10.04.2013 Views

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

under the courts. While doing so, special consideration should be given to the development<br />

of library system.<br />

• During the period of the first Plan, remarkable achievements have been made in the area of<br />

information and media technology and this should be expanded further. While doing so,<br />

consideration should be given towards applying this technology in case management,<br />

execution of judgment, record management etc. and sufficient manpower within the<br />

judiciary should be developed so as to apply the technology.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> current practice of inspection and supervision is not satisfactory. This is basically<br />

limited to legal formalities. <strong>The</strong>refore, mechanisms for inspection and supervision should be<br />

strengthened, maximum application of information technology for development of<br />

automated monitoring system should be carried and development of data regarding work<br />

performance of judges and employees should be done which should be linked with career<br />

development.<br />

• Although there is no active conflict in the country, strengthening of security of judges,<br />

employees, lawyers and parties to a case is still a matter of concern. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />

essential to minimize the risk arising from purchase of land to development of physical<br />

infrastructure and performance of work of court.<br />

• Judicial independence and autonomy was an issue raised in the first Plan. It is necessary<br />

to strengthen judicial independence, effective implementation of code of conduct for<br />

ascertaining judicial obligation and financial discipline and to establish complaint hearing<br />

mechanism inside the court.<br />

• Judicial work is research oriented and therefore, the judiciary should institutionalize<br />

research regarding adjudication, justice system and judicial reform. For this the judiciary<br />

should give special priority towards strengthening research mechanism and reform in laws<br />

related to justice. If this is done, judicial work will be speedy, efficient, less expensive and in<br />

order to frame laws judiciary should initiate steps with concerned stakeholders.<br />

• Justice will not be effective by the single effort of the judiciary. For this, it is necessary to<br />

institutionalize and strengthen the relation with the stakeholders of the justice sector and it<br />

is also necessary to regulate and manage relations with donor agencies and other nongovernmental<br />

organizations.<br />

• Access to justice was one of the issues that were given special importance in the first Plan.<br />

In order to increase the courts social relevance, it is necessary to ascertain access to<br />

judicial information for the stakeholders, promote legal aid and mediation and to strengthen<br />

the services provided to court users. While doing that, programs should be framed focusing<br />

on the disabled parties.<br />

• In the end, for successful implementation of the Plan, it is essential to establish and<br />

strengthen plan formulation and implementation mechanism, transfer of skills regarding<br />

plan implementation and monitoring and evaluation should be prioritized.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!