The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

supremecourt.gov.np
from supremecourt.gov.np More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

long period to make its impact on the performance of the work of the judiciary. It is necessary to be aware that such trainings and study should not be limited to personal interest and opportunity for promotion but should be deemed to be an institutional necessity. For the enhancement of the capacity of the manpower involved in the judiciary, the National Judicial Academy besides providing training on various subject matters for the judges, employees, legal profession and other government officers has also been conducting studies and research on justice and legal sectors. Besides this, the Supreme Court and the Judicial Council has also provided and conducted orientation and interaction programs. Induction and in-service training programs for employees of the judicial service is being conducted by Judicial Service Training Center. In order to utilize the skills acquired through the training it is necessary to identify the training needs and on the basis of the need, training should be conducted and a human resource development plan for the purpose of establishing an information bank regarding trainings, training policy and standards for conducting training should be determined. From the discussions with the concerned stakeholders, it has been evident that there is a wide range of apathy among the judicial manpower. Although, the personal work performance of the manpower involved in the judiciary is satisfactory, the institutional performance in comparison to the personal performance is not satisfactory. There is no certainty in transfer and promotion. All opportunities are based in coincidence. Factual and measurable standards have not been determined for evaluating a person’s performance. Work description has not been implemented which has an effect on evaluation of performance of work. For the proper management of transfer, promotion and career development within the judiciary, it is necessary to determine a factual, permanent and automated standard. In order to motivate the manpower involved inside the judiciary it is not only necessary to provide them with monetary and non-monetary facilities but simultaneously work performance standard should also be determined and mechanism for evaluating the work performance should also be determined and their work performance should be linked to their career development. Efforts towards institutionalizing the application and use of information technology in the proceedings of the judiciary have been made during the period of the past Plan. Although all levels of the court have received computers, courts other than the Supreme Court have not received sufficient amount of computers. From among 4150 quotas available for utilizing the computer, 295 are in the Supreme Court, 650 in the Appellate Court and 2188 in the District Court thereby bringing the total number of quotas to 3133. 107 The computers available at the Supreme Court is deemed sufficient for the manpower that is currently available at the Supreme Court whereas it is deemed necessary to fulfill 382 and 1801 quotas at the Appellate and District Courts respectively. Although basic training on the application of computers have been provided to majority of the employees at the appellate and district level, it has not been possible to link the proceedings of the court with the information technology. In order to follow the case management system based on the information technology, it is necessary to provide advanced training on computers so as to develop and generate sufficient manpower in each court. For the purpose of achieving the target projected by the Plan, there has to be continuity in fulfillment of manpower pursuant to its need. Likewise, attraction, motivation, capacity enhancement should also be provided and the capacity should be utilized to the maximum so as to 107 Computer and description of manpower utilizing the computer has been provided in Annex 3 53

eap benefits for the organization and this is deemed to be one of the challenges for the second Plan. The assistant employees who are appointed by the courts lack basic legal knowledge and this has an impact in the justice dispensing process. Universities have closed down the certificate level for law students and for an assistant employee to be qualified for the judicial service is required to possess a certificate in any discipline which has created some problems and the judiciary has taken note of this situation. Where the services and facilities for employees involved in the campaign of dispensing justice is not sufficient, tends to lower their morale. Majority of the assistant employees have opined and expressed for enactment of an umbrella Act for addressing the judicial manpower and distribution of services and facilities. Provided, this is not sufficiently addressed may have a negative effect on the implementation of the strategic plan and the judiciary should remain alert in this regard. 4.1.4 Development of physical infrastructure Physical Resources The judiciary shall have to manage land and buildings for 101 judicial bodies including the following courts: Supreme Court -1, Appellate Court – 16, District Court – 75, Administrative Court – 1, Special Court – 1, Labor Court – 1, and other tribunals. Detailed description of land and building including resident of each court has been provided in Annex 4 and 5. 108 Situation of Land Supreme Court as of this date has not been able to obtain land pursuant to the prescribed standard. The number of cases at the Supreme Court, judges and number of employees and description of land has been provided in Annex 4 (a). Four Appellate Courts have received land pursuant to the prescribed standard for office building and residence whereas 12 Appellate Courts have not received land pursuant to the prescribed standard. Appellate and District Courts of Ilam, Baglung and Jumla are located within the same building. It is necessary to manage land pursuant to the prescribed standard for 12 Appellate Courts. The number of cases at the Appellate Courts, judges and number of employees and description of land pursuant to the prescribed standard has been provided in Annex 4 (b). 35 District Courts have received land pursuant to the prescribed standard for office building and residence whereas 44 District Courts have not received land pursuant to the prescribed standard. From among the available land, the land of 31 District Courts are scattered within 2 to 10 plots of land. Land of Baglung, Jumla and Ilam District Court are jointly registered in the name of the Appellate Courts, whereas land for Dhanusha District Court is under the ownership of a Trust. Land for Kathmandu and Bhaktapur District Court is merely under their possession. Some of the land registered in the name of Makwanpur District Court falls in Bhimphedi and likewise some of the land registered in the name of Ramechhap District Court falls in Ramechhap market. Although, land pursuant to the prescribed standards have been available for the District Courts, it is necessary to manage the land that is scattered in different plots and places and it is deemed necessary to purchase land pursuant to the prescribed standard for office and residence. The 108 Standard regarding office building, residence and land of courts: Study report on Physical Infrastructure and Resources of Courts, 2062 54

