10.04.2013 Views

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

Lisø PhD Dissertation Manuscript - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Masonry defects in Norway<br />

2.1. Source and method<br />

SINTEF Building and Infrastructure’s archive of process induced building defect<br />

assignments represents one of Norway’s most important sources of knowledge on types of<br />

building defects and related causes [3] [4]. SINTEF Building and Infrastructure has<br />

undertaken analyses of building defects for more than five decades, both on behalf of the<br />

construction industry and in comprehensive field investigations. General information on<br />

these assignments is filed in the institute’s central archive, and registered electronically.<br />

Ingvaldsen [5] defines “process induced building defects” as absence or reduction<br />

of presupposed capacity that is discovered after a construction project has been completed<br />

and taken over by the owner, and which he demands to be repaired. Thus, process induced<br />

building defects bring about exceptional maintenance costs, i.e. cost that should not have<br />

been incurred – or additional costs related to more frequent maintenance than forecast.<br />

This is because the actors involved have not succeeded in fulfilling the requirements of<br />

standardised or generally recognised methods or specifications. Defects caused by normal<br />

wear and tear are not defined as building defects. The same goes for damage due to fire or<br />

natural damage, damage which is not included in this definition.<br />

The expensive lessons learned described in the previous section should be<br />

employed to good purpose in new building. Altogether it is found that SINTEF Building<br />

and Infrastructure has more than 5,000 process induced building defect assignment reports<br />

in its archives [3] [5]. The ongoing establishment of the archive allows for in-depth<br />

analyses of causal relations of different types of building defects on a wide variety of<br />

building envelope elements. Results from a comprehensive investigation of the paper<br />

copies of 302 process induced building defect assignment reports inflicted on masonry<br />

structures for the 20-year period 1983-2002 are presented in this paper, adopting the<br />

definition above (in the following referred to as “process induced masonry defects”).<br />

2.2. Results<br />

Defects related to the building envelope constitute about two thirds of the about 2000<br />

investigated cases in the 10-year period 1993-2002 [3]. Defects related to external walls<br />

above ground level constitute 29% of the cases (see Fig. 1), about half of these related to<br />

masonry structures. Moisture as the main source causing the defect accounts for as much<br />

as 76% of all investigated cases. Many types of building defect cases are recurring items,<br />

which indicate a general lack of knowledge amongst the different actors in the construction<br />

industry concerning fundamental principles of building physics [3].<br />

LECA masonry<br />

32 %<br />

Concrete walls<br />

10 %<br />

Brick cavity or veneer walls<br />

17 %<br />

Other<br />

3 %<br />

Timber framework<br />

30 %<br />

Metal framework<br />

7 %<br />

Sandwichelements<br />

1 %<br />

Fig. 1. Process induced building defect cases for the 10-year period 1993-2002 (a total of about 2000<br />

building defect cases), distributed by type of external walls above terrain [3].<br />

Page 3 of 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!