The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Particulars<br />
TABLE: 15<br />
Case Disposal Rate Per Judges<br />
48<br />
<strong>Supreme</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong><br />
Average of Four Years<br />
Appellate <strong>Court</strong>s<br />
District<br />
<strong>Court</strong>s<br />
New Registration 5,696 10,853 32,836<br />
New case per Judge 271 129 261<br />
Total disposal 6,900 10,933 31,167<br />
Number of disposal per Judge 327 100 130 101 248<br />
Ratio of disposal in comparison to new registration 121 101 95<br />
Total number including pending balance 21,144 20,534 61,945<br />
Number of cases per judge in comparison to total cases 933 254 494<br />
Average disposal of five Judges disposing majority of cases 482 102 290 103 510<br />
<strong>The</strong> above table shows that in comparison to new registration, the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has been<br />
capable of disposing additional 21% of the cases. In comparison to new registration although it can<br />
be observed that all the Appellate <strong>Court</strong>s have been able to dispose 81.8% of the cases in the<br />
fourth year, it can be drawn that the courts have been capable in disposing an average of 10.1% of<br />
the cases only. With regards to the District <strong>Court</strong>, the District <strong>Court</strong>s have been able to dispose<br />
79.3% and 89.4% of the case in comparison to new registration during the second and fourth year<br />
which is very low whereas during the first and third year the District <strong>Court</strong> has been able to dispose<br />
106.2% and 104.1% which is higher than the rate of registration and in general the court has been<br />
able to dispose 95% of the case in comparison to its new registration.<br />
From above it can be drawn that under the current infrastructure and environment, the <strong>Supreme</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>, Appellate <strong>Court</strong> and the District <strong>Court</strong>s are competent in disposing cases with regards to<br />
new registration and this is evident from the data available. For example, for the past four years<br />
the rate of disposal per judge for all the judges of the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> was 341, 327, 287 and 311.<br />
In other words the average disposal was 327, whereas the highest average disposal rate during<br />
those years by five judges reads as 482 cases per judge. From this data it is evident that under the<br />
current infrastructure provided all the benches were to dispose the cases equivalent to the average<br />
number of cases disposed by the five judges, the pending balance of cases could be reduced by<br />
two third.<br />
Likewise, the Appellate <strong>Court</strong>s have been successful in disposing cases in comparison to new<br />
registration.<br />
100<br />
Number of disposal of cases by judge of the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> and Appellate <strong>Court</strong> has been based on Division Bench,<br />
this number is two times greater than the number based on a single judge<br />
101<br />
ibid<br />
102<br />
ibid<br />
103<br />
ibid