Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU
Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU
Construction Management and Economics (September 2004) 22, 765–775 A primer on the building economics of climate change VIGGO NORDVIK 1 * and KIM ROBERT LISØ 1,2 1Norwegian Building Research Institute (NBI), PO Box 123 Blindern, N-0314, Oslo, Norway 2Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Received 21 August 2003; accepted 12 March 2004 Climate change will entail new conditions for the construction industry. Knowledge about the implications of climate change on the built environment will be of the utmost importance to the industry in years to come. A building is a ‘long lasting’ durable asset that is changed over time due to exogenously imposed strains and by actions. The built environment has an expected lifetime varying from 60 to more than 100 years. Hence, the building economics of climate change should be treated within a dynamic analytical framework that explicitly allows for changes in the information sets over time. The building stock of the future consists of the building stock of today and of new construction. In the future, parts of the present building stock will be adapted to changes in the environment, while some parts will be kept as they are. Analysis of how building stock is affected by future climate change should handle this diversity. This can be done through the use of a putty-clay model. Uncertainty of what kind of climate regimes will prevail in the future enhances the profitability of actions that increase future flexibility. Hence, the real option approach to building economics is utilized. Keywords: Building economics, global warming, climate change, putty-clay, real options, building stock, building enclosure performance Introduction Empirical observations and modelling increasingly point to global warming and long-term changes in the climate system. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concludes that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities, and that anthropogenic climate change is likely to persist for many centuries. The ability to respond to climatic change in terms of averting negative consequences and capitalizing on any potential benefits arising from it is central to managing vulnerability (Lisø et al., 2003a). Climatic impact from precipitation, wind, temperature and exposure to the sun causes extensive degradation and damage to the built environment every year. This can be related to variations over normal everyday impact from different climate parameters, and it can be related to more extreme and less frequent climatic *Author for correspondence. E-mail: viggo.nordvik@byggforsk.no events. Climatic impacts affect operating costs and maintenance. The design of building enclosures should be expected to be the result of choices based on optimally utilized information and knowledge on both building technology and the different impacts the buildings are exposed to. An increase in the knowledge about, and focus on, the impacts of different climatic parameters on building enclosure performance will lead to a more climate-adapted design in new construction. Utilization of this kind of knowledge also gives a potential for a more robust performance of existing buildings. A more focused attention on climatic impact will also contribute to a higher level of reliability in buildings, extended lifetime, reduced administration, damage and maintenance costs through correct planning and design. The design of one single building is primarily affected by the stock of knowledge at the point in time where the building was erected. However, buildings are adapted, maintained and rehabilitated over time. Hence, the present state of a building will also be affected by knowledge, both on building technology and expected strains, which has arrived during the time after completion. Construction Management and Economics ISSN 0144-6193 print/ISSN 1466-433X online © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000213256
- Page 9 and 10: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 11 and 12: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 13 and 14: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 15 and 16: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 17 and 18: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 19 and 20: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 21 and 22: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 23 and 24: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 25 and 26: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 27 and 28: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 29 and 30: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 31 and 32: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 33 and 34: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 35 and 36: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 37 and 38: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 39 and 40: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 41 and 42: BUILDING RESEARCH &INFORMATION (200
- Page 43 and 44: LisÖ et al. on how to cope with an
- Page 45 and 46: LisÖ et al. the exposure to contin
- Page 47 and 48: LisÖ et al. business premises. The
- Page 49 and 50: LisÖ et al. construction industry
- Page 51 and 52: Research in Building Physics, Carme
- Page 53 and 54: 4 CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS FOR NORW
- Page 55 and 56: with large amounts of precipitation
- Page 57 and 58: will most likely be worse, even wit
- Page 59: Graves, H.M. & Phillipson, M.C. 200
- Page 63 and 64: Building economics of climate chang
- Page 65 and 66: Building economics of climate chang
