10.04.2013 Views

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Year of construction, loads and geographical location<br />

Design loads on buildings have changed considerably in the period from 1949 till today. The year of<br />

construction may therefore tell something about the building’s safety level. In general, older<br />

buildings in high-snowfall areas may have a lower safety with respect to snow loads than newer<br />

buildings. The difference in safety level with respect to wind action is probably somewhat less.<br />

The safety level is probably affected mostly in areas that are heavily exposed to the environmental<br />

loads, when snow loads and wind actions in the regulations are increased from general loads that<br />

have applied to the entire country to differentiated loads that are adjusted to the actual environmental<br />

load variation in Norway. Increased wind actions therefore probably have the greatest consequences<br />

for coastal areas from northwest Norway northward. Locally, roughness of terrain and topography<br />

may be of great significance for the wind actions that the buildings experience. Inland areas high<br />

above sea level are most vulnerable to increased snow loads. Locally, topography and wind action is<br />

also important for the snow loads that the building experiences.<br />

The construction process<br />

Questions may be raised as to whether buildings erected by way of voluntary communal work or that<br />

are self-built, are more vulnerable to collapse than other buildings. It has been claimed that savings<br />

on design costs and technical expertise in the construction phase are often made for such buildings.<br />

Such savings can lead to little or no documentation of the structures being produced, and there may<br />

be a lack of people with the necessary technical competence to take overall responsibility for the<br />

execution of the work. This can lead to unfortunate improvisations on site that is assessed by the<br />

person implementing the project as “good enough”. It is therefore reasonable to believe that there is a<br />

greater probability of weak points that can result in the sudden collapse of such buildings.<br />

Prefabricated structures are often imported. It has been claimed that the design calculations do not<br />

always meet the design rules set out in Norwegian codes and that many structures have been designed<br />

for relatively small snow loads compared to Norwegian requirements. Structures have been imported<br />

from countries such as Denmark that are designed for snow loads well below those required in<br />

Norway.<br />

The history of buildings<br />

Reconstruction or rebuilding may lead to significant changes in both design loads and load-bearing<br />

capacity. Columns and beams in outer walls (for example) may be centrally arranged during<br />

rebuilding, and thus assume greater loads. The need to strengthen structural elements, including<br />

foundations, may be extensive and is not always met. When walls are removed or new openings<br />

established, the stabilising elements of columns can change, or the anchoring may change, resulting<br />

in reduced load-bearing capacity.<br />

Modifying the construction of roof structures may result in load change. For example, roofs that<br />

are changed from e.g. roofing membranes to tiles acquire an additional load of about 0.5 kN/m 2 .<br />

Additional insulation of roofs in older buildings may lead to reduced snow melting. Assuming the<br />

same precipitation pattern, this may result in larger quantities of snow remaining on the roof than<br />

before the additional insulation.<br />

Changing the use of buildings, which may lead to greater consequences in the event of collapse,<br />

makes it necessary to reassess the capacity of the structures. In the case of a change of use from for<br />

example a storage building to a building for public use, the requirement concerning maximum annual<br />

probability of failure becomes more stringent, and there may be a need to strengthen the building.<br />

Selection criteria<br />

It would be desirable to identify a selection of buildings that could at large be characterised as<br />

communal halls, sports halls, buildings used by many people, lightweight structures, prefabricated<br />

buildings, buildings with large spans, buildings supplied as package solutions, buildings with<br />

modified applications, buildings erected via communal voluntary work, temporary structures and<br />

converted buildings. These are building types all of which are regarded as being especially exposed<br />

to increasing snow loads and wind actions.<br />

<strong>Manuscript</strong> No. ST/2005/024694 6 of 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!