Study of respiratory symptoms among sputum positive
Study of respiratory symptoms among sputum positive Study of respiratory symptoms among sputum positive
Table (26) shows that, there was high significant difference between " smokers with typical CXR in smear +ve than in smear -ve for AFB, P= 0.001, among smear + for AFB typical CXR smoker 85.5% and in smoker 81.4% but there is a high difference between typical and atypical in smoker smear +ve patients 85.5% and 14.5% respectively, and also there was non significance in smear -ve for AFB p> 0.05 typical smoker CXR in smear ve 60% and non smoker 59.1% and there is no significance increase in smoker smear -ve as regard typical and atypical presentation 60%, 40% in smear +ve smoker for advanced = 47.7% and 30% in smear -ve for AFB. L 1"-- Minimal lesions in smear +ve 20%, 50% in smear -ve for AFB. . "< Table (27) showed positive significant correlation between smoking degree and CXR extent r = 0.43, P < 0.05. Tables (28, 29) show that, positive significant correlation between haemoptysis and CXR extent r = 0.49 P = 0.001 and also, there was significant association between haemoptysis and CXR (Cavitation and extent), cavitary haemoptysis in smear +ve represent 66.3% and in smear- ve for AFB 15.4%, P = 0.001. Table (30) shows that, CT findings in smear +ve and smear -ve for AFB were non significant P > 0.05 in smear -ve for AFB nodular single cavity, multiple small cavities and pleural effusion was 0% and represents 33%, 33%, 16.5% and 25% in smear +ve for AFB. Calcified nodule was 16.75% in smear +ve and 66% in smear -ve and consolidation was 41.7% in smear +ve and 33% in smear -Yeo Table (31) shows that, correlation between CT and X- ray finding it was non significant P > 0.05. Consolidation 40%, calcification and single cavity represented in both CXR + CT by 26.7% bronchial dilation not 85
- Page 48: loss and persistent productive coug
- Page 51 and 52: -- 1(rVliwoj"£iteratttre Miliary T
- Page 53 and 54: or I than 20-30. More than 20 cases
- Page 55: it fifuew oj"£iterature Diagnosis
- Page 59: An induration of 2 1Omm is classifi
- Page 63 and 64: provides additional material for st
- Page 67 and 68: f 2) The 2 nd role for the smear is
- Page 69: 1 I rJ(fview o[£iterature On the o
- Page 73: j - Immunological techniques in the
- Page 82 and 83: "'Sever or massive = coughing up 15
- Page 84 and 85: -. -I (4) Tuberculin skin test: Tub
- Page 86: - Centrifuge. - Vortex Mixer. - Phe
- Page 93: J.. r RESULTS
- Page 97: 1 r-- .....- ..., I p= 0.0002, sh
- Page 102 and 103: 2 -?=,! --- M>.i!ll . - -.*-r-.*,y-
- Page 106 and 107: (12) Prevalence of non respiratory
- Page 108: .iIi-'· . (13) Distribution of com
- Page 111 and 112: (17) Specificity and sensitivity of
- Page 116: ....' ." T- I (23) Duration of resp
- Page 125 and 126: --- I .--- 120 100 • • • -
- Page 128: person with cough, chest pain for o
- Page 137: 1 r--- tJJircussion In this study (
- Page 140: £Jisctt.fsion Table (33) showed, m
- Page 144: ... J I Summary andConclitsion Summ
Table (26) shows that, there was high significant difference between<br />
" smokers with typical CXR in smear +ve than in smear -ve for AFB, P=<br />
0.001, <strong>among</strong> smear + for AFB typical CXR smoker 85.5% and in smoker<br />
81.4% but there is a high difference between typical and atypical in smoker<br />
smear +ve patients 85.5% and 14.5% respectively, and also there was non<br />
significance in smear -ve for AFB p> 0.05 typical smoker CXR in smear<br />
ve 60% and non smoker 59.1% and there is no significance increase in<br />
smoker smear -ve as regard typical and atypical presentation 60%, 40% in<br />
smear +ve smoker for advanced = 47.7% and 30% in smear -ve for AFB.<br />
L<br />
1"-- Minimal lesions in smear +ve 20%, 50% in smear -ve for AFB.<br />
. "<<br />
Table (27) showed <strong>positive</strong> significant correlation between smoking<br />
degree and CXR extent r = 0.43, P < 0.05.<br />
Tables (28, 29) show that, <strong>positive</strong> significant correlation between<br />
haemoptysis and CXR extent r = 0.49 P = 0.001 and also, there was<br />
significant association between haemoptysis and CXR (Cavitation and<br />
extent), cavitary haemoptysis in smear +ve represent 66.3% and in smear-<br />
ve for AFB 15.4%, P = 0.001.<br />
Table (30) shows that, CT findings in smear +ve and smear -ve for<br />
AFB were non significant P > 0.05 in smear -ve for AFB nodular single<br />
cavity, multiple small cavities and pleural effusion was 0% and represents<br />
33%, 33%, 16.5% and 25% in smear +ve for AFB. Calcified nodule was<br />
16.75% in smear +ve and 66% in smear -ve and consolidation was 41.7%<br />
in smear +ve and 33% in smear -Yeo<br />
Table (31) shows that, correlation between CT and X- ray finding it<br />
was non significant P > 0.05. Consolidation 40%, calcification and single<br />
cavity represented in both CXR + CT by 26.7% bronchial dilation not<br />
85
Change language