84 As Samons (2000: 55) notes, jury pay and pay for magistrates are absent from the epigraphic record<br />

dealing with reserves from the sacred treasury. By contrast, sources explicitly attest that the kōlakretai<br />

doled out the payments: Ar. V. 695, 724, schol. Ar. Av. 1541, Hesychius s.v. kwlakre/tai. Cf. Kallet<br />

(1998: 47) and Samons (2000: 57). On the connection between the kōlakretai and the collection of<br />

sacrificial meat, see Samons (2000: 57), Harding (2001: 93-4).<br />

85 On the associations of civic honors and kw=la qua honorary portions of meat, see especially Tsoukala<br />

(2009). In the inscriptional record, we find the kōlakretai dispensing funds for the erection of stelai (IG i 3<br />

11.13-14, 71.25-26, 165.10), paying various religious officials (priestess of Athena Nike, IG i 3 36.10; those<br />

making a theōria to Delphi, Androtion FGrH 324 F 36), and providing meals in the prytaneion (Androtion<br />

FGrH 324 F 36).<br />

86 On this definition of misthos, see especially von Reden (1995a: 89-92).<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!