10.04.2013 Views

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

292 BRITISH ASSOCIATION, MEETING AT EXETER.<br />

dark purple anthers are a mass of some Cryptogamic plant, allied, T<br />

suppose, to the smut of Wheat. .<br />

In tjie bud the pollen grains can be<br />

distinguished, afterwards they are wholly corrupted. There remains a<br />

pretty case of a reversion from a dioecious to a hermaphrodite con-<br />

dition." Subsequently he suggested that the plants might be natural<br />

hybrids. The impression crossed his mind thatj the pollen being de-<br />

stroyed at an early period, the ovarium was developed in compensation.<br />

Miss Becker pursued her observations, and to account for the appear-<br />

ances she had two theories :— 1. That the bisexual plants were cases<br />

of natural reversion to the original form, and that their association<br />

with the fungus disease was accidental. 2. That the parasitic fungus<br />

caused the flowers to assume the bisexual form. She maintained the<br />

last of the two to be the right one. Entering into many considera-<br />

tions in support of her view, she suggested that it might be an instance<br />

in illustration of Darwin's theory of Pangenesis. Dr. Dickson thought<br />

Miss Becker's theory unsupported by the evidence. Precedent disease<br />

of the LycJmis was the probable cause of the fungus growing in it.<br />

Dr. Wilkes questioned the notion that a fungus parasite could help in<br />

developing the organs of a plant.— Professor Balfour, while acknow-<br />

ledging the excellence of the paper, disagreed with Miss Becker's con-<br />

clusion. If Miss Becker was right, the instance was the first known<br />

to the botanical world.—Miss Becker replied cleverly. Perhaps it was<br />

the first instance, but why might not she make the first discovery of<br />

it ? She was (piite prepared to hear that they disagreed with her view,<br />

for, as far as she had observed, that section was remarkable for this,<br />

that everybody disagreed with everybody else. [Compare leading article<br />

in 'Gardeners' Chronicle,' Sept. <strong>25</strong>, 1869, on this subject. Ed.]<br />

" On the Relative Value of the Characters employed in the Classijica-<br />

tioH of Plants.'' By Dr. Maxwell T. Masters. This paper was de-<br />

voted to the consideration of some of the means employed by botanists<br />

in elaborating the "natural" systems of classification, and to the esti-<br />

mation of the relative value to be attached to these means. The cha-<br />

racters treated of were the following :— 1, characters derived from the<br />

relative frequency of occurrence of a particular form, or a particidar<br />

aiTangement of organs ; 2, developmental characters, whether " conge-<br />

nital" or "acquired;" 3, teratological characters; 4, rudimentary<br />

characters; 5, special physiological characters; 6, eluiracters dependent<br />

on geographical distribulion. Illustrations were given in explanation<br />

—<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!