10.04.2013 Views

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Three<br />

Review of First Plan<br />

3.1 Background<br />

<strong>The</strong> first Plan of the judiciary had identified four core functions of the judiciary and<br />

separate target had been identified for each function. In order to evaluate the results with<br />

the determined standard and time frame, result indicators had also been prescribed.<br />

3.2 Core Functions<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision of advisory function on constitutional and legal issues had been<br />

discontinued by the Interim Constitution, 2063, wherein this core function was deemed<br />

irrelevant and as such the advisory function of the judiciary was removed upon mid-term<br />

review. <strong>The</strong> achievements of the task that were given continuity till the end of the Plan<br />

period are given herein below:<br />

3.2.1 Adjudication Function<br />

3.2.1.1 Examination of constitutionality of law<br />

Writ petition registered pursuant to Article 88 (1) of the Constitution of the Kingdom of<br />

<strong>Nepal</strong>, 1990, and Article 107 (1) of the Interim Constitution, were determined to be<br />

disposed within one year from the date of registration of such petitions. Disposal record of<br />

writ petition is provided in the table herein below.<br />

5<br />

Pursuant to the target this number should have been nil.<br />

15<br />

TABLE: 1<br />

Particulars Regarding Examination of Constitutionality of Law<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Description 2061/062 2062/063 2063/064 2064/065 Average of 4 Years.<br />

1 Pending balance 28 54 74 65 55<br />

2 New registration 54 82 48 40 56<br />

3 Total 82 136 122 105 111<br />

4 Disposal 28 62 57 36 46<br />

5 Current balance 54 74 65 69 -<br />

6 From among the pending balance<br />

petition exceeding one year<br />

- 20 22 34 5<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of disposal for all the years should have been equal to the new registration of that<br />

year, but in the third year the ratio of disposal has been more than the new registration. Pursuant<br />

to the target of the Plan, the number of petitions exceeding one year should have been zero. In<br />

comparison to other kinds of writ and cases submitted before the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, although special<br />

importance and priority had been given to such disputes and where the target was to dispose the<br />

case within one year, the disposal of cases having similar nature have been slow and irregular.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!