1 Earliest Rome

1 Earliest Rome 1 Earliest Rome

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

11.13 Constantine and the Church 11.13b Gift to African church and fears of schism (winter A.D. 312—313) Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History X.6 This letter of Constantine (quoted by Eusebius) is the earliest evidence of imperial gifts to the Christian church. It also illustrates (in the second part of the letter) Constantine s concern with the 'true' church, which was to be influential in the establishment of'orthodox' practice and belief within the church (see 12.7e). See further: Vol. 1, 367-8; Frend (1952) 141-68*; Millar (1977) 583-90. Constantine Augustus to Caecilian bishop of Carthage [greeting?!: Since I have decided that in all provinces, namely of Africa, Numidia and Mauritania, something should be supplied for the expenses of some specific ministers of the legitimate and most holy catholic religion, I have sent a letter to Ursus, the most illustrious Financial Officer of Africa and I have indicated to him that he should be careful to pay 3, 000 folks to your Constancy 1 Therefore, when you get receipt of the said sum of money, you should instruct that the money be distributed to all the specified people according to the brief sent to you by Ossius. 2 But if you find that anything is lacking to fulfil my policy in relation to them all, you must not hesitate to ask Fieracleides the procurator of our estates for what you find to be necessary For I ordered him in person, that if your Constancy asked him for any money, he should be careful to pay it without delay. Since I have learned that some persons of unsound mind wish to pervert the people of the most holy catholic church with a foul seduction, 3 you should know that 1 have given instructions in person to Anulinus the Governor and also to Patricius the Deputy Prefect that they should pay due attention to this as well as to all other matters, and that they should not let themselves overlook something like this occurring. Therefore, if you should see any such people continuing in this madness, go without any hesitation to the said officers and bring this very thing to their attention so that, as I told them in person, they can correct them. May the divinity of the great god protect you for many years. 1. The^S/Z/sis a late Roman term of currency and accounting. The value of [he gift is uncer­ tain, bur presumably quite considerable, f-'or comparison, note a fine of 30 folks [CTh XI.36.2, A.D. 315) and alleged peculation of 20, 100 and 400 f biles in the African church (CSEL xxv 1.194. A.D. 311-20). 2. Ossius, bishop of Corduba in Spain, who advised Constantine on Christianity. 3. Constantine had been told, it seems, about the growing schism ('Donatism') which denied the legitimacy of the consecration of Caecilian as bishop of Carthage. 285

I I . T H R E A T S T O T H E R O M A N O R D E R 11.14 Theodosius' ban on sacrifices (A.D. 392) Tbeodosian Codexv\.\\l.12 From Conscantine onwards Christian emperors issued a series of regulations against the traditional cults (many of which were later collected in the Tbeodosian CodeXVl). The regulations are numerous and apparently repetitive - which may suggest widespread disobedience and repeated attempts to restate the ban on traditional practice. But overall they represent a progressive outlawing of the traditional cults, as the different specific aspects of these cults are, piece by piece, brought under the ban. The Emperor Theodosius acted against divination, secularized traditional temples, reformed the calendar (cf. 3.6) and (in the ruling quoted here) issued a comprehensive ban on traditional sacrifices. Note how the language earlier used against illicit divination (11.7) is extended to cover the whole of the traditional rites, which in a striking reversal of terminology are now themselves seen as superstitio. See further: Vol. 1, 386-8; 6.8 for Christians and sacrifice; Cochrane (1940) 318-57*; Noethlichs (1971) 166-82; Salzman (1993). Emperors Theodosius, Arcadius and Honorius to Rufinus, Praetorian Prefect: Absolutely no person of any class or order of men of rank, whether he holds a position of power or has held such office, whether he is powerful by chance of birth or lowly in family, station or fortune, shall in any place whatsoever or in any city slaughter an innocent victim to insensate images; nor shall he venerate by a more secret sacrifice his Lar with fire, his genius with wine or his Penates with incense, nor shall he light candles, burn incense or hang up garlands for them. But if anyone does dare to offer up a victim for the purpose of sacrificeyor to consult the living entrails, he may be brought to trial, on the model of high treason, on the basis of information lodged by anyone and may receive the appropriate sentence, even if he has not made any plan against or enquiry about the well- being of the emperors. To constitute a serious crime it is sufficient to wish to undo the laws of nature herself, to investigate illicit things, to reveal what is hidden, to attempt what is forbidden, to enquire about the end of another's life or to have hopes based on someone else's death. However, if a person, by the burning of incense, should venerate images made by human hand and destined to suffer the ravage of rime, or should he, suddenly filled with absurd fear of what he himself has made, either garland a tree with sacred ribbons or erect an altar of turves, or attempt to honour vain images with an offering which, though humble, is nevertheless completely offensive to religio: he shall be found guilty of violating religio and have confiscated that house or property in which it is established he served a pagan superstitio. For we decree that every location where it it is proven that the burning of incense has occurred, provided that the location is clearly the legal property of those burning the incense, shall be transferred to our Treasury. But if anyone attempts to perform this sort of sacrifice in public temples or shrines or in 286

