The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
under the courts. While doing so, special consideration should be given to the development<br />
of library system.<br />
• During the period of the first Plan, remarkable achievements have been made in the area of<br />
information and media technology and this should be expanded further. While doing so,<br />
consideration should be given towards applying this technology in case management,<br />
execution of judgment, record management etc. and sufficient manpower within the<br />
judiciary should be developed so as to apply the technology.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> current practice of inspection and supervision is not satisfactory. This is basically<br />
limited to legal formalities. <strong>The</strong>refore, mechanisms for inspection and supervision should be<br />
strengthened, maximum application of information technology for development of<br />
automated monitoring system should be carried and development of data regarding work<br />
performance of judges and employees should be done which should be linked with career<br />
development.<br />
• Although there is no active conflict in the country, strengthening of security of judges,<br />
employees, lawyers and parties to a case is still a matter of concern. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />
essential to minimize the risk arising from purchase of land to development of physical<br />
infrastructure and performance of work of court.<br />
• Judicial independence and autonomy was an issue raised in the first Plan. It is necessary<br />
to strengthen judicial independence, effective implementation of code of conduct for<br />
ascertaining judicial obligation and financial discipline and to establish complaint hearing<br />
mechanism inside the court.<br />
• Judicial work is research oriented and therefore, the judiciary should institutionalize<br />
research regarding adjudication, justice system and judicial reform. For this the judiciary<br />
should give special priority towards strengthening research mechanism and reform in laws<br />
related to justice. If this is done, judicial work will be speedy, efficient, less expensive and in<br />
order to frame laws judiciary should initiate steps with concerned stakeholders.<br />
• Justice will not be effective by the single effort of the judiciary. For this, it is necessary to<br />
institutionalize and strengthen the relation with the stakeholders of the justice sector and it<br />
is also necessary to regulate and manage relations with donor agencies and other nongovernmental<br />
organizations.<br />
• Access to justice was one of the issues that were given special importance in the first Plan.<br />
In order to increase the courts social relevance, it is necessary to ascertain access to<br />
judicial information for the stakeholders, promote legal aid and mediation and to strengthen<br />
the services provided to court users. While doing that, programs should be framed focusing<br />
on the disabled parties.<br />
• In the end, for successful implementation of the Plan, it is essential to establish and<br />
strengthen plan formulation and implementation mechanism, transfer of skills regarding<br />
plan implementation and monitoring and evaluation should be prioritized.<br />
68