- Page 67 and 68: Building economics of climate chang
- Page 69 and 70: Building economics of climate chang
- Page 71: Building economics of climate chang
- Page 74 and 75: LisÖ Introduction At present, buil
- Page 76 and 77: LisÖ In this context, a system can
- Page 78 and 79: LisÖ Many different levels of poli
- Page 80 and 81: LisÖ Independent institutions with
- Page 82 and 83: LisÖ Mills, E. (2003) Climate chan
- Page 84 and 85: Lisø, K.R./ Building envelope perf
- Page 86 and 87: 1.2 The extent of building defects
- Page 88 and 89: uilt together and holiday homes. Ap
- Page 90 and 91: flashing techniques were involved i
- Page 92 and 93: Byggskadefonden (The Danish Buildin
- Page 94 and 95: LisÖ et al. Introduction Backgroun
- Page 96 and 97: LisÖ et al. Table 1 Ranking of £a
- Page 98 and 99: LisÖ et al. Figure 2a Unsatisfacto
- Page 100 and 101: LisÖ et al. Figure 4 Recommended d
- Page 102 and 103: LisÖ et al. Figure 9b Flashing det
- Page 104 and 105: LisÖ et al. related to broken roof
- Page 106 and 107: LisÖ et al. Gable £ashing A flang
- Page 108 and 109: important drivers for change. In re
Construction Management and Economics (September 2004) 22, 765–775<br />
A primer on the building economics of climate change<br />
VIGGO NORDVIK 1 * and KIM ROBERT LISØ 1,2<br />
1Norwegian Building Research Institute (NBI), PO Box 123 Blindern, N-0314, Oslo, Norway<br />
2Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (<strong>NTNU</strong>),<br />
NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway<br />
Received 21 August 2003; accepted 12 March 2004<br />
Climate change will entail new conditions for the construction industry. Knowledge about the implications of<br />
climate change on the built environment will be of the utmost importance to the industry in years to come. A<br />
building is a ‘long lasting’ durable asset that is changed over time due to exogenously imposed strains and by<br />
actions. The built environment has an expected lifetime varying from 60 to more than 100 years. Hence, the<br />
building economics of climate change should be treated within a dynamic analytical framework that explicitly<br />
allows for changes in the information sets over time. The building stock of the future consists of the building<br />
stock of today and of new construction. In the future, parts of the present building stock will be adapted to<br />
changes in the environment, while some parts will be kept as they are. Analysis of how building stock is affected<br />
by future climate change should handle this diversity. This can be done through the use of a putty-clay model.<br />
Uncertainty of what kind of climate regimes will prevail in the future enhances the profitability of actions that<br />
increase future flexibility. Hence, the real option approach to building economics is utilized.<br />
Keywords: Building economics, global warming, climate change, putty-clay, real options, building stock,<br />
building enclosure performance<br />
Introduction<br />
Empirical observations and modelling increasingly<br />
point to global warming and long-term changes in<br />
the climate system. The Intergovernmental Panel on<br />
Climate Change concludes that most of the warming<br />
observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human<br />
activities, and that anthropogenic climate change is<br />
likely to persist for many centuries. The ability to<br />
respond to climatic change in terms of averting negative<br />
consequences and capitalizing on any potential benefits<br />
arising from it is central to managing vulnerability (<strong>Lisø</strong><br />
et al., 2003a).<br />
Climatic impact from precipitation, wind, temperature<br />
and exposure to the sun causes extensive degradation<br />
and damage to the built environment every year.<br />
This can be related to variations over normal everyday<br />
impact from different climate parameters, and it can be<br />
related to more extreme and less frequent climatic<br />
*Author for correspondence. E-mail: viggo.nordvik@byggforsk.no<br />
events. Climatic impacts affect operating costs and<br />
maintenance. The design of building enclosures should<br />
be expected to be the result of choices based on optimally<br />
utilized information and knowledge on both<br />
building technology and the different impacts the buildings<br />
are exposed to. An increase in the knowledge<br />
about, and focus on, the impacts of different climatic<br />
parameters on building enclosure performance will lead<br />
to a more climate-adapted design in new construction.<br />
Utilization of this kind of knowledge also gives a potential<br />
for a more robust performance of existing buildings.<br />
A more focused attention on climatic impact will also<br />
contribute to a higher level of reliability in buildings,<br />
extended lifetime, reduced administration, damage and<br />
maintenance costs through correct planning and design.<br />
The design of one single building is primarily affected<br />
by the stock of knowledge at the point in time where the<br />
building was erected. However, buildings are adapted,<br />
maintained and rehabilitated over time. Hence, the<br />
present state of a building will also be affected by knowledge,<br />
both on building technology and expected strains,<br />
which has arrived during the time after completion.<br />
Construction Management and Economics<br />
ISSN 0144-6193 print/ISSN 1466-433X online © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd<br />
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals<br />
DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000213256