The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

8. The Plan has targeted to make the judiciary dynamic and effective so as to bring about
judicial reforms. The Plan presumes that the leadership of the judiciary, chiefs of the
organizations, judicial manpower and other stakeholders shall from their respective sectors
provided positive assistance for attainment of its objective. Provided, there is defiance
against the changes by these parties, then the Plan will not be able to achieve the desired
results.
9. The Plan through the application of information technology proposes to maintain electronic
records of many subject matters and also proposes to expand information network. However,
due to technical difficulties, insufficient resources and other risks that may be encountered in
this sector may have a direct impact on the Plan.
S.
No.
1. Availability
of logistics
Table 19
Risk Analysis Table
Risk Area Impact Result
2. Review of
laws
3. Fulfillment
of
manpower
4. Fulfillment
of judges
5. Social
Security
6. Relation
with
stakeholders
7. Information
technology
8. Defiance
against
change
Improvement in
infrastructure, increase in
motivation and capacity of
manpower, activities
related to information
technology
operational
cannot be
Failure in reform in
procedure
Excess workload
exceeding
person
capacity per
Excess workload
exceeding
judge
capacity per
Feeling of insecurity,
development of escaping
nature, apathy
Lack of expected
cooperation
stakeholders
from
Insecurity of records and
destruction
infrastructure
of
Failure
activities
in operating
Adverse affect in case
management plan
Failure in formulation of time
table for case management and
work plan regarding disposal of
case
Reduction in quality and quantity
of performance of work
Reduction in quality and quantity
of performance of work
Obstruction in field activities,
reduction in execution of
judgment and reduction in
recovery of sentencing and
punishment
Delay in dispensing and
disposing cases
Update of record and activities
related to information
technology affected
Delay in finalizing cases and
reduction in disposal of case
79
Probability
of risk
Strategy
Maximum 1,3,4,5
Maximum 9
General 3
General 3
General 7
General 10
Less 1,5,7
General 1-12
Mitigating Measures
Through the various strategic interventions mentioned hereinabove, efforts to mitigate the risk
have been done. In addition to the above strategic interventions the following efforts are
deemed necessary to mitigate the above mentioned risks.