10.04.2013 Views

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

courts were not in accordance with the high standard set therein and had recommended for<br />

addition of various posts and quota for resolution of the problem.<br />

Pursuant to the recommendation made by the Committee, a separate technical unit has been<br />

established in the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, provisions for security officers, store officers have been made.<br />

Likewise, standard for hiring technical and office assistants on a contractual basis has been<br />

determined and pursuant to the standards set appointments are being made and some of the<br />

quota have been approved and post have been fulfilled. With regards to other posts including the<br />

post of Registrar General, necessary actions have been initiated for obtaining approval.<br />

Some of the activities incorporated during the mid-review had been reviewed wherein activities<br />

such as strengthening the Plan Implementation Secretariat was incorporated. Likewise,<br />

preparation of work plan upon review of survey management has also been envisaged and<br />

activities relating to implementation of management plan and commencement of procedures<br />

relating to evaluation of work have also been decided.<br />

With regards to commencement of procedures relating to evaluation work, a Task Force has been<br />

constituted with representatives from the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, Appellate <strong>Court</strong>, Judicial Council, District<br />

<strong>Court</strong> and Tribunal and the Task Force had been provided with a work order to submit its report in<br />

this regard within two months. Although a decision to this effect has been taken no further progress<br />

has been observed.<br />

3.3.2 To pursue for increased budgetary allocation and secure financial autonomy in<br />

disbursement and expenditure<br />

For the purpose of conducting the regular activities of the judiciary, the Plan had projected some<br />

concrete actions regarding acquisition of financial autonomy and appropriation of sufficient budget<br />

and distribution of the same pertaining to its priority and need. Under this, presentation of the<br />

budget along with the activities, drafting of appropriate policy for financial autonomy and autonomy<br />

to work with donor organizations were included.<br />

In order to include the Plan in the national plan and for implementation of the Plan formal requests<br />

have been made to the Ministry of Finance for appropriation of necessary budget and National<br />

Planning Commission for inclusion of the Plan in the national plan. Efforts have been made for<br />

appropriation of budget for the implementation of the Plan. During this period although there has<br />

been an increment in the budget for the judiciary, the judiciary is yet to receive sufficient budget. 47<br />

A Committee on Financial and Judicial Autonomy 48 had been established to conduct a study on the<br />

judicial, financial and administrative autonomy of the judiciary. <strong>The</strong> Committee had highlighted that<br />

financial and administrative autonomy of the judiciary should be prescribed in the Constitution, that<br />

the judiciary should be vested with the authority to frame rules deemed necessary for operating the<br />

works of the judiciary. <strong>The</strong> committee recommended for establishment of a Financial Management<br />

Committee to be chaired by the Chief Justice and represented by justice of the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

Finance Minister, Vice-Chairman of National Planning Commission or a Member designated to<br />

look into the affairs of the judiciary and Registrar of the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> as Member-Secretary. It<br />

also recommended that the said Committee should formulate the budget for the judiciary and<br />

submit it to the National Planning Commission wherein the Commission should include the budget<br />

in its annual budget and to submit the budget, remuneration, services and facilities of justices and<br />

employees of the court before the Parliament and for the purpose of assisting the Financial<br />

47<br />

With regards to the budget the same has been mentioned in 3.2.3.2<br />

48<br />

This Committee had been constituted under the coordination of Honorable Justice Balaram K.C., <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!