I I . T H R E A T S T O T H E R O M A N O R D E R<br />

11.14 Theodosius' ban on sacrifices (A.D. 392)<br />

Tbeodosian Codexv\.\\l.12<br />

From Conscantine onwards Christian emperors issued a series of regulations<br />

against the traditional cults (many of which were later collected in the<br />

Tbeodosian CodeXVl). The regulations are numerous and apparently repetitive<br />

- which may suggest widespread disobedience and repeated attempts to restate<br />

the ban on traditional practice. But overall they represent a progressive outlawing<br />

of the traditional cults, as the different specific aspects of these cults are,<br />

piece by piece, brought under the ban. The Emperor Theodosius acted against<br />

divination, secularized traditional temples, reformed the calendar (cf. 3.6) and<br />

(in the ruling quoted here) issued a comprehensive ban on traditional<br />

sacrifices. Note how the language earlier used against illicit divination (11.7) is<br />

extended to cover the whole of the traditional rites, which in a striking reversal<br />

of terminology are now themselves seen as superstitio.<br />

See further: Vol. 1, 386-8; 6.8 for Christians and sacrifice; Cochrane (1940)<br />

318-57*; Noethlichs (1971) 166-82; Salzman (1993).<br />

Emperors Theodosius, Arcadius and Honorius to Rufinus, Praetorian Prefect: Absolutely<br />

no person of any class or order of men of rank, whether he holds a position of power or<br />

has held such office, whether he is powerful by chance of birth or lowly in family, station<br />

or fortune, shall in any place whatsoever or in any city slaughter an innocent victim to<br />

insensate images; nor shall he venerate by a more secret sacrifice his Lar with fire, his<br />

genius with wine or his Penates with incense, nor shall he light candles, burn incense or<br />

hang up garlands for them. But if anyone does dare to offer up a victim for the purpose<br />

of sacrificeyor to consult the living entrails, he may be brought to trial, on the model of<br />

high treason, on the basis of information lodged by anyone and may receive the<br />

appropriate sentence, even if he has not made any plan against or enquiry about the well-<br />

being of the emperors. To constitute a serious crime it is sufficient to wish to undo the<br />

laws of nature herself, to investigate illicit things, to reveal what is hidden, to attempt<br />

what is forbidden, to enquire about the end of another's life or to have hopes based on<br />

someone else's death.<br />

However, if a person, by the burning of incense, should venerate images made by<br />

human hand and destined to suffer the ravage of rime, or should he, suddenly filled with<br />

absurd fear of what he himself has made, either garland a tree with sacred ribbons or erect<br />

an altar of turves, or attempt to honour vain images with an offering which, though<br />

humble, is nevertheless completely offensive to religio: he shall be found guilty of<br />

violating religio and have confiscated that house or property in which it is established he<br />

served a pagan superstitio. For we decree that every location where it<br />

it is proven that the burning of incense has occurred, provided that the location is clearly<br />

the legal property of those burning the incense, shall be transferred to our Treasury. But if<br />

anyone attempts to perform this sort of sacrifice in public temples or shrines or in<br />

286

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!