long period to make its impact on the performance of the work of the judiciary. It is necessary to be<br />

aware that such trainings and study should not be limited to personal interest and opportunity for<br />

promotion but should be deemed to be an institutional necessity.<br />

For the enhancement of the capacity of the manpower involved in the judiciary, the National<br />

Judicial Academy besides providing training on various subject matters for the judges, employees,<br />

legal profession and other government officers has also been conducting studies and research on<br />

justice and legal sectors. Besides this, the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> and the Judicial Council has also<br />

provided and conducted orientation and interaction programs. Induction and in-service training<br />

programs for employees of the judicial service is being conducted by Judicial Service Training<br />

Center. In order to utilize the skills acquired through the training it is necessary to identify the<br />

training needs and on the basis of the need, training should be conducted and a human resource<br />

development plan for the purpose of establishing an information bank regarding trainings, training<br />

policy and standards for conducting training should be determined.<br />

From the discussions with the concerned stakeholders, it has been evident that there is a wide<br />

range of apathy among the judicial manpower. Although, the personal work performance of the<br />

manpower involved in the judiciary is satisfactory, the institutional performance in comparison to<br />

the personal performance is not satisfactory. <strong>The</strong>re is no certainty in transfer and promotion. All<br />

opportunities are based in coincidence. Factual and measurable standards have not been<br />

determined for evaluating a person’s performance. Work description has not been implemented<br />

which has an effect on evaluation of performance of work. For the proper management of transfer,<br />

promotion and career development within the judiciary, it is necessary to determine a factual,<br />

permanent and automated standard. In order to motivate the manpower involved inside the<br />

judiciary it is not only necessary to provide them with monetary and non-monetary facilities but<br />

simultaneously work performance standard should also be determined and mechanism for<br />

evaluating the work performance should also be determined and their work performance should be<br />

linked to their career development.<br />

Efforts towards institutionalizing the application and use of information technology in the<br />

proceedings of the judiciary have been made during the period of the past Plan. Although all levels<br />

of the court have received computers, courts other than the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> have not received<br />

sufficient amount of computers. From among 4150 quotas available for utilizing the computer, 295<br />

are in the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, 650 in the Appellate <strong>Court</strong> and 2188 in the District <strong>Court</strong> thereby<br />

bringing the total number of quotas to 3133. 107 <strong>The</strong> computers available at the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> is<br />

deemed sufficient for the manpower that is currently available at the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> whereas it is<br />

deemed necessary to fulfill 382 and 1801 quotas at the Appellate and District <strong>Court</strong>s respectively.<br />

Although basic training on the application of computers have been provided to majority of the<br />

employees at the appellate and district level, it has not been possible to link the proceedings of the<br />

court with the information technology. In order to follow the case management system based on<br />

the information technology, it is necessary to provide advanced training on computers so as to<br />

develop and generate sufficient manpower in each court.<br />

For the purpose of achieving the target projected by the Plan, there has to be continuity in<br />

fulfillment of manpower pursuant to its need. Likewise, attraction, motivation, capacity<br />

enhancement should also be provided and the capacity should be utilized to the maximum so as to<br />

107<br />

Computer and description of manpower utilizing the computer has been provided in Annex 3<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!