10.04.2013 Views

n Alas - Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys - State ...

n Alas - Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys - State ...

n Alas - Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I<br />

-1977, RelImlnary documentat!on lor a FORTRAN<br />

pragram to compute gravity terrain corrections<br />

based on topography digitized an a geogrephio<br />

grid: U.S. Geologtcal Survey Open-File Report<br />

77-535, 45 p.<br />

?hM, Edward, Bonini, W. E., Ostenso, N. A., and<br />

Woollard, G. P., 1958, Gravity measurements in<br />

<strong>Alas</strong>ka: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />

Reports, Reference 58-54, 104 p.<br />

Bg -he D. S&@WIS, C. hhr, and Robert<br />

A. Pase<br />

During the past year, analysh <strong>of</strong> seismio data<br />

from the network in southern <strong>Alas</strong>ka has focused on<br />

ahallow seismicity in three areas: the Yakataga<br />

selsmic gap along the northeastern Gulf <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alas</strong>ka, the<br />

southern Kenai Peninsula, and the active volcanoes<br />

west <strong>of</strong> Cook Inlet. A summary <strong>of</strong> the results for each<br />

<strong>of</strong> these areas Is presented below.<br />

Y.AKATAG.4 SEISMIC GAP<br />

Continued monitoring <strong>of</strong> the seismicity In and<br />

near the Yakataga seismic gap has revealed some<br />

interesting variations in the rates <strong>of</strong> ectivity during<br />

the past 2 years. Figure 3 shows the epicenters <strong>of</strong><br />

earthquakes that occurred between Ootober 1, 1978,<br />

and September 14, 1981. As noted in earlier reports<br />

(for example, Stephens and others, 198l), the spatial<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> the seismicity is remarkably stable. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the activity occurs at or near the perimeter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Yakataga gap, as defined by McCann and others (1980)<br />

and Lahr and others (19801, and is dominated by after<br />

shmks from the 1979 St. Elias earthquake. Figure 4<br />

plots the rate <strong>of</strong> activity as a function <strong>of</strong> time for<br />

various subregions <strong>of</strong> figure 3. The most striking<br />

featme in these curves is a tw<strong>of</strong>old to threefold in-<br />

crease in the montNy number <strong>of</strong> located events that<br />

began about October 1980 for the Waxell Ridge,<br />

Copper River delta, St. Elias, and Wrangell sub-<br />

regions. These elevated levels <strong>of</strong> activlty continued<br />

for about 6 to 8 months and then returned to new<br />

hose observed during the earlier period. The in-<br />

reased level <strong>of</strong> activlty within the aftershock zone <strong>of</strong><br />

he 1979 St. EUas earthquakes appears to be superim-<br />

posed on a long-term decay in the rate <strong>of</strong> aftershock<br />

activity that approximates the expected inverse time<br />

decay for aftershwks. The <strong>of</strong>hhore subregion under-<br />

went a gradual increase beginning about June lQ8O and<br />

returned to normal in November 1980. A review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

data-processing procedures and station-operation his-<br />

tory for the period since October 1979 suggests that<br />

although these factors may introduce some apparent<br />

changes In activity rate, they are not likely sources <strong>of</strong><br />

systematic errors wNch could account for the ob-<br />

served long-term variations in seismidty rates. The<br />

seismicity rates for the subregions <strong>of</strong> northern Prloce<br />

WUam Sound and Yakutat Bay were also reviewed,<br />

but actual changes in the rates <strong>of</strong> sebmialty cannot be<br />

reliably established owing to the systematic biases<br />

known to exist. For Prince Willtam Sound, a change in<br />

the timing criteria to reduce the number <strong>of</strong> small<br />

events to be located coincides with an apparent sharp<br />

decrease in activity beginning In October 1980. Jn the<br />

Yakutat Bay subregion, a reduction in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

operating stattons may have (ntroduced the apparent<br />

decrease in seismicity beglnnlng In August 1980.<br />

These observations suggest that a perturbation<br />

occurred in the reglonal stress field in and mound the<br />

Yakataga seismic gap. The possible significance <strong>of</strong><br />

thia change in seismicity as a precursor to a gap-fllllng<br />

earthquake la being weighed.<br />

The Waxell Ridge subregion Is the most sehrnie<br />

ally active area within the Yaketaga seismic gap, as<br />

defined in figure 3. Whether this shallow seismicity<br />

occum at the thrust interface between the Paclflc<br />

plate and the overrfding North American plate, which<br />

is thought to underlle this subregion at a depth <strong>of</strong> 10 to<br />

20 km, or on faults within the overlying plate is uncer-<br />

tain, prharlly because the focal depths <strong>of</strong> events<br />

located in thts mea are poorly constrained. Orellmi-<br />

nary results from a study <strong>of</strong> selected events in the<br />

Waxell Ridge subregion suggest that the earthquakes<br />

occur at depths shallower than 20 fnn. Although the<br />

coverage <strong>of</strong> the focal sphere for Fwave flrst motions<br />

is inadequate to distinguish between di-p or strke<br />

slip motion for the earthquake meohanisms, the orIen-<br />

tations <strong>of</strong> the axe3 <strong>of</strong> maximum compressive stress are<br />

constrained to be northwest-soutbeastw&d. This<br />

result is compatble with the direction <strong>of</strong> convergence<br />

between the North American and Pacific plates<br />

inferred from adjacent arm along this part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plate boundary (for example, Peree and Jacob, 1980).<br />

SOUTHERN KBNAI PENINSULA<br />

Using data from the Bradley Lake network<br />

(northeast <strong>of</strong> Homer) for December 1980 through July<br />

1981, a preliminary review was made <strong>of</strong> the firstmotion<br />

data for cmatal earthquakes that occurred<br />

beneath the southern Kenai Peninsula. This review<br />

was made in conjunction with Woodward-Clyde Consultants,<br />

who are under contract with the U.S. Army<br />

Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers to assefcs the seismic hazards In the<br />

region <strong>of</strong> a prop3ed hydroelectrio project. Compwlte<br />

focal mechdsrna were made for a few <strong>of</strong> the clusters<br />

<strong>of</strong> earthquakes that occurred near the mapped surface<br />

traces <strong>of</strong> maJor faults. nese focal mechanisms ware<br />

clearly consistent with normal faulting, notwithstnnding<br />

the ordnary systematic errors In properly locating<br />

the h t arrivals on the focal sphere due to uncertdnties<br />

in the velocity structure. The orientation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

principal tension axls was constrained to be within<br />

about 20' <strong>of</strong> east-west. This result, in a region <strong>of</strong><br />

northwestdlreoted subduction, was nclt expected. One<br />

possible explanation Is that the crust is 1- in<br />

tension now, since the 1964 earthquake, but that the<br />

stress pattern wU1 change to northwestsoutheastwardoriented<br />

comprersion In the future as stresses build up<br />

before another large Wst earthquake.<br />

WESTERN COOK INLET VOLCANOES<br />

With partid support from the U.S. <strong>Geological</strong><br />

Surveyls Volcano Hazards Program,' sehlaity in the<br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> three actlve volcanoes-spurr, Redoubt and<br />

IUamaa--weat af Cook Met waa examined in detall for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!