The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
The Nepali Judiciary - Supreme Court Of Nepal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter Three<br />
Review of First Plan<br />
3.1 Background<br />
<strong>The</strong> first Plan of the judiciary had identified four core functions of the judiciary and<br />
separate target had been identified for each function. In order to evaluate the results with<br />
the determined standard and time frame, result indicators had also been prescribed.<br />
3.2 Core Functions<br />
<strong>The</strong> provision of advisory function on constitutional and legal issues had been<br />
discontinued by the Interim Constitution, 2063, wherein this core function was deemed<br />
irrelevant and as such the advisory function of the judiciary was removed upon mid-term<br />
review. <strong>The</strong> achievements of the task that were given continuity till the end of the Plan<br />
period are given herein below:<br />
3.2.1 Adjudication Function<br />
3.2.1.1 Examination of constitutionality of law<br />
Writ petition registered pursuant to Article 88 (1) of the Constitution of the Kingdom of<br />
<strong>Nepal</strong>, 1990, and Article 107 (1) of the Interim Constitution, were determined to be<br />
disposed within one year from the date of registration of such petitions. Disposal record of<br />
writ petition is provided in the table herein below.<br />
5<br />
Pursuant to the target this number should have been nil.<br />
15<br />
TABLE: 1<br />
Particulars Regarding Examination of Constitutionality of Law<br />
S.<br />
No.<br />
Description 2061/062 2062/063 2063/064 2064/065 Average of 4 Years.<br />
1 Pending balance 28 54 74 65 55<br />
2 New registration 54 82 48 40 56<br />
3 Total 82 136 122 105 111<br />
4 Disposal 28 62 57 36 46<br />
5 Current balance 54 74 65 69 -<br />
6 From among the pending balance<br />
petition exceeding one year<br />
- 20 22 34 5<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of disposal for all the years should have been equal to the new registration of that<br />
year, but in the third year the ratio of disposal has been more than the new registration. Pursuant<br />
to the target of the Plan, the number of petitions exceeding one year should have been zero. In<br />
comparison to other kinds of writ and cases submitted before the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, although special<br />
importance and priority had been given to such disputes and where the target was to dispose the<br />
case within one year, the disposal of cases having similar nature have been slow and irregular.