- Page 1 and 2:
Building envelope performance asses
- Page 3 and 4:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 5 and 6:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 7 and 8:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 9 and 10:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 11 and 12:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 13 and 14:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 15 and 16:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 17 and 18:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 19 and 20:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 21 and 22:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 23 and 24:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 25 and 26:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 27 and 28:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 29 and 30:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 31 and 32:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 33 and 34: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 35 and 36: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 37 and 38: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 39 and 40: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 41 and 42: BUILDING RESEARCH &INFORMATION (200
- Page 43 and 44: LisÖ et al. on how to cope with an
- Page 45 and 46: LisÖ et al. the exposure to contin
- Page 47 and 48: LisÖ et al. business premises. The
- Page 49 and 50: LisÖ et al. construction industry
- Page 51 and 52: Research in Building Physics, Carme
- Page 53 and 54: 4 CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS FOR NORW
- Page 55 and 56: with large amounts of precipitation
- Page 57 and 58: will most likely be worse, even wit
- Page 59: Graves, H.M. & Phillipson, M.C. 200
- Page 62 and 63: 766 Nordvik and Lisø The topic of
- Page 64 and 65: 768 Nordvik and Lisø into the futu
- Page 66 and 67: 770 Nordvik and Lisø climate chang
- Page 68 and 69: 772 Nordvik and Lisø 0 Â Â = p d
- Page 70 and 71: 774 Nordvik and Lisø probably to a
- Page 73 and 74: BUILDING RESEARCH &INFORMATION (200
- Page 75 and 76: cost of repairing process-induced b
- Page 77 and 78: change in quality (Mehus et al., 20
- Page 79 and 80: on the impacts of different climati
- Page 81 and 82: different strategies: risk-based, p
- Page 83: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 87 and 88: An important aspect of the programm
- Page 89 and 90: Concrete walls 32 % LECA masonry 10
- Page 91 and 92: construction industry, and academic
- Page 93 and 94: BUILDING RESEARCH &INFORMATION (JAN
- Page 95 and 96: greater variations (Lisø et al., 2
- Page 97 and 98: Typical problem areas and recommend
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 3b Recommended design of win
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 7 Example showing the recomm
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 11a Poor solution for a £as
- Page 105 and 106: Acknowledgements This paper was wri
- Page 107 and 108: Climate adapted design of masonry s
- Page 109 and 110: 2. Masonry defects in Norway 2.1. S
- Page 111 and 112: Fig. 2. Example illustrations of th
- Page 113 and 114: The presented results are in good a
- Page 115 and 116: appropriate in a more severe type o
- Page 117 and 118: screen in a two-stage weatherproofi
- Page 119 and 120: INCREASED SNOW LOADS AND WIND ACTIO
- Page 121 and 122: The hurricane (Beaufort number 12)
- Page 123 and 124: The extensive revisions of the code
- Page 125 and 126: The number of buildings investigate
- Page 127 and 128: As is apparent from the values in t
- Page 129 and 130: climate change is now dominated by
- Page 131: TABLE 3. Summary of findings Struct
- Page 134 and 135:
Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 136 and 137:
temperature of -4°C or less. See F
- Page 138 and 139:
Today, frost resistance of brick, c
- Page 140 and 141:
degree of saturation, freezing will
- Page 142 and 143:
accelerated frost damage or frost d
- Page 144 and 145:
A possible objection to the present
- Page 146 and 147:
[17] Dührkop H., Saretok V., Sneck
- Page 149 and 150:
Decay potential in wood structures
- Page 151 and 152:
Wood decaying fungi will only be ac
- Page 153 and 154:
to promote decay prevails. Two of t
- Page 155:
Acknowledgements This paper has bee
- Page 158 and 159:
(a driving rain gauge), however, is
- Page 160 and 161:
Fig. 1. Map of Norwayshowing the lo
- Page 162 and 163:
Frequency 25 20 15 10 5 0 highest p
- Page 164 and 165:
interesting to compare those result
- Page 167 and 168:
Effects of wind exposure on roof sn
- Page 169 and 170:
In ISO 4355 ”Bases for design of
- Page 171 and 172:
variety of roofs and wind exposures
- Page 173 and 174:
Li and Pomeroy [13] evaluated hourl
- Page 175 and 176:
Fig. 5. Exposure coefficients for 3
- Page 177 and 178:
meteorological stations are expecte
- Page 179 and 180:
Many of the meteorological stations
- Page 181 and 182:
the ground with return period of 30
- Page 183:
References [1] Standards Norway. De